Curiosity is the inner drive for learning or ‘hunger for learning’ which is among the twenty-first-century learning competencies. Students in their earliest stage ought to exhibit curiosity to stir-up knowledge acquisition and exploration, yet the development of curiosity in the context of
education is considered to be unusual. This research assesses how chemistry students develop
and express curiosity in a hands-on learning environment. A sample of 169 senior three students
from three community secondary schools in Dar es Salaam was involved in this study. Besides, the
study examined how hands-on activities in chemistry lessons can be incorporated as a
pedagogical practice to foster students’ curiosity. The study employed a convergent mixed
method design in (QUAL+quant) form following a pragmatic stance. We used lesson observations,
interviews, and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) to gather qualitative data while quantitative data
were obtained through the Students’ Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SSRQ) and Teacher Rating
Scale (TRS). It was revealed that hands-on activities can successfully be used when teachers share
success criteria and learning intentions of a particular lesson. The overall results showed a
significant increase in students’ curiosity due to the implementation of hands-on activities as an
instructional strategy. In this perspective, we advocate for hands-on activities to be used
frequently in chemistry lesson sessions and more studies should be done further on students’
curiosity in the field of education.
REFERENCES(50)
1.
Affine, T. A. (2012). The zone of proximal development in early childhood education (Thesis). Laurea University of Applied Sciences.
Basit, T. (2003). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research, 45(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/001318....
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.
Borowske, K. (2005). Curiosity and motivation-to-learn [Paper presentation]. ACRL Twelfth National Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, April 7-10, 2005.
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage Publications, Inc. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinf....
Creemers, B. P. M., Κυριακίδης, Λ., & Sammons, P. (2010). Methodological advances in educational effectiveness research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020....
Fani, T., & Ghaemi, F. (2011). Implications of Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development (ZPD) in teacher education: ZPTD and self-scaffolding. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1549-1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsp....
Fuad, M., Deb, D., Etim, J., & Gloster, C. (2018). Mobile response system: A novel approach to interactive and hands-on activity in the classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(2), 493-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423....
Glassman, M. (2001). Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, experience, and inquiry in educational practice. Educational Researcher, 30(4), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
Goldkuhl, G. (2012). Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2....
Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/237273....
Hirça, N. (2013). The influence of hands on physics experiments on scientific process skills according to prospective teachers’ experiences. European Journal of Physics Education, 4(1), 1-9.
Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in Science Education, 40(5), 743-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
Houghton, C., Casey, D., Shaw, D., & Murphy, K. (2013). Rigour in qualitative case-study research. Nurse Researcher, 20(4), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2013....
Jirout, J., & Klahr, D. (2012). Children’s scientific curiosity: In search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Developmental Review, 32(2), 125-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2....
Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(3), 291-305. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327....
Kelly, A. E., & Lesh, R. A. (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://search.ebscohost.com/lo....
Khasawneh, O. M., Miqdadi, R. M., & Hijazi, A. Y. (2014). Implementing pragmatism and John Dewey’s educational philosophy in Jordanian public schools. Journal of International Education Research, 10(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.....
Lamnina, M., & Chase, C. C. (2019). Developing a thirst for knowledge: How uncertainty in the classroom influences curiosity affect, learning, and transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedp....
Lee, K. L., Woh-Un, T., Ngoh-Khang, G. O. H., & Lian-Sai, C. (2001). The predicting role of cognitive variables in problem solving in mole concept. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2(3), 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1039/B1RP90....
Litman, J. (2005). Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information. Cognition & Emotion, 19(6), 793-814. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999....
Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2003). Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327....
Lui, A. (2012). Teaching in the Zone: An introduction to working within the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) to drive effective early childhood instruction. Children’s Progress, 1-10.
McLafferty, I. (2004). Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(2), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed). Sage.
Opara, F., & Waswa, P. (2013). Enhancing Students’ Achievement in Chemistry through the Piagetian Model: The Learning Cycle. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 4(4), 1270-1278. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijcds....
Oudeyer, P.-Y., Gottlieb, J., & Lopes, M. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, curiosity, and learning: Theory and applications in educational technologies. In Progress in brain research (Vol. 229, pp. 257-284). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr....
Pirttimaa, M., Husu, J., & Metsarinne, M. (2015). Uncovering procedural knowledge in craft, design, and technology education: A case of hands-on activities in electronics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798....
Shahid, S., Bessarab, D., Howat, P., & Thompson, S. C. (2009). Exploration of the beliefs and experiences of Aboriginal people with cancer in Western Australia: A methodology to acknowledge cultural difference and build understanding. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2....
Shannon-Baker, P. (2016). Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(4), 319-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/155868....
Sikandar, A. (2016). John Dewey and his philosophy of education. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 2(2), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed....
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
Von Stumm, S., Hell, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 574-588. https://doi.org/10.1177/174569....
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.