Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
RESEARCH PAPER
A Comparative Analysis of Division in Elementary Mathematics Textbooks in Korea and Japan
1
Sintanjin Elementary School, SOUTH KOREA
2
Korea National University of Education, SOUTH KOREA
Online publication date: 2017-12-02
Publication date: 2017-12-02
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(3):811-822
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the study is to examine how Korean and Japanese elementary mathematics textbooks series present division in terms of the perspective of making connections. For this purpose, units dealing with division of whole numbers, fractions, and decimal numbers were analyzed with foci on the meanings of division and procedures of division. Findings showed that, in the textbooks of both countries, the various meanings of division were consistently applied not only to whole numbers but also to fractions and decimal numbers. Moreover, the procedures of division were connected as numbers were expanded from whole numbers to fractions. Noticeable differences included: as for the organization of the contents of division, Korean textbooks presented division of fractions first, whereas Japanese textbooks dealt with division of decimal numbers first. Regarding the meanings of division, the Korean textbooks dealt mainly with partition and measurement division situations, while the Japanese counterparts were more inclusive with multiple situations, such as determination of a unit rate. This study is expected to provide information on how Korean and Japanese textbooks present division and to give implications for textbook developers and teachers to connect division meaningfully as students deal with whole numbers, fractions, and decimal numbers.
REFERENCES (36)
1.
Alajmi, A. H. (2009). Addressing computational estimation in the Kuwaiti curriculum: Teachers’ views. Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 263-283.
2.
Alajmi, A. H. (2012). How do elementary textbooks address fractions? A review of mathematics textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 239-261.
3.
Barnett-Clarke, C., Fisher, W., Marks, R., & Ross, S. (2010). Developing essential understanding of rational numbers for teaching mathematics in grades 3-5. In R. I. Charles (Volume Ed.) & R. M. Zbiek (Series Ed.), Essential understandings series. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
4.
Blanton, M., Levi, L., Crites, T., & Dougherty, B. (2011). Developing essential understanding of algebraic thinking for teaching mathematics in grades 3-5. In B. J. Dougherty (Volume Ed.) & R. M. Zbiek (Series Ed.), Essential understandings series. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
5.
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6.
Charalambous, D., Delaney, S., Hsu, H., & Mesa, M. (2010). A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journal, 12(2), 117-151.
7.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. http://corestandards.org/asset....
8.
Gojak, L. M. (2013). Making mathematical connections. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/News-and-C....
9.
Hitotsumatsu, S., Masaki, K., Akai, T., Okada, Y., Machida, S., Moriya, Y., et al. (2011a). Study with your friends mathematics for elementary school 3-1. Takeshi, Nara: GAKKOHTOSHO.
10.
Hitotsumatsu, S., Masaki, K., Akai, T., Okada, Y., Machida, S., Moriya, Y., et al. (2011b). Study with your friends mathematics for elementary school 4-1. Takeshi, Nara: GAKKOHTOSHO.
11.
Hitotsumatsu, S., Masaki, K., Akai, T., Okada, Y., Machida, S., Moriya, Y., et al. (2011c). Study with your friends mathematics for elementary school 4-2. Takeshi, Nara: GAKKOHTOSHO.
12.
Hitotsumatsu, S., Masaki, K., Akai, T., Okada, Y., Machida, S., Moriya, Y., et al. (2011d). Study with your friends mathematics for elementary school 5-1. Takeshi, Nara: GAKKOHTOSHO.
13.
Hitotsumatsu, S., Masaki, K., Akai, T., Okada, Y., Machida, S., Moriya, Y., et al. (2011e). Study with your friends mathematics for elementary school 5-2. Takeshi, Nara: GAKKOHTOSHO.
14.
Hitotsumatsu, S., Masaki, K., Akai, T., Okada, Y., Machida, S., Moriya, Y., et al. (2011f). Study with your friends mathematics for elementary school 6-1. Takeshi, Nara: GAKKOHTOSHO.
15.
Ku, J., Kim, S., Lee, H. W., Cho, S., & Park, H. (2016). OECD programme for international students assessment: an analysis of PISA 2015 results [in Korean with English abstract]. KICE: Seoul.
16.
Li, Y. (2008). What do students need to learn about division of fractions? Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13(9), 546-552.
17.
Li, Y., & Kulm, G. (2008). Knowledge and confidence of pre-service mathematics teachers: The case of fraction division. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 833-843.
18.
Ministry of Education (MOE) (2015a). 5-2 Mathematics textbook (in Korean). Seoul, Korea: Chunjae Textbooks.
19.
Ministry of Education (MOE) (2015b). 6-1 Mathematics textbook (in Korean). Seoul, Korea: Chunjae Textbooks.
20.
Ministry of Education (MOE) (2016a). 3-1 Mathematics textbook (in Korean). Seoul, Korea: Chunjae Textbooks.
21.
Ministry of Education (MOE) (2016b). 3-2 Mathematics textbook (in Korean). Seoul, Korea: Chunjae Textbooks.
22.
Ministry of Education (MOE) (2016c). 4-1 Mathematics textbook (in Korean). Seoul, Korea: Chunjae Textbooks.
23.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
24.
Otto, A., Caldwell, J., Hancock, S. W., & Zbiek, R. M. (2011). Developing essential understanding of multiplication and division for teaching mathematics in grades 3-5. In E. C. Rathmell (Volume Ed.) & R. M. Zbiek (Series Ed.), Essential understandings series. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
25.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75, 211-246.
26.
Resnick, L. B., Nesher, P., Leonard, F., Magone, M., Omanson, S., & Peled, I. (1989). Conceptual bases of arithmetic errors: The case of decimal fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 8-27.
27.
Reys, R. E., Lindquist, M. M., Lambdin, D. V., & Smith, N. L. (2014). Helping children learn mathematics (9th edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
28.
Sanford, V. (1921). La Disme of Simon Stevin: The first book on decimals. The Mathematics Teacher, 14(6), 321-333.
29.
Sang, K., Kwak, Y., Park, J. H., & Park, S. (2016). The trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS): findings from TIMSS 2015 for Korea [in Korean with English abstract]. KICE: Seoul.
30.
Sherman, H. J., Richardson, L. I., & Yard, G. J. (2015). Teaching learners who struggle with mathematics: Responding with systematic intervention and remediation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
31.
Siebert, D. (2002). Connecting informal thinking and algorithms: the case of division of fractions. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions (pp.247-256). Reston, VA: NCTM.
32.
Sinicrope, R., Mick, H. W., & Kolb, J. R. (2002). Interpretations of fraction division. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions (pp.153-161). Reston, VA: NCTM.
33.
Son, J. W., & Senk, S. L. (2010). How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 117-142.
34.
Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–369). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
35.
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2008). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (Seventh edition). Boston: Pearson Education.
36.
Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Sanilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Looking inside the classroom: A study of K-12 mathematics and science education in United States. Chapel Hill: Horizon Research.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
