RESEARCH PAPER
Effect of scaffolding strategies and guided discovery on higher-order thinking skills in physics education
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, MALAYSIA
 
2
Riyadh Technical College, Technical and Vocational Training Corporation, Riyadh, SAUDI ARABIA
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-08-19
 
 
Publication date: 2024-09-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(9):em2496
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Embedding higher-order thinking within science education, particularly in teaching physics, can equip students to learn physics at a deeper level and to become active learners who can analyze and solve problems independently. The present research aimed to assess the effectiveness of scaffolding strategies along with a guided discovery approach on students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) at technical colleges in Saudi Arabia. The study employed a quasi-experimental design to involve 104 students enrolled in the physics 101 course in two groups: an experimental group (EG) (n = 54), which experienced scaffolding strategies and guided discovery approach during the instruction, and a control group (CG) (n = 54), which received the instruction through conventional teaching methods. All participants took a pre- and post-test consisting of a HOTS test. Data analysis using inferential statistics revealed significant differences in the test scores between CG and EG. The results indicated that students in the EG performed better on the HOTS test in comparison to the students in the CG. Based on these results, it is concluded that the scaffolding strategies and guided discovery have a positive effect on students’ HOTS. The study’s findings have significant implications for enhancing science instruction, particularly teaching of physics in Saudi technical and vocational colleges.
REFERENCES (49)
1.
Ab Halim, A. S., Osman, K., Aziz, M. M., Ibrahim, M. F., & Ahmad, A. A. K. (2021). The competency of science teachers in integrating higher order thinking skills in teaching and learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1793, Article 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
 
2.
Akben, N. (2020). Effects of the problem-posing approach on students’ problem solving skills and metacognitive awareness in science education. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1143-1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
3.
Alrawili, K. S., Osman, K., & Almuntasheri, S. (2020). Effect of scaffolding strategies on higher-order thinking skills in science classroom. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(5), 718-729. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/....
 
4.
Alrawili, K. S., Osman, K., & Almuntasheri, S. S. (2021). Scaffolding strategies in promoting attitudes of Saudi middle school science students. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.30935/scima....
 
5.
Andreatta, P., & Dougherty, P. (2019). Supporting the development of psychomotor skills. In D. Nestel, K. Dalrymple, J. Paige, & R. Aggarwal (Eds.), Advancing surgical education: Innovation and change in professional education (pp. 183-196). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98....
 
6.
Asenahabi, B. M. (2019). Basics of research design: A guide to selecting appropriate research design. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches, 6(5), 76-89.
 
7.
Barak, M., & Shakhman, L. (2008). Fostering higher-order thinking in science class: Teachers’ reflections. Teachers and Teaching, 14(3), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406....
 
8.
Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans.
 
9.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.
 
10.
Ciardiello, A. V. (2000). Student questioning and multidimensional literacy in the 21st century. The Educational Forum, 64(3), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/001317....
 
11.
Cullinane, A. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy and its use in classroom assessment. Resource & Research Guides, 1(13), 2-3.
 
12.
De Jong, T. (2006). Scaffolds for scientific discovery learning. In J. Elen, & D. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Research & theory (pp. 107-128). Elsevier.
 
13.
Delgado-Rico, E., Carretero-Dios, H., & Ruch, W. (2012). Content validity evidences in test development: An applied perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology España, 12(3), 449-460.
 
14.
Doolittle, P. E. (1997). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development as a theoretical foundation for cooperative learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 8(1), 83-103.
 
15.
Fahmi, Setiadi, I., Elmawati, D., & Sunardi (2019). Discovery learning method for training critical thinking skills of students. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(3), 342-351. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo....
 
16.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.
 
17.
Hugerat, M., & Kortam, N. (2014). Improving higher order thinking skills among freshmen by teaching science through inquiry. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 447-454. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
18.
Jailani, J., Sugiman, S., & Apino, E. (2017). Implementing the problem-based learning in order to improve the students’ HOTS and characters. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.....
 
19.
Janssen, F. J., Westbroek, H. B., & van Driel, J. H. (2014). How to make guided discovery learning practical for student teachers. Instructional Science, 42, 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251....
 
