Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
An Investigation of Teachers’ Self Efficacy Beliefs Concerning Educational Technology Standards and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
1
Hacettepe Üniv. Eğitim Fak. Kimya Eğitimi ABD. Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey
Online publication date: 2017-07-29
Publication date: 2017-07-29
Corresponding author
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(8):4739-4752
KEYWORDS
teachersself-efficacy in educational technology standardstechnological pedagogical content knowledge
ABSTRACT
This study aims to investigate the technological pedagogical content knowledge levels of teachers and their self-efficacy in educational technology standards. Also, the difference between the mean scores of the teachers in different branches from the Scale of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and its sub factors and Scale for Educational Technology Standards (ETS) and its sub factors were analyzed. The distribution and correlation of teachers’ TPACK scores and their self-efficacy in educational technology standards in terms of sub-factors and general averages were analyzed. The sample was composed of 54 teachers at various schools located in Ankara. The descriptive statistics showed that the teachers’ scores were above the average for all TPACK and ETS scales, including the scale sub-factors. Also a significant difference between the mean scores of the teachers in different branches from TPACK and ETS scales and their sub factors was not determined. Further, moderate positive and significant correlations were found between ETS and TPACK total scores.
REFERENCES (40)
1.
Abbitt, J. T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134-143.
2.
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: An instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292-302.
3.
Beşoluk, Ş., & Horzum, M. B. (2011). Prospective teachers’ views regarding pedagogical courses, field knowledge courses and willingness to serve as a teacher, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(1), 17-49.
4.
Bilgin, İ., Tatar, E., & Ay, Y. (2012). Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Teknolojiye Karşı Tutumlarının Teknolojik Pedagojik Alan Bilgisi (TPAB)’ne Katkısının İncelenmesi. (Investigating the preservice primary school teachers’ contribution of attitudes towards technology to TPACK) X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı.
5.
Bozkurt, A., & Cilavdaroglu, A.K. (2011). Mathematics and classroom teachers’ perceptions of technology use and integration into their instruction. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 19(3), 859-870.
6.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57, 1184-1193.
7.
Chukwuemeka, E. J., & İşçioğlu, E. (2016). An Examination of Lecturers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Perceptions at the Faculty of Education in EMU in Cyprus. Croatian Journal of Education, 18(4), 999-1034.
8.
Çoklar, A. N. (2008). Öğretmen adaylarının eğitim teknolojisi standartları ile ilgili özyeterliklerinin belirlenmesi. (Assessıng the self-effıcacy of teacher candıdates concernıng the educatıonal technology standards), Doktora Tezi (Doctoral Thesis), Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
9.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Gömleksiz, M. N., & Fidan, E. K. (2011). Self-Efficacy perception levels of prospective teachers enrolled at pedagogical formation course toward web pedagogical content knowledge. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish, 6(4), 593-620.
11.
Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St. Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). TPACK Development in Science Teaching: Measuring the TPACK Confidence of in-service Science Teachers, TechTrends, Special Issue on TPACK, 53(5), 70-79.
12.
Graham, R.C., Borup, J., & Smith, N.B. (2011). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates’ technology integration decision. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 530-546.
13.
Gündoğmuş, N. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgileri ile öğrenme stratejileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. (Analysis of relationship between technological pedagogical and content knowledge and learning strategies of teacher candidates), Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi (Unpublished Masters’ Thesis), Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
14.
Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211-229.
15.
Ilgaz, H., & Usluel, Y. (2011). Öğretim sürecinde bit entegrasyonu açısından öğretmen yeterlikleri ve mesleki gelişim. (Teacher competencies according to ICT integration into the teaching processes and professional development) Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 10(19), 87-109.
16.
International Society for Technology in Education (2014). ISTE Standards Teachers. Retrieved 21.03. 2017, from https://www.iste.org/standards....
17.
Jang, S. J., & Tsai, M. F. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59, 327-338.
18.
Karasar, N. (1999), Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. (Scientific Research Methods) Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
19.
Kaya, Z., Emre, İ., & Kaya, O.N. (2010). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) açısından öz güven seviyelerinin belirlenmesi (Investigating primary school pre-service teachers’ TPACK self confidence levels). IX. Sınıf Öğretmenliği Eğitimi Sempozyumu Özet Kitapçığı, Elazığ, s. 643-651.
