RESEARCH PAPER
Developing Students’ Curiosity Through Chemistry Hands-on Activities: A Case of Selected Community Secondary Schools in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Rwanda-College of Education (African Center of Excellence for Innovative teaching of Mathematics and Science, RWANDA
 
2
University of Rwanda-College of Education (UR-CE), P.O Box 55 Rwamagana, RWANDA
 
3
Makerere University, Department of Science, Technical and Vocational Education (DSTVE), P.O. Box 7062 Kampala, UGANDA
 
 
Publication date: 2021-04-27
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2021;17(5):em1962
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Curiosity is the inner drive for learning or ‘hunger for learning’ which is among the twenty-first-century learning competencies. Students in their earliest stage ought to exhibit curiosity to stir-up knowledge acquisition and exploration, yet the development of curiosity in the context of education is considered to be unusual. This research assesses how chemistry students develop and express curiosity in a hands-on learning environment. A sample of 169 senior three students from three community secondary schools in Dar es Salaam was involved in this study. Besides, the study examined how hands-on activities in chemistry lessons can be incorporated as a pedagogical practice to foster students’ curiosity. The study employed a convergent mixed method design in (QUAL+quant) form following a pragmatic stance. We used lesson observations, interviews, and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) to gather qualitative data while quantitative data were obtained through the Students’ Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SSRQ) and Teacher Rating Scale (TRS). It was revealed that hands-on activities can successfully be used when teachers share success criteria and learning intentions of a particular lesson. The overall results showed a significant increase in students’ curiosity due to the implementation of hands-on activities as an instructional strategy. In this perspective, we advocate for hands-on activities to be used frequently in chemistry lesson sessions and more studies should be done further on students’ curiosity in the field of education.
REFERENCES (50)
1.
Affine, T. A. (2012). The zone of proximal development in early childhood education (Thesis). Laurea University of Applied Sciences.
 
2.
Basit, T. (2003). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research, 45(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/001318....
 
3.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.
 
4.
Borowske, K. (2005). Curiosity and motivation-to-learn [Paper presentation]. ACRL Twelfth National Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, April 7-10, 2005.
 
5.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn (Vol. 11). National Academy Press.
 
6.
Bufkin, M. A. (2006). Qualitative Studies: Developing Good Research Questions. Online Submission. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED49433....
 
7.
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage Publications, Inc. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinf....
 
8.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th Ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020....
 
9.
Creemers, B. P. M., Κυριακίδης, Λ., & Sammons, P. (2010). Methodological advances in educational effectiveness research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020....
 
10.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Merril.
 
11.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.
 
12.
Fani, T., & Ghaemi, F. (2011). Implications of Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development (ZPD) in teacher education: ZPTD and self-scaffolding. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1549-1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsp....
 
13.
Fuad, M., Deb, D., Etim, J., & Gloster, C. (2018). Mobile response system: A novel approach to interactive and hands-on activity in the classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(2), 493-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423....
 
14.
Glassman, M. (2001). Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, experience, and inquiry in educational practice. Educational Researcher, 30(4), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
 
15.
Goldkuhl, G. (2012). Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2....
 
16.
Gupta, P., Gupta, P., Sharma, Y., & Sharma, Y. (2019). Nurturing Scientific Creativity in Science Classroom. Resonance, 24(05), 561-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045....
 
17.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/237273....
 
18.
Hirça, N. (2013). The influence of hands on physics experiments on scientific process skills according to prospective teachers’ experiences. European Journal of Physics Education, 4(1), 1-9.
 
19.
Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in Science Education, 40(5), 743-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
20.
Houghton, C., Casey, D., Shaw, D., & Murphy, K. (2013). Rigour in qualitative case-study research. Nurse Researcher, 20(4), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2013....
 
21.
Jirout, J., & Klahr, D. (2012). Children’s scientific curiosity: In search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Developmental Review, 32(2), 125-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2....
 
22.
Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(3), 291-305. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327....
 
23.
Kelly, A. E., & Lesh, R. A. (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://search.ebscohost.com/lo....
 
24.
Khasawneh, O. M., Miqdadi, R. M., & Hijazi, A. Y. (2014). Implementing pragmatism and John Dewey’s educational philosophy in Jordanian public schools. Journal of International Education Research, 10(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.....
 
25.
Kidd, C., & Hayden, B. Y. (2015). The Psychology and Neuroscience of Curiosity. Neuron, 88(3), 449-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
 
26.
Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.31....
 
27.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2002). Designing and conducting focus group interviews. In Social Analysis, Selected Tools and Techniques (pp. 4-23).
 
28.
Lamnina, M., & Chase, C. C. (2019). Developing a thirst for knowledge: How uncertainty in the classroom influences curiosity affect, learning, and transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedp....
 
29.
Lee, K. L., Woh-Un, T., Ngoh-Khang, G. O. H., & Lian-Sai, C. (2001). The predicting role of cognitive variables in problem solving in mole concept. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2(3), 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1039/B1RP90....
 
30.
Lindholm, M. (2018). Promoting curiosity?: Possibilities and pitfalls in science education. Science & Education, 27(9-10), 987-1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
31.
Litman, J. (2005). Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information. Cognition & Emotion, 19(6), 793-814. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999....
 
32.
Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2003). Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327....
 
33.
Lui, A. (2012). Teaching in the Zone: An introduction to working within the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) to drive effective early childhood instruction. Children’s Progress, 1-10.
 
34.
McLafferty, I. (2004). Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(2), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
 
35.
Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed). Sage.
 
36.
Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 1045-1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780....
 
37.
Olson, E. (1986). Measurement of curiosity in junior high school students (Dissertation). Iowa State University.
 
38.
Opara, F., & Waswa, P. (2013). Enhancing Students’ Achievement in Chemistry through the Piagetian Model: The Learning Cycle. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 4(4), 1270-1278. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijcds....
 
39.
Ostroff, W. L. (2016). Cultivating curiosity in K-12 classrooms: How to promote and sustain deep learning. ASCD.
 
40.
Oudeyer, P.-Y., Gottlieb, J., & Lopes, M. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, curiosity, and learning: Theory and applications in educational technologies. In Progress in brain research (Vol. 229, pp. 257-284). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr....
 
41.
Pirttimaa, M., Husu, J., & Metsarinne, M. (2015). Uncovering procedural knowledge in craft, design, and technology education: A case of hands-on activities in electronics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798....
 
42.
Pluck, G., & Johnson, H. L. (2011). Stimulating curiosity to enhance learning. GESJ: Education Sciences and Psychology, 2(19), 24-31.
 
43.
Shahid, S., Bessarab, D., Howat, P., & Thompson, S. C. (2009). Exploration of the beliefs and experiences of Aboriginal people with cancer in Western Australia: A methodology to acknowledge cultural difference and build understanding. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2....
 
44.
Shannon-Baker, P. (2016). Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(4), 319-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/155868....
 
45.
Sikandar, A. (2016). John Dewey and his philosophy of education. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 2(2), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed....
 
46.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
47.
Talja, S. (1999). Analyzing qualitative interview data: The discourse analytic method. Library & Information Science Research, 21(4), 459-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-....
 
48.
Von Stumm, S., Hell, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 574-588. https://doi.org/10.1177/174569....
 
49.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed). Sage Publications.
 
50.
Zion, M., & Sadeh, I. (2007). Curiosity and open inquiry learning. Journal of Biological Education, 41(4), 162-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/002192....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top