20.
Khan, A., Egbue, O., Palkie, B. & Madden, J. (2017). Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 15(2), 107-115.
 
21.
Khasanah, N., Dwiastuti, S. & Nurmiyati. (2016). The influence of guided discovery learning model toward scientific literacy based on naturalist intelligence. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 13(1), 346-351. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18....
 
22.
Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/174549....
 
23.
Larkin, M. J. (2002). Using scaffolded instruction to optimize learning. ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education.
 
24.
Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/004058....
 
25.
Lord, T., & Baviskar, S. (2007). Moving students from information recitation to information understanding–Exploiting bloom’s taxonomy in creating science questions. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 40-44.
 
26.
Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37, 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
27.
Muhali, M., Prahani, B. K., Mubarok, H., Kurnia, N., & Asy’ari, M. (2021). The impact of guided-discovery-learning model on students’ conceptual understanding and critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 5(3), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.36312/esain....
 
28.
Ormrod, J. E., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2023). Educational psychology: Developing learners. Pearson.
 
29.
Padesky, C. A. (2022). Collaboration and guided discovery. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 29(3), 545-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpr....
 
30.
Reichardt, C. S. (2009). Quasi-experimental design. In R. E. Millsap, & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 490-500). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/978085....
 
31.
Rowe, J. A. (2004). From creative intelligence: Discovering the innovative potential in ourselves & others. Prentice Hall.
 
32.
Saido, G. M., Siraj, S., Nordin, A. B. B., & Al_Amedy, O. S. (2018). Higher order thinking skills among secondary school students in science learning. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3), 13-20.
 
33.
Sari, E. N. F. T., Amin, M., Hudha, A. M., Fatmawati, D., & Fauzi, A. (2021). Development of HOTS-based biology learning documents using ADDIE model. Research and Development in Education, 1(2), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden....
 
34.
Simpson, E. J. (1972). The classification of educational objectives: Psychomotor domain. UI Press.
 
35.
Sukatiman, Akhyar, M., Siswandari, & Roemintoyo. (2020). Enhancing higher-order thinking skills in vocational education through scaffolding-problem based learning. Open Engineering, 10(1), 612-619. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-20....
 
36.
Sulaiman, T., Muniyan, V., Madhvan, D., Hasan, R., & Rahim, S. S. A. (2017). Implementation of higher order thinking skills in teaching of science: A case study in Malaysia. International Research Journal of Education and Sciences, 1(1), 2550-2158.
 
37.
Summers, S. (1993). Establishing the reliability and validity of a new instrument: Pilot testing. Journal of Post Anesthesia Nursing, 8(2), 124-127.
 
38.
Sun, H., Xie, Y., & Lavonen, J. (2022). Exploring the structure of students’ scientific higher order thinking in science education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, Article 100999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.....
 
39.
Turner, V. D., & Berkowitz, M. W. (2005). Scaffolding morality: Positioning a socio-cultural construct. New Ideas in Psychology, 23(3), 174-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newi....
 
40.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648....
 
41.
Van Der Stuyf, R. R. (2002). Scaffolding as a teaching strategy. Adolescent Learning and Development, 52(3), 5-18.
 
42.
Villanueva, L. C. (1976). On the effectiveness of the discovery approach as a teaching method for population education. Population Center Foundation.
 
43.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
 
44.
Wartono, W., Alfroni, Y. F., Batlolona, J. R., & Mahapoonyanont, N. (2019). Inquiry-scaffolding learning model: Its effect on critical thinking skills and conceptual understanding. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 8(2), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfa....
 
45.
Wass, R., Harland, T., & Mercer, A. (2011). Scaffolding critical thinking in the zone of proximal development. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/072943....
 
46.
Widiawati, L., Joyoatmojo, S., & Sudiyanto, S. (2018). Higher order thinking skills as effect of problem based learning in the 21st century learning. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(3), 96-105.
 
47.
Zain, F. M., Sailin, S. N., & Mahmor, N. A. (2022). Promoting higher order thinking skills among pre-service teachers through group-based flipped learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 519-542. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2....
 
48.
Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145-181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327....
 
49.
Zoller, U. (1993). Are lecture and learning compatible? Maybe for LOCS: Unlikely for HOCS. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(3), 195-199. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed070p....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top