2/2019 vol. 15
Stats
CC-BY 4.0
Get citation
RESEARCH PAPER
Effects of Context-Based Instructional Approaches on Students’ Problem-Solving Skills in Rotational Motion
Fikadu Eshetu 1,2
,
 
Shimeles Assefa 3
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
PhD candidate, Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Addis Ababa University, ETHIOPIA
 
2
Lecturer, Jigjiga University, ETHIOPIA
 
3
Associate Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Addis Ababa University, ETHIOPIA
 
 
Publication date: 2018-12-21
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2019;15(2):em1665
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/102283
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (57)
 
KEYWORDS
context-based instructional approaches
traditional instruction
problem-solving skills
rotational motion
 
ABSTRACT
This study investigated the effect of context-based instructional approaches on students’ problem-solving skills using quasi-experimental design. A total of 166 eleventh grade students participated in the study. Data were collected using problem-solving skill test. A REACT (Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperating and Transferring) strategy of context-based instruction and traditional instruction integrated with the REACT strategy of context-based instruction were used to teach treatment group I and treatment group II students, respectively while the traditional method was used in the comparison group. The result shows the existence of mean differences between the groups in favor of the treatment groups. But this difference was not statistically significant. Therefore, the traditional problem-solving strategies did not have a significant impact on students’ problems solving skills although active learning strategies were used. Hence, we suggest the concomitant use of active learning method(s) and more recent problem-solving strategies. On the other hand, the gender gap was not that much significant in the treatment groups and hence, the approaches can work for both genders.
REFERENCES (57)
1.
Ambrose, B. S., Shafer, P. S., Steinberg, R. N., & McDermott, L. (1999). An investigation of student understanding of single-slit diffraction and double-slit diffraction. American Journal of Physics, 67(2), 146 – 155. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1921....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Armagan, F. Ö., Sagır, S. U., & Çelik, A. Y. (2009). The effects of students’ problem solving skills on their understanding of chemical rate and their achievement on this issue. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 2678–2684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsp....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Assefa, S. (2016). Impact of Conceptual Change Approach on Conceptual Knowledge, Procedural Knowledge and Knowledge Transfer. Staff and Educational Development International, 20(1), 15–37.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Bennett, J. (2003). Context-based approaches to the teaching of science. In: Teaching and Learning of Science (pp. 99-122). London, UK: Continuum.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Bowden, J., Dall’Alba, G., Martin, E., Laurillard, D., Marton, F., Master, G., Ramsden, P., Stephanau, A., & Walsh, E. (1992). Displacement, velocity, and Frames of reference: Phenonemographic studies of students’ understanding and some implications for teaching and assessment. American Journal of Physics, 60(3), 262 – 269. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1690....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Center for Occupational Research and Development (CORD). (1999). Teaching Science Contextually: The Cornerstone of Tech Prep. Waco, Texas: CORD Communications.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66 – 71. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1298....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Cohen J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970 – 977. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Demirci, N., Duman, İ., & Şekercioğlu, A. (2015). University Students’ Difficulties and Misconceptions on Rolling, Rotational Motion and Torque Concepts. International Journal on New Trends in Education and their Implications, 6(1), 46 – 54.Fraenkel, J.R & Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw Hill Inc.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Docktor, J. L., Dornfeld, J., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., Jackson, K. L., … Yang, J. (2016). Assessing student written problem solutions: A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12, 010130. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRe....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual problem-solving in high school physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11, 020106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRe....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Hardiman, P. T., & Mestre, J. P. (1992). Constraining Novices to Perform Expertlike Problem Analyses: Effects on Schema Acquisition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 307 -331.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Gerace, W. J., & Beatty, I. D. (2005). Teaching vs. Learning: Changing Perspectives on Problem-solving in Physics Instruction. An invited talk at the 9th Common Conference of the Cyprus Physics Association and Greek Physics Association: Developments and Perspectives in Physics - New Technologies and Teaching of Science. Nicosia, Cyprus, Feb 4-6, 2005.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-students survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1880....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Hardiman, P. T., Dufresne, R., J., & Mestre, J. P. (1989). The relation between problem categorization and problem-solving among novices and experts. Memory & Cognition, 17, 627-638.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem-solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem-solving. American Journal of Physics, 60, 627 - 636. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1711....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Kim, E., & Pak, S. J. (2002). Students do not overcome conceptual difficulties after solving 1000 traditional problems. American Journal of Physics, 70(7), 759 – 765. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1484....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Knight, R. D. (2002). An instructor’s guide to introductory physics. Addison Wesley, San Francisco.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Larkin, J. H. (1981). Cognition of learning physics. American Journal of Physics, 49, 534. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1266....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Lea, S. M. (1994). Comparing problem-solving performance of physics students in inquire-based and traditional introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 62, 627–633.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Leonard, W. J., Dufresne, R. J., & Mestre, J. P. (1996). Using qualitative problem-solving strategies to highlight the role of conceptual knowledge in solving problems. American Journal of Physics. 64(12), 1495-1503. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1840....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Lubben, F., Bennett, J., Hogarth, S. & Robinson, A. (2005). A systematic review of the effects of context-based and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science on boys and girls, and on lower-ability pupils. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Lye, H., Fry, M., & Hart, C. (2001). What does it mean to teach physics ‘in context’: A first case study. Australian Science Teachers, 48(1), 16-22.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Mashood, K. K., & Singh, V. A. (2015). Rotational kinematics of a rigid body about a fixed axis: development and analysis of an inventory. European Journal of Physics, 36, 045020. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Mazur, E. (1992). Qualitative vs. quantitative thinking: Are we teaching the right thing? Optics and Photonics news, 3, 38.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction - A user’s manual. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
McCormick, R. (1996). Instructional methodology. In P. J. Williams & A. P. Williams (Eds.), Technology education for teachers (pp. 63–92). Melbourne: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
McCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and procedural knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1–2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
McDermott, L. (1984). Students’ conceptions and problem-solving in mechanics. Physics Today, 37(7), 24 – 32.
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
McDermott, L. (1991). What we teach and what is learned – Closing the gap. American Journal of Physics, 59(4), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1653....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
McDermott, L. C., Rosenquist, M. L., & van Zee, E. H. (1987). Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics. American Journal of Physics, 55(6), 503-513. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1510....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
McDermott, L. C., Shaffer, P. S., & the Physics Education Group at the University of Washington (2002). Tutorials in Introductory Physics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Mestre, J. P. (1994). Cognitive aspects of learning and teaching science. In S.J. Fitzsimmons & L.C. Kerpelman (Eds.), Teacher enhancement for elementary and secondary science and mathematics: Status, issues and problems (pp.3-1 – 3-53). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation (NSF 94 – 80).
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Mihret, Z. (2014). An investigation of students’ approaches to problem-solving in physics courses. International Journal of Chemical and Natural Science, 2(1), 77-89.
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Ministry of Education. (2010). Physics Student Textbook: Grade 11. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Moelter, M. J., Hoellwarth, C. & Knight, R. D. (2005). A direct comparison of conceptual learning and problem-solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms. Am. J. Phys., 73, 459 - 462.
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Mualem, R., & Eylon, B.S. (2007). “Physics with a smile” – Explaining phenomena with a qualitative problem-solving strategy. The Physics Teacher, 45(3), 158 – 163. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2709....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem-solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Panprueksa, K. (2012). Development of Science Instructional Model Emphasizing Contextual Approach to Enhance Analytical Thinking and Application of Knowledge for Lower Preparatory School Students (Unpublished Doctoral thesis), Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok.
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Peşman, H. (2012). Method-Approach Interaction: The Effects of Learning Cycle Vs Traditional and Contextual Vs Non-Contextual Instruction on 11th Grade Students’ Achievement in and Attitudes Towards Physics (Unpublished Doctoral thesis), Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Peşman, H., & Özdemir, Ö. F. (2012) Approach–Method Interaction: The role of teaching method on the effect of context-based approach in physics instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2127-2145. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Rayner, A. (2005). Reflections on context-based science teaching: A case study of physics students for physiotherapy. Poster presented at the annual UniServe Science Blended Learning Symposium Proceedings. Sydney, Australia, 169-172, September 30, 2005.
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Redish, E. F. (2005). Changing student ways of knowing: What should our students learn in a physics class? To be published in proceedings of World view on physics education 2005: Focusing on change, New Delhi. Retrieved from http://www.physics.umd.edu/per....
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
Reif F., & Scott, L. (1999). Teaching scientific thinking skills: Students and computers coaching each other. American Journal of Physics, 67(2), 819 – 831. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1913....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
Reif, F., & Heller, J. I. (1982). Knowledge structure and problem-solving in physics. Educational Psychologist, 17(2), 102 – 127. https://doi.org/10.1080/004615....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
47.
Selçuk, G. S., Çalışkan, S., & Erol, M. (2008). The Effects of Problem-solving Instruction on Physics Achievement, Problem-solving Performance and Strategy Use. Latin American Journal Physics Education, 2(3), 151 – 166.
Google Scholar
 
