RESEARCH PAPER
Analysis of primary school students’ process of understanding about the concept of ratio: A view from the Pirie-Kieren theory
 
More details
Hide details
1
Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla, COLOMBIA
 
2
I. E. T. C. Francisco Javier Cisnero, Puerto Colombia, COLOMBIA
 
3
Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, COLOMBIA
 
4
Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Chilpancingo, MEXICO
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-11-26
 
 
Publication date: 2024-12-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(12):em2542
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The understanding process of primary education students was analyzed when they solve tasks related to the concept of ratio. The study was based on the theoretical framework of Pirie and Kieren (1994). The methodology was qualitative with the case study method. The study was carried out in three stages: planning, development and analysis, using the field observation technique. Data collection was carried out through a task and an interview. The data were analyzed based on theoretical articulation. The results revealed that students lack the prior knowledge necessary to understand the concept of ratio. In conclusion, it can be noted that students do not present logical arguments to formalize the concept, and their understanding process is reduced to memorization or the use of mathematical strategies without understanding the relationship between the task and the mathematical concept.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Albert, L., & Kim, R. (2015). Applying CCSSM definition of understanding to assess students mathematical learning. In Assessment to enhance teaching and learning (pp. 233-246). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
 
2.
Andini, W., & Jupri, A. (2017). Student obstacles in ratio and proportion learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812, Article 012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
 
3.
Arenas-Peñaloza, J., & Rodríguez-Vásquez, F. (2022). Understanding ratio through the Pirie-Kieren model. Acta Scientiae, 24(4), 24-56. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.....
 
4.
Arnon, I., Cottril, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktaç, A., Roa, S., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-....
 
5.
Caballero, A., Martínez, L., & Bernandez, J. (1970). Matemáticas, tercer curso [Mathematics, third grade]. Esfinge.
 
6.
Cervantes-Barraza, J., Berrío-Valbuena, J., Contreras-Vásquez, M., & Martínez-Fontalvo, V. (2021). Espacios de trabajo geométrico personal de profesores de matemáticas en formación [Personal geometric workspaces for mathematics teachers in training]. Educación y Humanismo, 23(40), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhu....
 
7.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131....
 
8.
Fauziah, N., & Cahya M.A, E. (2021). Students’ difficulties in solving ratios and proportional relationships problems. In Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Education and Science Conference. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.19....
 
9.
García-García, J. I., Encarnación Baltazar, E. J., & Arredondo, E. H. (2020). Exploración de la comprensión gráfica de estudiantes de secundaria [Exploring high school students’ graphic understanding]. Revista de Investigación Educativa de la REDIECH, 11, Article e925. https://doi.org/10.33010/ie_ri....
 
10.
Heinz, K., & Sterba-Boatwright, B. (2008). Connecting research to teaching: The when and why of using proportions. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 101(7), 528-533. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.101....
 
11.
Hiebert J., & Carpenter T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
 
12.
Kastberg, S. E. (2002). Understanding mathematical concepts: The case of the logarithmic function [PhD thesis, The University of Georgia].
 
13.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
 
14.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.), Mathematics learning study committee, center for education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education (pp. 115–156). National Academy Press.
 
15.
Patmaniar, Amin, S. M., & Sulaiman, R. (2021). Students’ growing understanding in solving mathematics problems based on gender: Elaborating folding back. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(3), 507-530. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12....
 
16.
Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterise it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 165-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0127....
 
17.
Pouta, M., Lehtinen, E., & Palonen, T. (2021). Student teachers’ and experienced teachers’ professional vision of students’ understanding of the rational number concept. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648....
 
18.
Rodríguez-Nieto, C. A., Cabrales-González, H. A., Arenas-Peñaloza, J., Schnorr, C. E., & Font, V. (2024). Onto-semiotic analysis of Colombian engineering students’ mathematical connections to problems-solving on vectors: A contribution to the natural and exact sciences. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(5), em2438. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
19.
Rodríguez-Nieto, C. A., Rodríguez-Vásquez, F. M., & Font, V. (2023). Combined use of the extended theory of connections and the onto-semiotic approach to analyze mathematical connections by relating the graphs of f and f’. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 114(1), 63-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
20.
Rodríguez-Vásquez, F., & Arenas-Peñaloza, J. (2021). Categories to assess the understanding of university students about a mathematical concept. Acta Scientiae, 23(1), 102-135. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.....
 
21.
Şengül, S., & Kıral Demir, B. (2024). Öğretmen adaylarının rasyonel sayılara ilişkin zihin haritaları: Pirie-Kieren teorisi [Prospective teachers’ mind maps regarding rational numbers: Pirie-Kieren theory]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 53(241), 133-164. https://doi.org/10.37669/milli....
 
22.
Sierpinska, A. (1990). Some remarks on understanding in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 10(3), 24-36.
 
23.
Skemp, R. (1980). Psicología del aprendizaje de las matemáticas [Psychology of mathematics learning]. Morata S.A.
 
24.
Syafiqoh N, Amin S., & Siswono T. (2018). Analysis of student’s understanding of exponential concept: A perspective of Pirie-Kieren theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108, Article 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
 
25.
Wahyuningrum, A. S., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi. (2017). Epistemological obstacles on the topic of ratio and proportion among junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
 
26.
Wahyuningrum, A., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi, T. (2023). Students’ prior knowledge as an ontogenic obstacle on the topic of ratio and proportion. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 17(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.1....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top