RESEARCH PAPER
Developing knower legitimation among disadvantaged learners during a science fair project planning intervention
More details
Hide details
1
University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, SOUTH AFRICA
Publication date: 2024-12-03
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(12):em2547
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Science fair projects require knowledge-building (knower legitimation), whereas school science
focuses on knowledge reproduction (knowledge legitimation), particularly in disadvantaged
contexts. This mixed-methods case study investigates the rate, success, and retarding factors
relevant to knowledge-knower legitimation within a 6-hour science fair project planning
intervention for grade 9 South African learners from disadvantaged backgrounds. The 756
questions written by 86 participants were categorized according to knowledge-knower
legitimation, logic, and comprehensibility for four points across the intervention. Additionally, the
teacher-researcher’s reflective notes were analyzed inductively. Some knower legitimation was
adopted, but incomprehensibility, illogicality, superficial compliance to the scaffolding templates,
and resilience of knowledge legitimation dominated. Limited knowledge of science content and
practical procedures retarded outcome attainment. A qualifying pre-competition with a
knowledge focus, followed by interventions to convert these according to a relatively elite focus,
is argued for. The study explicates crucial but generally hidden aspects of inquiry.
REFERENCES (45)
1.
Alant, B. P. (2010). “We cross night”: Some reflections on the role of the ESKOM Expo for Young Scientists as a means of accommodating disadvantaged learners into the field of science and technology. Perspectives in Education, 28(4), 1-10.
https://www.ajol.info/index.ph....
2.
Bayat, A., Louw, W., & Rena, R. (2014). The impact of socio-economic factors on the performance of selected high school learners in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Journal of Human Ecology, 45(3), 183-196.
https://doi.org/10.1080/097092....
3.
Bowen, G. M., & Stelmach, B. (2020). Parental helping with science fair projects: A case study. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20, 342-354.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330....
4.
Bray, T. M. (2021). Shadow education in Africa: Private supplementary tutoring and its policy implications. Comparative Education Research Center, The University of Hong Kong.
https://doi.org/10.4324/978100....
5.
Delisi, J., Kook, J. F., Fields, E., Winfield, L., & Levy, A. J. (2020). An examination of the features of science fairs that support students‘ understandings of science and engineering practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(4), 491-519.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21....
6.
Emden, M. (2021). Reintroducing “the” scientific method to introduce scientific inquiry in schools? A cautioning plea not to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Science & Education, 30(5), 1037-1073.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
7.
Gaigher, E., Hattingh, A., Lederman, J., & Lederman, N. (2022). Understandings about scientific inquiry in a South African school prioritizing STEM. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 26(1), 13-23.
https://doi.org/10.1080/181172....
8.
Guthrie, G. (2021). Foundations of classroom change in developing countries. In Classroom change in developing countries (Vol. 2, Issue February). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/978135....
9.
Ioannidou, O., & Erduran, S. (2021). Beyond hypothesis testing: Investigating the diversity of scientific methods in science teachers’ understanding. Science and Education, 30(2), 345-364.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
10.
Kibirige, I., Teffo, W. L., & Singh, S. (2022). Investigating teachers’ perceptions of facilitating scientific investigations. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(2), Article em2074.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
11.
Kind, P., & Osborne, J. (2017). Styles of scientific reasoning: A cultural rationale for science education? Science Education, 101(1), 8-31.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21....
13.
Lesiak, J., & Bradley-Johnson, S. (1983). Reading assessment for placement and programming. Charles C Thomas.
16.
Maton, K., & Chen, R. T.-H. (2019). Specialization codes: Knowledge, knowers and student success. In J. R. Martin, K. Maton, & Y. J. Doran (Eds.), Accessing academic discourse (pp. 35-58). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/978042....
17.
Mupezeni, S., & Kriek, J. (2018). Out-of-school activity: A comparison of the experiences of rural and urban participants in science fairs in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(8), Article em1577.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
18.
Mupira, P., & Ramnarain, U. D. (2018). The effect of inquiry-based learning on the achievement goal-orientation of grade 10 physical sciences learners at township schools in South Africa. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(6), 810-825.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21....
19.
