Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
RESEARCH PAPER
Characteristics of Secondary Students who have Intentions to Choose a STEM Major in College: Findings from a Three-Year Study
1
Research Scientist, Director of Research, Harmony Public Schools, 9321 W Sam Houston Pkwy S, Houston, TX 77099, USA
2
Texas A&M University College Station, USA
Publication date: 2020-12-21
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2020;16(12):em1922
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study was grounded in the social cognitive career theoretical framework (Lent, Brown, &
Hackett, 1994). The purpose of this four-year longitudinal study was to examine the factors that
may have contributed to students’ motivation to develop STEM interest during secondary school
years. The participants in our study were 9th- 11th grade high school students from a large K-12
college preparatory charter school system, Harmony Public Schools (HPS) in Texas. We utilized
descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses to carry out the study. The results revealed
that three-year survey takers’ STEM major interest seemed to decrease steadily each year.
Although there was a significant gender gap between males and females in STEM selection in 9th
and 10th grade, this difference was not significant at the end of 11th grade. White and Asian
students were significantly more likely to be interested in STEM careers. We also found that
students who were most likely to choose a STEM major in college had higher parent and teacher
expectations, higher math and science self-efficacy, higher GPA grades, took more AP courses,
and participated in STEM clubs.
REFERENCES (76)
1.
American College Testing (2016). The condition of STEM 2016. Retrieved from https://www.act.org/content/da....
2.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881-908. https://doi.org/10.3102/000283....
3.
Andersen, L., & Ward, T. J. (2014). Expectancy‐value models for the STEM persistence plans of ninth‐grade, high‐ability Students: A comparison between black, Hispanic, and white students. Science Education, 98(2), 216-242. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21....
4.
ASTRA’s 2018 STEM Innovation Vital Signs Series (2018). Texas’ 2018 STEM & innovation report cardTM. Retrieved from https://www.usinnovation.org/s....
5.
ASTRA’s 2017 STEM Innovation Vital Signs Series (2017). Texas’ 2017 STEM & innovation report cardTM. Received from https://www.usinnovation.org/s....
6.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Bandura, A. (2006). Going global with social cognitive theory: From prospect to paydirt. In S. I. Donaldson, D. E. Berger, & K. Pezdek (Eds.), The rise of applied psychology: New frontiers and rewarding careers (pp. 53-70). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Beede, D. N., Julian, T. A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. E. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1....
9.
Blickenstaff, C. J. (2005). Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/095402....
10.
Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M., & Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95(6), 1049-1065. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20....
11.
BusinessEurope. (2011). Plugging the Skills Gap - The clock is ticking (science, technology and maths). Brussels, Belgium: Author. Retrieved from https://www.businesseurope.eu/....
12.
Chittum, J. R., Jones, B. D., Akalin, S., & Schram. (2017). The effects of an afterschool STEM program on students’ motivation and engagement. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(11), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594....
13.
Crosnoe, R., & Muller, C. (2014). Family socioeconomic status, peers, and the path to college. Social Problems, 61(4), 602-624. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.201....
14.
Dabney, K. P., Tai, R. H., Almarode, J. T., Miller-Friedmann, J. L., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Hazari, Z. (2012). Out-of-school time science activities and their association with career interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/215484....
15.
DeWitt, J., Archer, L., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2011). High aspirations but low progression: The science aspirations-careers paradox amongst minority ethnic students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 243-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
16.
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and Eccles et al. Model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C.S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105-121). New York: Guilford.
17.
Eccles, J. S., & Wang, M. T. (2016). What motivates females and males to pursue careers in mathematics and science? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502....
18.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
19.
Ekmekci, A., Sahin, A., & Waxman, H. (2019). Factors affecting students’ STEM choice and persistence: A synthesis of research and findings from the second year of a longitudinal high school STEM tracking study. In A. Sahin, & M. Mohr-Schroeder (Eds). Myths and truths: What has years of stem education research in k-12 taught us? Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Brill.
20.