20.
Koc, M. (2005). Questioning technology use in educational reform: From ideological, theoretical and practical perspectives. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(2), 72-81.
22.
Koehler, M. (2012). Using the TPACK Image. Retrieved on 29.03.2017 from http://www.matt-koehler.com/tp....
23.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
24.
Eunjoo, O., & French, R. “Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of an Introductory Instructional Technology Course”. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 3(1), 2005.
25.
Oral, B. (2008). The evaluation of the student teachers’ attitudes toward Internet and democracy, Computers & Education, 50, 437–445.
26.
Orhan, D., Kurt, A. A., Ozan, Ş., Vural, S. S., & Türkan, F. (2014). Ulusal Eğitim Teknolojisi Standartlarına Genel Bir Bakış, (A Holistic View to National Educational Technology Standards), Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 2, 65-79.
27.
Özçiftçi, M., & Çakır, R. (2015). Öğretmenlerin yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri ve eğitim teknolojisi standartları özyeterliklerinin incelenmesi, (Investigating teachers’ perceptions about lifelong learning and self-efficacy beliefs about educational technology standarts), Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 5(1), 1-19.
28.
Öztürk, E., & Horzum, M. B. (2011). Teknolojik pedagojik içerik bilgisi ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlaması. (Adaptation of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Scale to Turkish) Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(3), 255-278.
29.
Pierson, M. E. (2001) Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 413–430.
30.
Rao, A. (2013, March, 29). What’s the difference between “using technology” and “technology integration”? Retrieved on 01.04.2017 from http://teachbytes.com/whats-th....
31.
Rugayah, H., Hashim, H., & Wan, N. M. (2004). Attitudes toward learning about and working with computers of students at unit. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 3(2). 24-35.
32.
Sahin, I., Akturk, A., & Schmidt, D. (2009). Relationship of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge with their vocational self-efficacy beliefs. In C. D. Maddux (Ed.), Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education, 293–301.
33.
Sancar Tokmak, H. Yavuz Konokman, G., & Yanpar Yelken, T. (2013). An investigation of Mersin University early childhood pre-service teachers’ self-confidence about their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 14(1), 35-51.
34.
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
35.
Seferoğlu, S. S. (2009). Yeterlikler, standartlar ve bilişim teknolojilerindeki gelişmeler ışığında öğretmenlerin sürekli mesleki eğitimi. (Teachers’ education in the light of technolojical developments: Standards and Efficacies). Eğitimde Yansımalar IX: Türkiye’nin Öğretmen Yetiştirme Çıkmazı Ulusal Sempozyumu, 204-217.
36.
Şimşek, Ö. (2016). Öğretmen Adaylarinin Teknolojik Pedagojik Alan Bilgisi Öz-Yeterliklerinin Uluslararasi Eğitim Teknolojisi Standartlari (Iste-T 2008) Bağlaminda İncelenmesi, (Analyzing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Self - Efficacy of Prospective Teachers in the Context of International Education Technology Standards (ISTE-T 2008)). Doktora Tezi (Doctoral Thesis), Dicle Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
37.
Şimşek, Ö., Demir, S., Bağçeci, B., & Kınay, İ. (2013). Öğretim Elemanlarının Teknopedagojik Eğitim Yeterliliklerinin Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi, (Examining Technopedagogical Knowledge Competencies of Teacher Trainers in Terms of Some Variables). Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 14(1), 1–23.
38.
Song, J., Liang, G., Liu, G., & Walls, R. T. (2005). Are teachers in China ready to teach in 21st Century? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), pp. 197-209.
39.
Ulucan, H., & Karabulut, E. O. (2012). Beden eğitimi öğretmen adaylarının eğitim teknolojisi standartları ile ilgili özyeterliklerinin incelenmesi.(The self-sufficiency analysis of prospective physical education teachers with regard to the educational technology standards) Selçuk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilim Dergisi, 14, 2, 243-248.
40.
Wetzel, K., & Marshall, S. (2011). TPACK goes to sixth grade: Lessons from a middle school teacher in a high-technology-access classroom. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(2), 73-81.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
