This study investigated the cognitive and social processes through which high school students
acquire the differential concepts through communication in a dynamic geometry environment
through some cases. Additionally, we observed how a dynamic geometry environment affects
these processes. To achieve this objective, eight students were recruited by using the pre-test
results and divided into an experimental group and a control group. The learning environment
for the two groups was designed to be the same except for jointly manipulating Geogebra on the
laptop in the experimental group. Students’ discourse was analyzed using an analysis framework
that applied both Piaget’s (1959) linguistic categories and Rutherford’s (2011) neo-Piagetian
model. We found that the dynamic geometry environment improved communication among
students and their achievement levels. In particular, graphic and dynamic representations created
by dragging stimulated students’ interest and increased communication among them. Although
the quality of communication was somewhat different in the discourse analysis of the two groups,
each participant’s role was confirmed in the co-construction of knowledge among all cases of
eight students. We expect that precise verbal information on various representations of
mathematical content in the process of understanding the concepts of students could be an
opportunity to prepare educational environments corresponding thereto.
REFERENCES(27)
1.
Bormanaki, H. B., & Khoshhal, Y. (2017). The role of equilibration in Piaget’s theory of cognitive development and its implication for receptive skills: A theoretical study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(5), 996-1005. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr. 0805.22.
Gucler, B. (2013). Examining the discourse on the limit concept in a beginning-level calculus classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 439-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
Hollebrands, K. (2003). High school students’ understandings of geometry transformations in the context of a technological environment. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-....
Hwang, H. J., & Kim, M. H. (2016). An experimental study on the understanding of the differential concept based on the historical-genetic process using a technological device. School Mathematics, 18(2), 277-300.
Kang, H. I. (2012). Students’ reinvention of derivative concept through construction of tangent lines in the context of mathematical modeling. School Mathematics, 14(4), 409-429.
Kim, D. J., Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Sfard, A. (2012). How does language impact the learning of mathematics? Comparison of English and Korean speaking university students’ discourses on infinity. International Journal of Educational Research, 51-52(0), 86-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer....
Lee, S. G., Shin, J. K., & Kim, K. W. (2014). A case study of perceptions on storytelling mathematics textbooks with computer algebra system. Communications of Mathematical Education, 28(1), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee....
Lewis, K. E. (2017). Designing a bridging discourse: Re-mediation of a mathematical learning disability. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(2), 320-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/105084....
Mariotti, M. (2000). Introduction to proof: The mediation of a dynamic software environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1-2), 25-53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012....
Oh, H. Y. (2018). A study on understanding of differentiation. Communications of Mathematical Education, 19(4), 639-661. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee....
Park, E. J. (2017). Analysis of understanding of tangent and differential coefficients of high school students [Master’ thesis, Chonnam National University].
Robert, A., & Speer, N. (2001). Research on the teaching and learning of calculus/elementary analysis. In D. Holton (ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (pp. 283-299). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-....
Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 567-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/105084....
Sierpinska, A. (1987). Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18(4), 371-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0024....
Sinclair, N., & Moss, J. (2012). The more it changes, the more it becomes the same: The development of the routine of shape identification in dynamic geometry environment. International Journal of Educational Research, 51–52, 28-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer....
Sinclair, N., & Yurita, V. (2008). To be or to become: How dynamic geometry changes discourse. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(2), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/147948....
Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limit and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0030....
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.