RESEARCH PAPER
Distant science practicals–COVID-19 experience from Czech lower secondary schools
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC
 
 
Publication date: 2023-01-06
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2023;19(1):em2212
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study contributes to description of teaching changes resulting from COVID-19 epidemic. It focuses on online teaching of practical exercises in science subjects from pupils’ and teachers’ perspectives. Views on the distance learning of practical exercises were obtained from Czech lower-secondary school pupils (n=543) and science teachers (n=24). Most teachers conducted science practicum classes using a combination of synchronous and asynchronous methods and rated support from school management as rather adequate. Teachers assigned fewer hands-on activities, specifically experiments, observations, and activities resulting in a product, in distance teaching than in face-to-face lessons, although they rated them as the most useful. Pupils found experimentation and observation to be the most interesting and useful, followed by activities that result in a product (e.g., herbarium). Pupils generally preferred the present form of practical activities.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
2.
Akyildiz, S. T. (2020). College students’ views on the pandemic distance education: A focus group discussion. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes....
 
3.
Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389....
 
4.
Amin, F. M., & Sundari, H. (2020). EFL students’ preferences on digital platforms during emergency remote teaching: Video conference, LMS, or Messenger application? Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele....
 
5.
Balderas-Solís, J., Roque-Hernández, R. V., Salazar-Hernández, R., & López-Mendoza, A. (2021). Experiences of undergraduates’ emergency remote education in Mexico. Cogent Education, 8(1), 2000846. https://doi.org/10.1080/233118....
 
6.
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465....
 
7.
Cash, K. J. (2021). Malting in the lab and at home: The forgotten step on the path to beer. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(4), 1410-1414. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
 
8.
Cavanaugh, C., Gillan, K. J., Kromrey, J., Hess, M., & Blomeyer, R. (2004). The effects of distance education on K-12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Learning Point Associates/North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. https://files.eric.ed.gov/full....
 
9.
Chiu, J. L., DeJaegher, C. J., & Chao, J. (2015). The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students’ understanding of gas properties. Computers & Education, 85, 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
10.
Cybulski, J. S., Clements, J., & Prakash, M. (2014). Foldscope: Origami-based paper microscope. PLOS ONE, 9(6), e98781. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
 
11.
Dolenc, K., Šorgo, A., & Ploj-Virtic, M. (2022). Perspectives on lessons from the COVID-19 outbreak for post-pandemic higher education: Continuance intention model of forced online distance teaching. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-je....
 
12.
Duffek, V., Kohout, J., Kuberská, M., Masopust, P., Motlíková, I., Slavík, J., & Stacke, V. (2020). K jádru učitelské práce: O didaktickém přístupu učitel\uu k učebním úlohám v době koronakrize (průzkum mezi plzeňskými učiteli) [On the core of teachers’ work: On the didactic approach to teaching tasks in the era of corona crisis (survey among pilsen teachers)]. Pedagogická Orientace [Pedagogical Orientation], 30(2), 184-191. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2....
 
13.
Flores, D. P., & Marzullo, T. C. (2021). The construction of high-magnification homemade lenses for a simple microscope: An easy “DIY” tool for biological and interdisciplinary education. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.....
 
14.
Gungor, A., Kool, D., Lee, M., Avraamidou, L., Eisink, N., Albada, B., van der Kolk, K., Tromp, M., & Bitter, J. H. (2022). The use of virtual reality in a chemistry lab and its impact on students’ self-efficacy, interest, self-concept and laboratory anxiety. EURASIA Journal Of Mathematics Science And Technology Education, 18(3), em2090. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
15.
Havlíčková, V., Šorgo, A., & Bílek, M. (2018). Can virtual dissection replace traditional hands-on dissection in school biology laboratory work? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1415-1429. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
16.
He, L., Yang, N., Xu, L., Ping, F., Li, W., Sun, Q., Li, Y., Zhu, H., & Zhang, H. (2021). Synchronous distance education vs traditional education for health science students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education, 55(3), 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.1....
 
17.
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534-2553. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
18.
Jaakkola, T., Nurmi, S., & Veermans, K. (2011). A comparison of students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation-laboratory contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20....
 
19.
Kelley, E. W. (2021a). LAB theory, HLAB pedagogy, and review of laboratory learning in chemistry during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(8), 2496-2517. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
 
20.
Kelley, E. W. (2021b). Sample plan for easy, inexpensive, safe, and relevant hands-on, at-home wet organic chemistry laboratory activities. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(5), 1622-1635. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
 
21.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430....
 
22.
Lalley, J. P., Piotrowski, P. S., Battaglia, B., Brophy, K., & Chugh, K. (2010). A comparison of V-frog [C] to physical frog dissection. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(2), 189-200.
 
23.
Lee, K., Fanguy, M., Lu, X. S., & Bligh, B. (2021). Student learning during COVID-19: It was not as bad as we feared. Distance Education, 42(1), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/015879....
 
24.
Marincean, S., & Scribner, S. L. (2020). Remote organic chemistry laboratories at University of Michigan–Dearborn. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3074-3078. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
 
25.
Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course ‘forced’ online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 609-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/026074....
 
26.
Parent, N., Dadgar, K., Xiao, B., Hesse, C., & Shapka, J. D. (2021). Social disconnection during COVID-19: The role of attachment, fear of missing out, and smartphone use. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(3), 748-763. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.1....
 
27.
Pavlas, T., Andrys, O., Pražáková, D., & Šlajchová, L. (2020). Zkušenosti žáků a učitelů základních škol s distanční výukou ve 2. pololetí školního roku 2019/2020 [Experience of primary school pupils and teachers with distance learning in the 2nd half of the school year 2019/2020]. Česká školní inspekce [Czech school inspection].
 
28.
Pavlas, T., Zatloukal, T., Andrys, O., & Neumajer, O. (2021). Distanční vzdělávání v základních a středních školách. Přístupy, posuny a zkušenosti škol rok od nástupu pandemie nemoci COVID-19 [Distance education in primary and secondary schools. Approaches, shifts and school experiences one year since the onset of the COVID-19 disease pandemic]. Česká školní inspekce [Czech school inspection].
 
29.
Ploj Virtič, M., Dolenc, K., & Šorgo, A. (2021). Changes in online distance learning behavior of university students during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak, and development of the model of forced distance online learning preferences. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 393-411. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-je....
 
30.
Poluhová, A. (2020). Analýza distančního vzdělávání během nouzového stavu na 2. stupni vybrané ZŠ [Analysis of distance education during the state of emergency at the 2nd stage of a selected primary school] [Master’s thesis, Charles University].
 
31.
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438....
 
32.
Rokos, L., & Vančura, M. (2020). Distanční výuka při opatřeních spojených s koronavirovou pandemií–pohled očima učitelů, žáků a jejich rodičů [Distance learning during measures related to the coronavirus pandemic–a view through the eyes of teachers, pupils and their parents]. Pedagogická Orientace [Pedagogical Orientation], 30(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2....
 
33.
Rupnik, M. (2021). Mnenje učencev o učenju na daljavo pri pouku gospodinjstva v času epidemije COVID-19 [Students’ perceptions of distance learning in home economics during the COVID-19 epidemic] [Master’s thesis, University of Ljubljana].
 
34.
Salta, K., Ntalakou, E., & Tsiortos, Z. (2022). Review of hands-on laboratory experiments employing household supplies. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(7), 2563-2571. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
 
35.
Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322(5902), 682-683. https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top