RESEARCH PAPER
An Analysis of Prospective Teachers’ Perceptions Concerning the Concept of “Social Media” through Metaphors
 
More details
Hide details
1
Hacettepe University, TURKEY
 
 
Online publication date: 2017-10-27
 
 
Publication date: 2017-10-27
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(1):45-52
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study was conducted so as to determine prospective teachers’ perceptions of the concept of “social media” through metaphors. The study group was composed of 138 prospective biology teachers attending Hacettepe and Gazi universities in 2015–2016 academic year. The participants were given the semi-structured interview form containing the statement “Social media is like ….. because….” And they were asked to complete the statement. The technique of content analysis was used in assessing the data collected. MAXQDA 12, a program for qualitative data analysis, was used in analysing the data. Having analysed the data, they were interpreted. Accordingly, 30.43% of the prospective teachers perceived the concept of social media as a harmful element, the great majority of them (66.67%) perceived the concept positively as an educational, technological, entertaining, indispensable part of life and as an instrument of communication.
REFERENCES (48)
1.
Acikgoz, K. (2002). Aktif Ogrenme. Izmir: Egitim Dunyasi Yayinlari.
 
2.
Arabacioglu, T., & Gokdas, I. (2015). Ogretmen adaylarinin Internet ve Facebook kavramlarina iliskin mecazlari. Egitim Teknolojileri Arastirmalari Dergisi, 6, 2.
 
3.
Ates, M., & Karatepe, A. (2013). Universite ogrencilerinin “Cevre” kavramina iliskin algilarinin metaforlar yardimiyla analizi. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(2).
 
4.
Aydin, F. V, & Unaldi, U. E. (2010). Cografya ogretmen adaylarinin “cografya” kavramina iliskin algilarinin metaforlar yardimiyla analizi. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 600-622.
 
5.
Baruah, T. D. (2012). Effectiveness of social media as a tool of communication and its potential for technology enabled connections: a micro-level study. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2(5), 1-10.
 
6.
Celik, I., Yurt, E., & Sahin, I. (2015). A model for understanding educational Facebook use. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(4), 899-907.
 
7.
Celik, M. (2017). Universite ogrencilerinin sosyal medya bagimlilik duzeylerinin incelenmesi: kultur universitesi ogrencileri uzerinde bir arastirma. 1st International Conference on New Trends in Communication.
 
8.
Chen, B., & Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 87-104.
 
9.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. USA: Sage Publications.
 
10.
Davis III, C. H., Deil-Amen, R., Rios-Aguilar, C., & Gonzalez Canche, M. S. (2012). Social media in higher education: A literature review and research directions. Report printed by the University of Arizona and Claremont Graduate University, 8.
 
11.
Eren, F., Celik, I., & Akturk, A. O. (2014). Ortaokul ogrencilerinin facebook algisi: bir metafor analizi. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 22(2), 635-648.
 
12.
Gallagher, S., & Schmicking, D. (2010). Handbook Of Phenomenology And Cognitive Science. Berlin: Springer.
 
13.
Garcia-Martin, J., Nicasio, J., & Sanchez, G. (2013). Patterns of web 2.0 tool use among young spanish people. Computers and Education, 67, 105-120.
 
14.
Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones and social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18-26.
 
15.
Gulbahar, Y., Kalelioglu, F., & Madran, O. (2010). Sosyal aglarin egitim amacli kullanimi. XV. Türkiye’de Internet Konferansi, 2-4.
 
16.
Ibret, U., & Aydinozu, D. (2011). Ilkogretim ii. Kademe ogrencilerinin “dunya” kavramina iliskin gelistirdikleri metaforlar. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 19(1), 85-102.
 
17.
Karaman, M. K. (2010). Ogretmen adaylarinin TV ve internet teknolojilerini kullanma amac ve beklentilerinin medya okuryazarligi baglaminda degerlendirilmesi. Usak Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 51-62.
 
18.
Khoshemehr, A. H. (2013). Bilgi ve belge yonetiminde uzaktan egitim: iran ve turkiye milli kutuphanelerinin rolu uzerine bir arastirma ve kavramsal model onerisi (PhD diss.), Ankara Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Ankara.
 
19.
Kirik, A. M., Arslan, A., Cetinkaya, A., & Gul, M. (2015). A quantitative research on the level of social media addiction among young people in Turkey. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 3(3), 108-122.
 