Ferry, T. R., Fouad, N. A., & Smith, P. L. (2000). The role of family context in a social cognitive model for career-related choice behavior: A math and science perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(3), 348-364. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1....
21.
Fouad, N. A., & Santana, M. C. (2017). SCCT and underrepresented populations in STEM fields: Moving the needle. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907....
22.
Frank, K. A., Muller, C., Schiller, K. S., Riegle-Crumb, C., Mueller, A. S., Crosnoe, R., & Pearson, J. (2008). The social dynamics of mathematics course taking in high school. American Journal of Sociology, 113(6), 1645-1696. https://doi.org/10.1086/587153.
23.
Friday Institute for Educational Innovation (2012). Middle and high school STEM-student survey. Raleigh, NC: Author.
24.
Funk, C., & Parker, K. (2018). Women and men in STEM often at odds over workplace equity. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org.
25.
Garriott, P. O., Navarro, R. L., & Flores, L. Y. (2017). First-generation college students’ persistence intentions in engineering majors. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907....
26.
Gottfried, M. A., & Williams, D. (2013). STEM club participation and STEM schooling outcomes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(79), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.....
27.
Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66(3-4), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199....
28.
Hardin, E. E., & Longhurst, M. O. (2016). Understanding the gender gap: Social cognitive changes during an introductory stem course. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou000....
29.
Heaverlo, C. (2011). STEM development: A study of 6th-12th grade girls’ interest and confidence in mathematics and science. Retrieved from http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/....
30.
Heaverlo, C. A., Cooper, R., & Lannan, F. S. (2013). STEM development: Predictors for 6th-12th grade girls’ interest and confidence in science and math. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 19(2), 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1615/Jwomen....
31.
Hui, K., & Lent, R. W. (2018). The roles of family, culture, and social cognitive variables in the career interests and goals of Asian American college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(1), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou000....
32.
Icel, M., & Davis, M. (2018). STEM focused high school and university partnership: Alternative solution for senioritis issue and creating students’ STEM curiosity. Journal of STEM Education, 19(1), 14-22.
33.
Jackson, K. M., Suizzo, M. A., & Harvey, K. E. (2017). Connecting teacher perceptions to stem occupational goals in low income adolescents of color. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 23(1), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomen....
34.
LaForce, M., Noble, E., Zuo, H., & Ferris, K. (2018). Can inclusive STEM high school strategies reduce race & gender gaps in science attitudes? Chicago, IL: Outlier Research Evaluation, University of Chicago STEMEd | The University of Chicago.
35.
Lee, S. W., Min, S., & Mamerow, G. P. (2015). Pygmalion in the classroom and the home: Expectation’s role in the pipeline to STEMM. Teachers College Record, 117(9), 1-36.
36.
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (1996). Social cognitive approach to career development: An overview. The Career Development Quarterly, 44(4), 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161....
37.
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). On conceptualizing and assessing social cognitive constructs in career research: A measurement guide. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 12-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907....
38.
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2013). Social cognitive model of career self-management: Toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(4), 557-568. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00334....
39.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1....
40.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In D. Brown (Ed.) Career choice and development (4th ed.), (pp. 255-311). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
42.
Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among US students. Science Education, 95(5), 877-907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20....
43.
Mau, W. C. J., & Li, J. (2018). Factors influencing STEM career aspirations of underrepresented high school students. The Career Development Quarterly, 66(3), 246-258. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12....
44.
Mau, W. C. J., Perkins, V. J., & Mau, Y. H. (2016). Gender and racial differences in career decision-making dispositions of college students enrolled in STEM majors. Universal Journal of Psychology, 4(6), 254-260. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujp.2....
45.
Means, B., Wang, H., Young, V., Peters, V. L., & Lynch, S. J. (2016). STEM‐focused high schools as a strategy for enhancing readiness for postsecondary STEM programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 709-736. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21....
46.
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327....
47.
Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2016). Science achievement gaps begin very early, persist, and are largely explained by modifiable factors. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
48.
Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2014). A survey of psychological, motivational, family and perceptions of physics education factors that explain 15-year-old students’ aspirations to study physics in post-compulsory English schools. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 371-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
49.
Munce, R., & Fraser, E. (2012). Where are the STEM students? What are their career interests? Where are the STEM jobs? Retrieved from https://www.dailyherald.com/as....
50.
National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators 2018 (NSB-2018-1). Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics....
51.
National Science Foundation (NSF). (2010). NSF STEM classification of instructional programs crosswalk. Retrieved from https://www.lsamp.org/help/hel....
52.
National Science Foundation. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017 digest (NSF 17-310). Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved from www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
53.
Noonan, R. (2017). STEM Jobs: 2017 Update (ESA Issue Brief # 02-17). Washington, DC: Office of the Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved from http://www.esa.gov/reports/ste....
54.
Riegle-Crumb, C., Farkas, G., & Muller, C. (2006). The role of gender and friendship in advanced course taking. Sociology of Education, 79(3), 206-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804....
55.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectations and pupils’ intellectual development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
56.
Rozek, C. S., Svoboda, R. C., Harackiewicz, J. M., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2017). Utility-value intervention with parents increases students’ STEM preparation and career pursuit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(5), 909-914. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1....
57.
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411-427. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21....
58.
Sahin, A. (2013). STEM clubs and science fair competitions: Effects on post-secondary matriculation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(1), 7-13.
59.
Sahin, A., & Top, N. (2015). STEM students on the stage (sos): Promoting student voice and choice in STEM education through an interdisciplinary, standards-focused project-based learning approach. Journal of STEM Education: Innovation and Research. 16(3), 24-33.
60.
Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adiguzel, T. (2014). STEM-related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 13-26.
61.
Sahin, A., Ekmekci, A., & Waxman, H. C. (2017a). Collective effects of individual, behavioral, and contextual Factors on high school students’ future STEM career plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
62.
Sahin, A., Gulacar, O., & Stuessy, C. (2014). High school students’ perceptions of the effects of science Olympiad on their STEM career aspirations and 21st century skill development. Research in Science Education, 45(6), 785-805.
63.
Sass, T. R. (2015). Understanding the STEM pipeline (CALDER #125). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
64.
Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (4th ed.). Columbus. OH: Pearson.
65.
Sevdalis, C., & Skoumios, M. (2014). Non-formal and informal science learning: Teachers’ conceptions. International Journal of Science in Society, 5(4), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.18848/1836-....
66.
Shells, T. (2015). Expectations of teachers, administrators, and parents for the academic achievement of students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
67.
Shumow, L., & Schmidt, J. A. (2013). Academic grades and motivation in high school science classrooms among male and female students: Associations with teachers’ characteristics, beliefs and practices. Journal of Education Research, 7(1), 53-72.
68.
Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2017). Factors that contributed to gifted students’ success on STEM pathways: The role of race, personal interests, and aspects of high school experience. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(2), 99-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235....
69.
Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143-1144. https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc....
70.
Taskinen, P. H., Dietrich, J., & Kracke, B. (2016). The role of parental values and child-specific expectations in the science motivation and achievement of adolescent girls and boys. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 8(1), 103-123.
71.
Thomas, J. A., & Strunk, K. K. (2017). Expectancy‐value and children’s science achievement: Parents matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 693-712. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21....
72.
Uitto, A. (2014). Interest, attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs explaining upper secondary school students’ orientation towards biology related careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 1425-1444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
73.
Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081-1121. https://doi.org/10.3102/000283....
74.
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648....
75.
Xue, Y., & Larson, R. C. (2015, May). STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes and yes. Monthly Labor Review (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics). https://doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2....
76.
Yu, S. L., Corkin, D. M., & Martin, J. P. (2017). STEM motivation and persistence among underrepresented minority students: A social cognitive perspective. In J. T. DeCuir-Gunby & P. A. Schutz (Eds.), Race and ethnicity in the study of motivation in education (pp. 67-81). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