Naidoo, K. (2021). Understanding self-regulated learning and self-efficacy in project-based activities: Case studies of selected Eskom Expo for Young Scientists alumni. In J. Butler-Adam (Ed.), STEMI Olympiads and Competitions Community of Practice Conference (pp. 65-87). South African Agency for Science and Technology Advancement.
http://www.saasta.ac.za/saasta....
20.
Ngcoza, K. M., Sewry, J., Chikunda, C., & Kahenge, W. (2016). Stakeholders’ perceptions of participation in science expos: A South African case study. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), 189-199.
https://doi.org/10.1080/181172....
21.
Okitowamba, O., Julie, C., & Mbekwa, M. (2018). The effects of examination-driven teaching on mathematics achievement in grade 10 school-based high-stakes examinations. Pythagoras, 39(1).
https://doi.org/10.4102/pythag....
22.
Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177-196.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972....
23.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edur....
24.
Penn, M., & Ramnarain, U. D. (2022). South African grade 12 science students’ understandings of scientific inquiry. Science & Education, 31(3), 635-656.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
25.
Ramnarain, U. D. (2020). Exploring the autonomy of South African school science students when doing investigative inquiries for a science fair. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), Article em1911.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
26.
Ramnarain, U. D., & Hlatswayo, M. (2018). Teacher beliefs and attitudes about inquiry-based learning in a rural school district in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 38(1), 51-61.
https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.....
27.
Ramnarain, U. D., & Hobden, P. (2015). Shifting South African learners towards greater autonomy in scientific investigations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(1), 94-121.
https://doi.org/10.1080/002202....
28.
Ramnarain, U. D., & Schuster, D. (2014). The pedagogical orientations of South African physical sciences teachers towards inquiry or direct instructional approaches. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 627-650.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
29.
Reddy, V., Visser, M., Winnaar, L., Arends, F., Juan, A. L., Prinsloo, C., & Isdale, K. (2016). TIMSS 2015: Highlights of mathematics and science achievement of grade 9 South African learners. Human Sciences Research Council.
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.1....
30.
Schmidt, K. M., & Kelter, P. (2017). Science fairs: A qualitative study of their impact on student science inquiry learning and attitudes toward STEM. Science Educator, 25(2), 126-132.
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1132....
31.
Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214-240.
https://doi.org/10.1080/027027....
32.
Spaull, N. (2013). Poverty & privilege: Primary school inequality in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(5), 436-447.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijed....
34.
Spaull, N., & Pretorius, E. (2019). Still falling at the first hurdle: Examining early grade reading in South Africa. In N. Spaull, & J. Jansen (Eds.), South African schooling: The enigma of inequality (pp. 147-168). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
35.
Spaull, N., Pretorius, E., & Nompumelelo, M. (2020). Investigating the comprehension iceberg: Developing empirical benchmarks for early-grade reading in agglutinating African languages. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 10(1).
https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.....
36.
Stott, A. E. (2017). The effectiveness of a conceptually focused out-of-class intervention on promoting learning of electricity by township learners. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), 304-315.
https://doi.org/10.1080/181172....
37.
Stott, A. E. (2018). Are instructivist pedagogies more appropriate for learning the sciences in South African low-quintile schools than western literature suggests? Journal of Education, 71, 39-57.
38.
Stott, A. E. (2019). The efficacy of an extracurricular inquiry programme on grade 8 and 9 South African low quintile learners’ science learning. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 23(2), 157-168.
https://doi.org/10.1080/181172....
39.
Stott, A. E., & Beelders, T. (2019). The influence of science reading comprehension on South African township learners’ learning of science. South African Journal of Science, 115(1-2), 72-80.
https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.....
40.
Stott, A. E., Dreyer, H., & Venter, P. (2015). Consequences of the progression law in the FET phase: a case study. Journal of Education, 63, 89-109.
http://joe.ukzn.ac.za/Librarie....
41.
Stott, A. E., & Duvenhage, M. (2023). The response of higher-achieving South African learners from poverty to an extracurricular mathematics-guided problem-based learning programme. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1080/181172....
42.
Taylor, D. (2011). ‘They are using laptops, we are using boxes’: Township learners’ conceptions of Expo. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(1), 67-79.
https://doi.org/10.1080/102884....
44.
Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101-118.
https://doi.org/10.1080/002202....
45.
Zacharia, Z. C., Manoli, C., Xenofontos, N., de Jong, T., Pedaste, M., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: A literature review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(2), 257-302.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423....