RESEARCH PAPER
Assessing conceptual difficulties experienced by pre-service chemistry teachers in organic chemistry
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Mathematics, Sciences and Technology Education, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, SOUTH AFRICA
Online publication date: 2024-02-01
Publication date: 2024-01-26
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(2):em2398
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Organic chemistry is a mandatory component of chemistry II and chemistry III within the
curriculum for pre-service chemistry teachers (PSCTs) pursuing a degree in chemistry teaching.
The organic chemistry course sequence is well recognized as challenging and unapproachable for
students, despite its significant relevance and impact across several sectors. While efforts have
been made to recognize and deal with challenges faced by students in the cognitive and
psychomotor aspects, there has been less attention given to identifying PSCTs’ conceptual
difficulties and misconceptions of organic chemistry. This includes the subsequent strategies to
design instructions to enhance students’ learning experiences, which are crucial elements in
addressing their achievements in organic chemistry. The study aimed to identify the conceptual
difficulties and misconceptions encountered by PSCTs in organohalides and stereochemistry.
Furthermore, the study aimed to suggest strategies to enhance PSCTs’ understanding of the
course. The study was situated within the theoretical framework of constructivism and employed
an interpretivist qualitative case study design. The population under study consisted of all
individuals who were enrolled in the Bachelor of Education program within the faculty of
educational sciences. A cohort of 33 whole-class PSCTs who had registered for the chemistry III
course, where organohalides and stereochemistry were taught as units, were purposefully
selected to participate in the study. The main instruments were document analysis, formal written
tests, and interviews. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The study revealed that PSCTs
encountered difficulties when attempting to solve problems related to organohalides and
stereochemistry. In addition, PSCTs had misconceptions about these concepts. The study,
therefore, recommends the implementation of suitable and appropriate instructional strategies
to enhance PSCTs’ conceptual understanding and reduce misconceptions.
REFERENCES (39)
1.
Alsfouk, A. A. (2022). Innovation and validation of an assessment method using molecular models following stereochemistry instruction in an organic chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(5), 1900-1905.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
2.
Anderson, T. L., & Bodner, G. M. (2008). What can we do about ‘Parker’? A case study of a good student who didn’t ‘get’ organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(2), 93-101.
https://doi.org/10.1039/b80622....
3.
Anim-Eduful, B., & Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2022a). Chemistry students’ conceptual understanding of organic qualitative analysis. Pedagogical Research, 7(4), em0132.
https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12....
4.
Anim-Eduful, B., & Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2022b). Factors influencing high school chemistry teachers’ and students’ teaching and learning of organic qualitative analysis: A qualitative study. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(7), 194-219.
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.....
5.
Anzovino, M. E., & Bretz, S. L. (2015). Organic chemistry students’ ideas about nucleophiles and electrophiles: The role of charges and mechanisms. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 16, 797–810.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00....
6.
Asmussen, G., Rodemer, M., & Bernholt, S. (2023). Blooming student difficulties in dealing with organic reaction mechanisms: An attempt at systemization. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24, 1035-1054.
https://doi.org/10.1039/d2rp00....
7.
Ayalew, T. (2015). Assessment of undergraduate chemistry students’ difficulties in organic chemistry. Unisa Press.
8.
Berisha, E. (2020). Creating a classroom environment where students feel comfortable asking questions and seeking clarification is important for promoting active engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 589-602.
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu000....
9.
Blöte, A., Burg, E., & Klein, A. (2001). Students’ flexibility in solving two-digit addition and subtraction problems: Instruction effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 627-638.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0....
11.
Cartrette D. P., & Mayo P. M. (2011). Students’ understanding of acids/bases in organic chemistry contexts, Chemical Education Research and Practice, 12, 29-39.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c1rp90....
12.
Durmaz, M. (2018). Determination of prospective chemistry teachers’ cognitive structures and misconceptions about stereochemistry. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(9), 13-20.
https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.....
13.
