Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
An Empirical Study on the Quality of Entrepreneurship Education based on Performance Excellence Management
1
Henan University of Economics and Law, CHINA
2
Henan Institute of Science and Technology, CHINA
3
China Institute for Reform and Development, CHINA
4
Zhejiang University, CHINA
Online publication date: 2017-08-22
Publication date: 2017-08-22
Corresponding author
Yonghui Cao
School of E-commerce and Logistics Management, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou, 450046, China; School of Economics & Management, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, 453003, China; China Institute for Reform and Development, Haikou; 570312, China.
School of E-commerce and Logistics Management, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou, 450046, China; School of Economics & Management, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, 453003, China; China Institute for Reform and Development, Haikou; 570312, China.
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(8):5663-5673
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The performance excellence model provides a framework for the implementation of total quality management in Colleges and universities, based on the practice of entrepreneurship education in China’s colleges and universities, this paper uses the excellent performance management model to conduct an empirical analysis of the quality of entrepreneurship education, and gets the following conclusions: First, the driving wheel of entrepreneurship education consists of three dimensions: the leadership support of entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurship education strategy and market orientation, the driven wheel of entrepreneurship education includes entrepreneurship education resource allocation, the process of entrepreneurship education, the measurement and improvement of entrepreneurship education. Second, in the driving wheel, the leadership support of entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurship education market orientation have a positive effect on soft quality and hard quality of entrepreneurship education; the entrepreneurship education strategy only has a positive effect on the soft quality of entrepreneurship education, but on the hard quality is not verified. Third, in the driven wheel, entrepreneurship education resource allocation and the process have a positive effect on soft quality and hard quality of entrepreneurship education; the measurement and improvement of entrepreneurship education has positive effect on the hard quality of entrepreneurship education, but to the soft quality has not been verified.
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., & Fiet, J. O. (2014). The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: A meta‐analytic review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 217-254. doi:10.1111/etap.12095.
2.
Beard, D. F., & Humphrey, R. L. (2014). Alignment of university information technology resources with the Malcolm Baldrige results criteria for performance excellence in education: A balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Education for Business, 89(7), 382-388. doi:10.1080/08832323.2014.916649.
3.
Boulter, L., Bendell, T., & Dahlgaard, J. (2013). Total quality beyond North America: A comparative analysis of the performance of European Excellence Award winners. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(2), 197-215. doi:10.1108/01443571311295635.
4.
Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 75-93. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12065.
5.
Fry, L. W., Latham, J. R., Clinebell, S. K., & Krahnke, K. (2017). Spiritual leadership as a model for performance excellence: a study of Baldrige award recipients. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 14(1), 22-47. doi:10.1080/14766086.2016.1202130.
6.
Huber, L. R., Sloof, R., & Van Praag, M. (2014). The effect of early entrepreneurship education: Evidence from a field experiment. European Economic Review, 72, 76-97. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.09.002.
7.
Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 29(5), 577-598. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00099.x.
8.
Martin, B. C., McNally, J. J., & Kay, M. J. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 211-224. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.002.
9.
Pantouvakis, A., & Karakasnaki, M. (2017). Role of the human talent in total quality management–performance relationship: an investigation in the transport sector. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1-15. doi:10.1080/14783363.2017.1303873.
10.
Peterman, N. E., & Kennedy, J. (2003). Enterprise education: Influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 28(2), 129-144. doi:10.1046/j.1540-6520.2003.00035.x.
11.
Piperopoulos, P., & Dimov, D. (2015). Burst bubbles or build steam? Entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial self‐efficacy, and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 970-985. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12116.
12.
Rideout, E. C., & Gray, D. O. (2013). Does entrepreneurship education really work? A review and methodological critique of the empirical literature on the effects of university‐based entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 329-351. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12021.
13.
Suarez, E., Calvo-Mora, A., & Roldán, J. L. (2016). The role of strategic planning in excellence management systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 532-542. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.008.
14.
Tomaževič, N., Tekavčič, M., & Peljhan, D. (2017). Towards excellence in public administration: Organisation theory-based performance management model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(5-6), 578-599. doi:10.1080/14783363.2015.1102048.
15.
Wong, W. P., Tseng, M. L., & Tan, K. H. (2014). A business process management capabilities perspective on organisation performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(5-6), 602-617. doi:10.1080/14783363.2013.850812.
16.
Zhang, Y., Duysters, G., & Cloodt, M. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students’ entrepreneurial intention. International entrepreneurship and management journal, 10(3), 623-641. doi:10.1007/s11365-012-0246-z1.
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
