SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER
Effect of Learning Organization on Organizational Communication and Organizational Creativity in High-Tech Industry
More details
Hide details
1
School of Accountancy, Fujian Jiangxia University, Fuzhou, Fujian, CHINA
2
Finance and Accounting Research Center, Fujian Jiangxia University, Fujian Province Philosophy Social Science Research Base, CHINA
Online publication date: 2017-11-16
Publication date: 2017-11-16
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(12):7723-7730
This article belongs to the special issue "Problems of Application Analysis in Knowledge Management and Science-Mathematics-Education".
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In face of the rapidly changing economic environment, the competitive advantages on which high-Tech Industry used to depend for the development are disappearing. The value of high-Tech Industry no longer depends on the possession of plants, equipment, and products, but on the intellectual property, customer confidence, and teamwork ability of business partners, infrastructure of telecommunications, and employees’ creative potential and skills. How to construct the environment climate, in high-Tech Industry, for employees being happy to work, creating knowledge, learning, communicating and sharing as well as to guide employees’ goals being consistent with organizational objectives to continuously contribute to the organization is the motivation of this study. Aiming at supervisors and employees of manufacturers in Weihai Torch Hi-Tech Science Park in Shandong Province, total 500 copies of questionnaire are distributed in this study. 376 valid copies are retrieved, with the retrieval rate 75%. The research results conclude that 1.learning organization presents positive and significant effects on organizational communication, 2.organizational communication reveals positive and remarkable effects on organizational creativity, and 3.learning organization shows positive effects on organizational creativity. According to the results, conclusion and suggestion are proposed, expecting to help high-Tech Industry become learning organizations and promote organizational communication and organizational creativity.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Agarwal, P. D., Kiran, R., & Verma, A. K. (2012). Knowledge sharing for stimulating learning environment in institutions of higher technical education. African Journal of Business Management, 6(16), 533-542.
2.
Al-Busaidi, K. A. (2013). A framework of critical factors to knowledge workers’’ adoption of inter-organizational knowledge sharing systems. IBIMA Publishing LLC., United States: Norristown. Journal of Organizational Knowledge Management, (2013), 1-11.
3.
Aslam, M., Haris, S., Khuram, S., Aly, R., & Ramish, A. (2014). Social capital and knowledge sharing as determinants of academic performance institute of behavioral and applied management. United States: Glendale. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 15, 25-41.
4.
Atalay, E., Hortacsu, A., & Syverson, C. (2012). Why do firms own production chains? Department of Economics, University of Chicago and University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago, IL.
5.
Black, S. (2013). Fictions of humanitarian responsibility: Narrating microfinance. Australian National University. Journal of human rights, 12, 103-120.
6.
Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Eckstein, D. (2014). The impact of knowledge transferand complexity on supply chain flexibility: A knowledge-based view. Elsevier Sequoia S.A., Amsterdam: Switzerland. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 307-325.
7.
Boden, A., Avram, G., Bannon, L., & Wulf, V. (2012). Knowledge sharing practices and the impact of cultural factors: Reflections on two case studies of offshoring in SME. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 24(2), 139-152.
8.
Chen, C. W., Chang, M. L., & Tseng, C. P. (2012). Human factors of knowledge‐sharing intention among Taiwanese enterprises: A model of hypotheses. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing and Service Industries, 22(4), 328-339.
9.
Chen, W. J., & Cheng, H. Y. (2012). Factors affecting the knowledge sharing attitude of hotel service Personnel. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(2), 468-476.
10.
Cheng, J. H., & Fu, Y. C. (2013). Inter-organizational relationships and knowledge sharing through the relationship and institutional orientations in supply chains. Elsevier Science Ltd., Killington: United Kingdom. International Journal of Information Management, 33, 473-489.
11.
Cheung, C. K., Lee, M. K., & Lee, Z. W. (2013). Understanding the continuance intention of knowledge sharing in online communities of practice through the post-knowledge-sharing evaluation processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7).
12.
Chung, H. L., Rosea, E., & Huang, P. (2012). Linking international adaptation strategy, immigrant effect, and performance: The case of home-host and cross-market scenario. International Business Review, 21(1), 40-58.
13.
Elenurm, T. (2012). Open space as a knowledge metaphor and a knowledge sharing intervention. Basingstoke: United Kingdom. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 10, 55-63.
14.
Ganjinia, H. S., Mohammad, S. B., & Ghasabsaraei, M. Y. (2014). Knowledge management role in motivating employees through supervisory control and perceived organizational support and its impact on knowledge sharing in red crescent society of guilanprovice. Sohar University, Oman and American University of Kuwait, Kuwait City, India, Business and Economics Management, Kuwait Chapter of the Arabian. Journal of Business and Management Review, 3, 325-333.
15.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis. Delhi: Pearson Education Inc.
16.
Jarrahi, M. H., & Sawyer, S. (2013). Social technologies, informal knowledge practices, and the enterprise. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 23(1-2), 110.
17.
Keller, W., & Yeaple, S. R. (2012). The gravity of knowledge. American Economic Review, 103(4), 1414-1444.
18.
Khosravi, A., & Ahmad, M. N. (2013). Knowledge sharing impact factors selection for research supervision. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3(6), 148-161.
19.
Klitmoller, A., & Lauring, J. (2013). When global virtual teams share knowledge: Media richness, cultural difference and language commonality. Journal of World Business, 48, 398-403.
20.
Lars, P. H., & Thomas, J. S. (2012). Three types of ambiguity. University of Chicago and NBER, New York University and the Hoover Institution and Three Types of Ambiguity. Journal of Monetary Economics, 322-340.
21.
Lee, T. (2012). Getting to know you: Using documentary video-making to challenge ageist stereotypes. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 33, 272-286.
22.
Lin, T. C., Wu, S., & Lu, C. T. (2012). Exploring the affect factors of knowledge sharing behavior: The relations model theory perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 751-764.
23.
Liu, Y. C., & Li, F. C. (2012). Exploration of social capital and knowledge sharing: An empirical study on student virtual teams. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 10(2), 17-22.
24.
Martin, J., & Beckmann, M. (2013). Knowledge creation and knowledge diffusion in space and regional innovation performance: Introductory remarks. Annals of Regional Science, 51(1), 113-118.
25.
Nagati, H., & Rebolledo, C. (2014). Improving operational performance through knowledge exchange with customers. Production Planning and Control, 24, 658-672.
26.
Nazar, M. R. (2013). Knowledge sharing intention through the social media using theory of planned behavior approach. Social Science Research Network, Social Sciences: Comprehensive Works.
27.
Pinjani, P., & Prashant, P. (2013). Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Information and Management, 50(4), 144-152.
28.
Yazici, H. J. (2012). Buyer-Supplier knowledge sharing in a service supply chain. IIE Annual Conference, Proceedings. Scholarly Journals, 2012(6), 1-6.
29.
Zukowski, L., Angela, A., & Min, M. H. (2012). The next step into the future. Future, 43, 80-82.
30.
Zundert, J. V. (2012). If you build it, will we come? Large scale digital infrastructures asa dead end for digital humanities. Future, 37, 165-186.