RESEARCH PAPER
Does Blended Learning Improve the Academic Achievement of Undergraduate Students in the Mathematics Course?: A Case Study in Higher Education
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
College of Humanities and Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
 
2
Nonlinear Dynamics Research Center (NDRC), Ajman University, Ajman, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
 
 
Publication date: 2021-03-18
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2021;17(4):em1951
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The study aimed to identify the impact of utilizing blended learning in teaching mathematics (MTH121) course on the achievement of undergraduate learners at Ajman University. The researchers followed the quasi-experimental approach. The sample of the study consisted of (196) males and females split into two control and empiric groups. The empirical group was taught using the blended learning method and the number of its students reached (99), while the other group is the control group studied in the usual conventional method, and its students reached (97) students. The study used an achievement exam in addition. The study found that there were significantly important variations in the achievement exam among the empiric and control groups for the benefit of the empirical group.
REFERENCES (71)
1.
Abouchedid, K. & Eid, G. M. (2004). E-learning challenges in the Arab world: revelations from case study profile. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/096848....
 
2.
Adiguzel, T., Kamit, T., & Ertas, B. (2020). Teaching and Learning Experiences with Enhanced Books in Engineering Math and Science Courses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 11(2), 143-158. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.6....
 
3.
Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 440-454. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.....
 
4.
Al-Madani, F. (2015). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement in Arabic language and the development of their creative thinking. Asian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 5(2), 30-37. http://www.tspmt.com/july2015_....
 
5.
Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 5261-5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639....
 
6.
Al-Qatawneh, S., Eltahir, M., & Alsalhi, N. (2020). The effect of blended learning on the achievement of HDE students in the methods of teaching Arabic language course and their attitudes towards its use at Ajman University: A case study. Education and Information Technologies. 3(1), 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639....
 
7.
Alsalhi, N., Eltahir, M., & Al-Qatawneh, S. (2019). The effect of blended learning on the achievement of ninth grade students in science and their attitudes towards its use. Heliyon, 5(9), e02424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli....
 
8.
Alzahrani, M. G., & O’Toole, J. M. (2017). The impact of internet experience and attitude on student preference for blended learning. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 6(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v6....
 
9.
Ameloot, E., & Schellens, T. (2018). Student teachers’ perceptions of using learning analytics in a blended learning context. Proceedings of INTED2018 Conference, Valencia, Spain. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted....
 
10.
Awodeyi, A. F., Akpan, E. T., & Udo, I. J. (2014). Enhancing teaching and learning of mathematics: Adoption of blended learning pedagogy in University of Uyo. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(11), 40-45. https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v....
 
11.
Ayse, K. O. K. (2008). An online social constructivist tool: A secondary school experience in the developing world. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(7), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE....
 
12.
Bervell, B., Nyagorme, P., & Arkorful, V. (2020). LMS-Enabled Blended Learning Use Intentions among Distance Education Tutors: Examining the Mediation Role of Attitude Based on Technology-Related Stimulus-Response Theoretical Framework. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep273. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedte....
 
13.
Birlik, S. (2015). Taxonomy of the cognitive domain: An example of architectural education program. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(4), 3272-3277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsp....
 
14.
Brady, A. (2005). Assessment of learning with multiple-choice questions. Nurse Education in Practice, 5(4), 238-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr....
 
15.
Bunatovich, U., & Khidayevich, D. (2020). The importance of modern innovative teaching methods in the higher education system of Uzbekistan. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 1064-1067. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.0....
 
16.
Ceylan, V., & A. E. Kesici. (2017). Effect of blended learning to academic achievement. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(1), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v....
 
17.
Crawford, R., & Jenkins, L. (2017). Blended learning and team teaching: Adapting pedagogy in response to the changing digital tertiary environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.....
 
18.
David, M. (2016). Situational leadership theory as a foundation for a blended learning framework. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(1), 25-30. https://files.eric.ed.gov/full....
 
19.
Davis, M. H. (2003). Outcome based education. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 30(3), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.3....
 
20.
Devlin, M. & Samarawickrema, G. (2010). The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/072943....
 
21.
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239....
 
22.
Elfaki, N., Abdulraheem, I., & Abdulrahim, R. (2019). Impact of e-learning vs traditional learning on student’s performance and attitude. International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences, 8(10), 76-82. https://www.semanticscholar.or....
 
23.
ElSayary, A. (2021). Using a Reflective Practice Model to Teach STEM Education in a Blended Learning Environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(2), em1942. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
24.
Epstein, R. M. (2007). Assessment in medical education. New England Journal of Medicine, 356(4), 387-396. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra....
 
25.
Eryilmaz, M. (2015). The Effectiveness of blended learning environments. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 8(4), 251-256. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.....
 
26.
Fazal, M., & Bryant, M. (2019). Blended learning in middle school math: The question of effectiveness. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(1), 49-64. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1208....
 
27.
Fitzsimons, M. (2014). Engaging students’ learning through active learning. Irish Journal of Academic Practice, 3(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7842....
 
28.
Francis, R. & Shannon, S. J. (2013). Engaging with blended learning to improve students’ learning outcomes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(4), 359-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/030437....
 
29.
Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333-350). Routledge.
 
30.
Hinampas, R., Murillo, C., Tan, D., & Layosa, R. (2018). Blended learning approach: Effect on students’ academic achievement and practical skills in science laboratories. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 7(11), 63-69. https://www.researchgate.net/p....
 
31.
Huang, H. (2002). Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8....
 
32.
Kazu, I., & Demirkol, M., (2014). Effect of blended learning environment on high school students’ academic achievement. Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol, 13(1), 78-87. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1018....
 
33.
Kemp, L. (2013). Introducing blended learning: An experience of uncertainty for students in the United Arab Emirates. Research in Learning Technology, 21(1), Article 18461. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v2....
 