 
48.
Shishigu, A., Bashu B., Tesfaw, B., & Gadisa, S. (2016). The Effect of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Instruction on Students’ Motivation and Problem-solving Skills of Physics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 857-871. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
49.
Shishigu, A., Hailu, A., & Anibo, Z. (2017). Problem-Based Learning and Conceptual Understanding of College Female Students in Physics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmst....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
50.
Taasoobshirazi, G., & Carr, M. (2008). A review and critique of context-based physics instruction and assessment. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edur....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
51.
Trowbridge, D., & McDermott, L. (1981). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension. American Journal of Physics, 49(3), 242 – 253. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1252....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
52.
Walsh, L. (2009). A phenomenographic study of introductory physics students: Approaches to problem-solving and conceptualization of knowledge (Doctorate Thesis), Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7359....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
53.
Walsh, L. N., Howard, R. G., & Bowe, B. (2007). Phenomenographic study of students’ problem-solving approaches in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3, 020108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRe....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
54.
Wilson, J. D., & Buffa, A. J. (2002). College Physics (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
 
 
55.
Young, H. D., Freedmand, R. A., Dandin, T. R., & Lewis, A. (1999). Sears and Zemansky’s University Physics (10th ed.). New York, Addison Wesley.
Google Scholar
 
 
56.
Yu, K. C., Fan, S. C., & Lin, K. Y. (2014). Enhancing students’ problem-solving skills through context-based learning. International of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 64-78.
Google Scholar
 
 
57.
Zhu, Z. (2007). Gender differences in mathematical problem solving patterns: A review of literature. International Education Journal, 8(2), 187-203.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
Evaluating problem-solving and procedural skills of first-year students in a Peruvian higher education institution
Extent of Implementation of Inquiry-based Science Teaching and Learning in Ghanaian Junior High Schools
Comparative Study of Divergent Thinking among Participants in a German Science Competition and Pupils in a Control Group
The effect of using PDEODE teaching strategy supported by the e-learning environment in teaching mathematics for developing the conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills among primary stage students
Making It Count: Strategies for Improving Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics for Students and Teachers’ Classroom Management
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top