Galloway, K. R., & Bretz, S. L. (2015). Measuring meaningful learning in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory: A national, cross-sectional study. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(12), 2006-2018.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
14.
Gilmore, M. W., Wilkerson, D., & Hassan, R. (2017). The effect of preconceived notions and the lack of fundamental skills while taking general chemistry. Atlas Journal of Science Education, 2(1), 70-76.
https://doi.org/10.5147/ajse.v....
15.
Hanson, R. (2017). Enhancing students’ performance in organic chemistry through context-based learning and micro activities case study. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 5(6), 7-20.
17.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75-83.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
18.
Keller, D., & Hermanns, J. (2023). The digital task navigator as a scaffold for supporting higher education students while solving tasks in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(10), 3818-3824.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
19.
Kose, S. (2008). Diagnosing student misconceptions: Using drawings as a research method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 283-293.
20.
Kumi, B., Olimpo, J., Bartlett, F., & Dixon, B. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of organic chemistry textbooks in promoting representational fluency and understanding of 2d-3d diagrammatic relationships. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 177-187.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp20....
21.
Luxford, C. J., & Bretz, S. L. (2014). Development of the bonding representations inventory to identify student misconceptions about covalent and ionic bonding representations. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(3), 312-320.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ed4007....
22.
McClary, L. M., & Bretz, S. L. (2012). Development and assessment of a diagnostic tool to identify organic chemistry students’ alternative conceptions related to acid strength. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2317-2341.
https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
23.
McMurry, J. E. (2010). Fundamentals of organic chemistry. Cengage Learning.
24.
O’Dwyer, A., & Childs, P. E. (2017). Who says organic chemistry is difficult? Exploring perspectives and perceptions. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3599-3620.
https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
25.
Oladejo, A. I., Ademola, I. A., Ayanwale, M. A., & O., T. D. (2023). Concept difficulty in secondary school chemistry: An intra-play of gender, school location and school type. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 255.
https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.....
26.
Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345-375.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
27.
Popova, M., & Bretz, S. L. (2018). Organic chemistry students’ understandings of what makes a good leaving group. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(7), 1094-1101.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
28.
Prodjosantoso, A., Hertina, A., & Irwanto, I. (2019). The misconception diagnosis on ionic and covalent bonds concepts with three-tier diagnostic test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1477-1488.
https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2....
29.
Salame, I. I., & Khalil, A. Y. (2023). Examining some of the challenges students face in learning about rearrangement reactions in organic chemistry. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 19(3), e2310.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese....
30.
Silva, J., Uchoa, D., Lima, M., & Monteiro, A. (2019). Stereochemistry game: Creating and playing a fun board game to engage students in reviewing stereochemistry concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(8), 1680-1685.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
31.
Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168....
32.
Stroumpouli, C., & Tsaparlis, G. (2022). Chemistry students’ conceptual difficulties and problem-solving behavior in chemical kinetics, as a component of an introductory physical chemistry course. Chemistry Teacher International, 4(3), 279-296.
https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-20....
33.
Taber, K. S. (2019). The nature of the chemical concept: Re-constructing chemical knowledge in teaching and learning. Royal Society of Chemistry.
https://doi.org/10.1039/978178....
34.
Widarti, H. R., Retnosari, R., & Marfu’ah, S. (2017). Misconception of pre-service chemistry teachers about the concept of resonances in organic chemistry course. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868, 030014.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995....
35.
Windschitl, M., & Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 145-160.
https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-1....
36.
Xue, D., & Stains M. (2020). Exploring students’ understanding of resonance and its relationship to instruction, Journal of Chemical Education, 97, 894-902.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
37.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE.
38.
York, T. T., & Orgill, M. K. (2020). Continuously improving teaching skills through professional development and staying updated on the latest pedagogical approaches and research in chemistry education is essential. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2673-2682.
39.
Zoller, U., & Tsaparlis, G. (1997). Higher and lower-order cognitive skills: The case of chemistry. Research in Science Education, 27, 117-130.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0246....