12/2017 vol. 13
Stats
CC-BY 4.0
Get citation
SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER
An Unfair Option Game: The Effects of Asymmetric Government Subsidy to Innovators and Imitators
Congcong Wang 1
,
 
Yan Fang 1
,
 
Rongda Chen 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Finance, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou, CHINA
 
 
Online publication date: 2017-11-21
 
 
Publication date: 2017-11-21
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(12):7845-7863
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/77909
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (16)
 
This article belongs to the special issue "Problems of Application Analysis in Knowledge Management and Science-Mathematics-Education".
KEYWORDS
option game
real option
innovation public-private partnership
 
TOPICS
Evaluation and Assessment
Mathematics Education
 
ABSTRACT
This article develops a model of real option game to analyze effect of asymmetric government subsidy on the investment thresholds of private investors who compete with each other in the same market with uncertain price. The optimal investment thresholds of innovator and imitator are derived, and the effects of some key variables, such as inflation rate, interest rate, and degree of intellectual property protection, on those thresholds were analyzed. With the help of our model and a numerical example of sewage treatment industry, we demonstrate that subsidy to both innovator and imitator reduces optimal investment thresholds, while subsidy only to innovator raises the investment thresholds rather than reducing them. Based on the results of our study, we suggest that the government should offer subsidy to both of innovator and imitator indiscriminately, raise the overall level of IP protection, and reduce the financial cost for private investors in order to motivate them to invest in PPP projects.
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Carbonara, N., Costantino, N., & Pellegrino, R. (2014). Concession period for PPPs: A win-win model for a fair risk sharing. International Journal of Project Management, 32(7), 1223-1232.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Cerqueti, R., Tramontana, F., & Ventura, M. (2015). On the coexistence of innovators and imitators. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 90, 487-496.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Chen, R. D., Wang, Z., & Yu, L. A. (2017). Importance Sampling for Credit Portfolio Risk with Risk Factors Having t-Copula. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 16(4), 1101–1124.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Choi, J. H., Chung, J., & Lee, D. J. (2010). Risk perception analysis: Participation in China’s water PPP market. International Journal of Project Management, 28(6), 580-592.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Dixit, A., & Pindyck, R. (1994). Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Grenadier, S. R. (1996). The strategic exercise of option: development cascades and overbuilding in real estate markets. The Journal of Finance, 51(5), 1653-1679.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Kurniawan, F., Mudjanarko, S. W., & Ogunlana, S. (2015). Best practice for financial models of PPP projects. Procedia Engineering, 125, 124-132.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Martzoukos, S. H., & Zacharias, E. (2008). Real option games with R&D and learning spillovers. Omega, 41(2), 236-249.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Pawlina, G., & Kort, P. M. (2006). Real options in an asymmetric duopoly: who benefits from your competitive disadvantage? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 15(1), 1-35.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Pei, S.-Y. (2008). Treatment cost of sewage treatment plant. Environment Engineering, 26, 55-57.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Scandizzo, P. L., & Ventura, M. (2016). Innovation and imitation as an interactive process. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(8), 821-851.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Smets, F. R. (1991). Exporting versus FDI: the effect of uncertainty, irreversibility and strategic interactions. Working Paper, Yale University, New Haven, USA.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Suttinon, P., Bhatti, A. M., & Nasu, S. (2012). Option games in water infrastructure investment. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management, 138(3), 268-276.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Wang, Y. P. (2016). A Study on Kinmen Resident’s Perception of Tourism Development and Culture Heritage Impact. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(12).
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
You, D., Yang, X., Wu, D.-D., & Chen, G. (2014). Option game with Poisson jump process in company radical technological innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81(1), 341-350.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Zhu, W., Zhu, Z., Fang, S., & Pan, W. (2017). Chinese Students’ Awareness of Relationship between Green Finance, Environmental Protection Education and Real Situation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(7), 3753-3769.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top