RESEARCH PAPER
Corporate Governance, Professional Education, and Employee Bonus in High-Tech Industry- Evidence from Taiwan
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Tourism / Accounting, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, TAIWAN, R.O.C.
Online publication date: 2017-09-15
Publication date: 2017-09-15
Corresponding author
Lin Wen Hsiang
Department of Tourism and Accounting, I-Shou University, No.1, Sec. 1, Syuecheng Rd., Dashu District, Kaohsiung City 84001,Taiwan, R.O.C.
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(9):6303-6311
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
High-tech industry plays the role of motivator in the economic development in Taiwan, revealing that high-tech industry is not simply the most important breadwinner in Taiwan, but also the powerful backing of national competitive advantage under the globally competitive system. High-tech industry requires the engagement of excellent talents, but the staff turnover rate is commonly high. A lot of businesses therefore apply employee bonus and the high development of high-tech industry as the incentives to recruit and retain talents. In this case, it is important for high-tech industry understanding the factor in employee bonus and further discussing the relationship among current corporate governance mechanism, professional education, and employee bonus for the sustainable development. Taking domestic listed high-tech companies as the research objects, the database of Taiwan Economic Journal and Taiwan Patent Gazette are the data sources to collect the companies’ financial statement, patent, and stock price data for the empirical research. The research results conclude the significantly positive correlations between 1) corporate governance and employee bonus, 2) professional education and corporate governance, and 3) professional education and employee bonus. Finally, conclusion and suggestions are proposed, expecting to assist high-tech businesses in promoting the employee bonus system.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Adams, R. B., & Mehran, H. (2012). Bank board structure and performance: Evidence for large bank holding companies. Journal of financial Intermediation, 21(2), 243-267.
2.
Aebi, V., Sabato, G., & Schmid, M. (2012). Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3213-3226.
3.
Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (2012). Corporate governance and firm performance. In C. R. Thomas & W. F. Shughart II (Eds.), Oxford Handbook in Managerial Economics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
Badolato, P. G., Donelson, D. C., & Ege, M. (2013), Audit committee financial expertise and earnings management: The role of status. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 208-230.
5.
Beaudoin, C. A., Cianci, A. M., &Tsakumis, G. T. (2015). The impact of CFOs’ incentives and earnings management ethics on their financial reporting decisions: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 505-518.
6.
Blaylock, B. S. (2012). Do managers extract economically significant rents through tax aggressive transactions? Working paper, Oklahoma State University.
7.
Chan, K., Chen, H.-K., Hong, L.-H., & Wang, Y. (2015). Stock market valuation of R&D expenditures—the role of corporate governance. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 31, 78-93.
8.
Charles, K., Frank G., & Rajdeep, G. (2016). Washing Away Your Sins? Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Irresponsibility, and Firm Performance. Journal of Marketing, 80(2), 59-79.
9.
Cho, S. Y., Lee, C., & Pfeiffer, R. J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(1), 71-83.
10.
Cohen, J. R., Hoitash, U., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2014). The effect of audit committee industry expertise on monitoring the financial reporting process. The Accounting Review, 89(1), 243-273.
11.
Demirtas, K. O., & Cornaggia, K. G. (2013). Initial credit ratings and earnings management. Review of Financial Economics, 22(4), 135–145.
12.
Erkens, D. H., Hung, M., & Matos, P. (2012). Corporate governance in the 2007–2008 financial crisis: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(2), 389-411.
13.
Filbeck, G., Gorman, R., & Zhao, X. (2013). Barron’s most respected companies. Accounting and Finance, 53, 623-641.
14.
Habib, A., Uddin Bhuiyan, B., & Islam, A. (2013). Financial distress, earnings management and market pricing of accruals during the global financial crisis. Managerial Finance, 39(2), 155-180.
15.
Harjoto, M., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 641-660.
16.
Hsieh, C. C., & Wu, S. J. (2012). Monitoring the monitors: The effect of banking industry reform on earnings management behavior in an emerging market. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(5), 451-473.
17.
Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 601-615.
18.
Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of business ethics, 114(2), 207-223.
19.
Lee, K.-H., Min, B., & Yook, K.-H. (2015). The impacts of carbon (CO2) emissions and environmental research and development (R&D) investment on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 1-11.
20.
Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92.
21.
Madorran, C., & Garcia, T. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The spanish case. Responsabilidad social corporativa y desempeño financeiro: El caso español, 56(1), 20-28.
22.
Naiker, V., Sharma, D. S., & Sharma, V. D. (2013). Do former audit firm partners on audit committees procure greater nonaudit services from the auditor? The Accounting Review, 88(1), 297-326.
23.
Oh, W., & Park, S. (2015). The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance in Korea. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 51, 85-94.
24.
Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2014). The effects of corporate social performance on the cost of corporate debt and credit ratings. Financial Review, 49(1), 49-75.
25.
Qian, M., & Yeung, B. Y. (2015). Bank financing and corporate governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 258-270.
26.
Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Diversity, Gender, Strategy and Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327-347.
27.
Tan, T. K. (2012). Financial distress and firm performance: Evidence from the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Finance and Accountancy, 11(1).
28.
Van der Colff, F. (2015). Predicting financial distress using financial and non-financial variables. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 8(1), 243-260.
29.
Wang, Y. J., Hou, H., & Khan, W. (2012). Foreign institutional ownership and firm dividend payout: the case of Taiwan. Journal of Emerging Market, 11, 72-80.
30.
Zagorchev, A., & Gao, L. (2015). Corporate governance and performance of financial institutions. Journal of Economics and Business, 82, 17-41.