34.
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(7), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239....
 
35.
Klimova, B. (2017, September). Evaluation of the blended learning approach in the course of business English: A case study. In International Symposium on Emerging Technologies for Education (pp. 326-335). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
36.
Kwak, D., Menezes, F., & Sherwood, C. (2015). Assessing the impact of blended learning on student performance. Economic Record, 19(292), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4....
 
37.
Lin, Y., Tseng, C., & Chiang, P. (2017). The effect of blended learning in mathematics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 741-770. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
38.
Malik, R. (2018). Educational challenges in 21st century and sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 2(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsder....
 
39.
Manguire, K. (2005). Professional development in blended e-learning environment for middle school mathematics teachers (M.A. dissertation). University of Toronto, Canada.
 
40.
Marina, D., & Tatjana, G. (2020). Teachersʼ assessment of active learning in teaching Nature and Society. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 1265-1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/133167....
 
41.
Meyer, M., & Norman, D. (2020). Changing design education for the 21st century. The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shej....
 
42.
Mondal, G., Majumder, P., & Mandal, M. (2019). Effect of blended learning strategy for secondary school science students. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 6(1), 381-387. http://ijrar.com/upload_issue/....
 
43.
Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. 2012. Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education, 18(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihed....
 
44.
Mula, J. (2015). Effects of e-blended instruction on grade 10 students’ performance and attitude towards geometry (M.A. dissertation). Trece Martires City National High School.
 
45.
Oweis, T. (2018). Effects of using a blended learning method on students’ achievement and motivation to learn English in Jordan: A pilot case study. Education Research International, 2018(91), Article 7425924. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7....
 
46.
Pechenkina, E., Scardamaglia, A., & Gregory, J. (2018). “It’s the Combination That Works”: Evaluating Student Experiences with a Multi-element Blended Design in First-year Law. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(4), 405-422. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.4....
 
47.
Power, M. (2008). The emergence of a blended online learning environment. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 503-5014. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol4no....
 
48.
Rahman, M. M., Singh, M. K. M., & Pandian, A. (2018). Exploring ESL teacher beliefs and classroom practices of CLT: A case study. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2....
 
49.
Rocher, A. (2018). Active learning strategies and academic self-efficacy relate to both attentional control and attitudes towards plagiarism. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/146978....
 
50.
Rooney, J. E. (2003). Blending learning opportunities to enhance educational programming and meetings. Association Management, 55(5), 26-32. https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dy....
 
51.
Sahni, J. (2019). Does blended learning enhance student engagement? Evidence from higher education. Journal of e-Learning and Higher Education, 2019(2019), Article 121518. https://doi.org/10.5171/2019.1....
 
52.
Sarıtepeci, M. & Çakır, H. (2015). The effect of blended learning environments on students’ academic achievement and student engagement: A study on social studies course. Education and Science, 40(177), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.20....
 
53.
Seage, S. J., & Türegün, M. (2020). The effects of blended learning on STEM achievement of elementary school students. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 6(1), 133-140. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres....
 
54.
Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
55.
Shaaruddin, J., & Mohamad, M. (2017). Identifying the effectiveness of active learning strategies and benefits in curriculum and pedagogy course for undergraduate TESL students. Creative Education, 8(14), 2312-2324. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.201....
 
56.
Shang, F., & Liu, C.-Y. (2018). Blended learning in medical physiology improves nursing students’ study efficiency. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(4), 711-717. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.....
 
57.
Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239....
 
58.
Snoussi, T. (2019). ICT faculties’ usage in the UAE private universities: A case study. Global Media Journal, 17(33), 1-8. https://www.globalmediajournal....
 
59.
Stuchlikova, L. (2016). Challenges of education in the 21st century. International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), Vysoke, 335-340. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA.....
 
60.
Tongchai, N. (2016). Impact of self-regulation and open learner model on learning achievement in blended learning environment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(5), 343-347. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET. 2016.V6.711.
 
61.
Trapp, S. (2006). Blended learning concepts: A short overview. EC- TEL Workshops Proceedings, ISSN 1613-0073, 28-35. http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aac....
 
62.
United Nations. (2019). The future is now: Science for achieving sustainable development. Global sustainable development report. New York: United Nations.
 
63.
Ustun, A., & Tracey, M. (2020). An effective way of designing blended learning: A three phase design-based research approach. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 1529-1552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639....
 
64.
Valerie, J. (2005). The effectiveness of blended Learning for the employees (Unpublished dissertation). Fiflding Graduate University.
 
65.
Velle, L. (2020). The challenges for teacher education in the 21st century: Urgency, complexity and timeliness. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/026074....
 
66.
Vrazalic, L., MacGregor, R., Behl, D., & Fitzgerald, J. (2009). E-learning barriers in the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary results from an experimental investigation. IBIMA Business Review, 4(1), Article 458727. https://doi.org/10.5171/2010.4....
 
67.
Wang, M. J. (2010). Online collaboration and offline interaction between students using asynchronous tools in blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 830-846. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.....
 
68.
Wright, B. M. (2017). Blended learning: Student perception of face-to-face and online EFL lessons. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 64- 71. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.....
 
69.
Yeou, M. (2016). An investigation of students’ acceptance of Moodle in a blended learning setting using technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 44(3), 300-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/004723....
 
70.
Yılmaz, M. B., & Orhan, F. (2010). Pre-service English teachers in blended learning environment in respect to their learning approaches. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 9(1), 157-158. https://files.eric.ed.gov/full....
 
71.
Yusoff, S, Yusoff, R., & Md Noh, N. (2017). Blended Learning Approach for Less Proficient Students. SAGE Open, 7(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/215824....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top