20.
Koseoglu, P (2017). An analysis of university students’ perceptions of the concepts of “water” and “water pollution” through metaphors. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(8), 4343-4350.
 
21.
Koseoglu, P., & Mercan, G. (2016). The educational use of Facebook as a social networking site in animal physiology classes. World Journal on Educational Technology, 8(3), 258-266.
 
22.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. California: Sage.
 
23.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2005). Metaforlar Hayat, Anlam Ve Dil, (Cev: Demir, G.Y.). Istanbul: Paradigma Yayincilik.
 
24.
Lau, W. W. (2017). Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 286-291.
 
25.
Lewis, B. K. (2009). Social media and strategic communication: attitudes and perceptions among college students (PhD diss.), Oklahoma State University.
 
26.
Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: how nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337-353.
 
27.
Lynch, H. L., & Fisher-Ari, T. R. (2017). Metaphor as pedagogy in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 195-203.
 
28.
Moran, M., Seaman, J., & Tinti-Kane, H. (2011). Teaching, Learning, and Sharing: How Today’s Higher Education Faculty Use Social Media. Babson Survey Research Group.
 
29.
Murray, C. (2008). Schools & social networking: fear or education? Synergy, 6(1), 8-12.
 
30.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2016). The Content Analysis Guidebook. Los Angeles: Sage.
 
31.
O’Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800-804.
 
32.
Perrin, A. (2015). Social Media Usage. Pew Research Center.
 
33.
Saban, A. (2008). Giris duzeyindeki sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin “ogretmen” kavramina iliskin ileri surdukleri metaforlar. Turk Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 131–155.
 
34.
Sahin, A., Kaynakci, C., & Aytop, Y. (2016). Ziraat fakultesi ogrencilerinin sosyal medya kullanim aliskanliklarinin belirlenmesi. JOTAF/Tekirdag Ziraat Fakultesi Dergisi, 13(2).
 
35.
Selwyn, N. (2012). Social media in higher education. The Europa World of Learning, 1-10.
 
36.
Senyuva, E., & Kaya, H. (2013). Metaphors for the internet used by nursing students in Turkey: a qualitative research. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 50, 87-106.
 
37.
Solis, B. (2010). Engage: The Complete Guide for Brands and Businesses to Build, Cultivate, and Measure Success in the New Web. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
 
38.
Sumuer, E., Esfer, S., & Yildirim, S. (2014). Teachers’ Facebook use: their use habits, intensity, self-disclosure, privacy settings, and activities on facebook. Educational Studies, 40(5), 537-553.
 
39.
Suraweera, N. S., Razali, N., Chouhan, L. B., Tamang, N., Hubilla, A. M. K. U., Ratnayake, A. M., & Mahesar, S. N. (2010). Value of social networking in libraries and information organizations in Asia and Oceania. In Gothenburg, Sweden: World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference And Assembly.
 
40.
Taniguchi, I. M. (2003). Internet metaphors matter. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 94, 13-22.
 
41.
Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)–a literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 60-68.
 
42.
Togay, A., Akdur, T. E., Yetisken, I. C., & Bilici, A. (2013). Egitim sureclerinde sosyal aglarin kullanimi: Bir MYO deneyimi. Paper presented at the XIV. Akademik Bilisim Konferansi, Istanbul, 28-30.
 
43.
Vadeboncoeur, J. A., & Torres, M. N. (2003). Constructing and reconstructing teaching roles: a focus on generative metaphors and dichotomies. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 24(1), 87-103.
 
44.
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.
 
45.
Vural, Z., & Bat, M. (2010). Yeni bir iletisim ortami olarak sosyal medya: ege universitesi iletisim fakultesine yonelik bir arastirma. Journal of Yasar University, 5(20).
 
46.
Yagmurlu, A. (2011). Kamu yonetiminde halkla iliskiler ve sosyal medya. Selcuk University Faculty of Communication Academic Journal, 7(1).
 
47.
Yildirim, A. ve Simsek, H. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Arastirma Yontemleri. Ankara: Seckin Yayincilik.
 
48.
Yuksel-Arslan, P., Yildirim, S., & Robin, B. R. (2016). A phenomenological study: teachers’ experiences of using digital storytelling in early childhood education. Educational Studies, 42(5), 427-445.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top