RESEARCH PAPER
Examining preservice science teachers' perspectives on the social responsibility of scientists and engineers
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Business Informatics and Mathematical Methods in Economics, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA
 
2
Kumertau Branch, Orenburg State University, Orenburg, RUSSIA
 
3
Department of Financial Markets and Financial Engineering, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
4
Department of Foreign Languages, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, RUSSIA
 
5
Department of State and Legal Disciplines, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
6
Department of Medical and Social Assessment, Emergency, and Ambulatory Practice, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-07-04
 
 
Publication date: 2023-08-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2023;19(8):em2315
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to examine preservice science teachers’ views on the social responsibility of scientists and engineers. A total of 153 students enrolled in Russian public university formed as the participants. We assessed the social responsibility of pre-service teachers using a scale, “Views of Social Responsibility of Scientists and Engineers” (VSRoSE), developed by previous researchers, and included eight different areas of social responsibility. The results indicated that the preservice biology, chemistry, and science teachers who participated in this study had high awareness of human welfare and safety, a sustainable environment, and consideration for social risks and impacts. However, their awareness related to practice and participation was relatively low. Female students had more scores than male students in all areas. The results also revealed that chemistry students had slightly higher average scores than the other majors in all areas of the scale. The average scores in all age groups showed slight differences. This study provides a starting point for researchers and teachers to comprehend preservice science teachers’ views on the social responsibility of scientists and engineers in resolving humanity’s greatest problems from the perspective of preservice science teachers. With this respect, this study contributes insightful information to the literature and fills a gap in the research. We hope that future researchers will concentrate on enhancing pre-service teachers’ understanding of the social responsibility of scientists and engineers and on educating more socially responsible teachers who recognize the importance of science and engineering research’s impact on society. This study also indicates that PSTS were less concerned with the role of social responsibility in promoting scientific research in science and engineering. This finding suggests the necessity of emphasizing the positive impact of science and engineering research on society and the significance of incorporating social impact into teacher education. This emphasis on the significance of social responsibility will assist in comprehending the effects of science and engineering within a social context on professional responsibility.
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Beckwith, J., & Huang, F. (2005). Should we make a fuss? A case for social responsibility in science. Nature Biotechnology, 23(12), 1479-1480. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt120....
 
2.
Bergmark, U., & Alerby, E. (2006). Ethics of care—a dilemma or a challenge in education? [Paper presentation]. The Australian Association for Research in Education National Conference (AARE), Adelaide, 27–30 November.
 
3.
Bielefeldt, A. R., & Canney, N. E. (2016). Changes in the social responsibility attitudes of engineering students over time. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5), 1535-1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948....
 
4.
Canney, N. E., & Bielefeldt, A. R. (2015). A framework for the development of social responsibility in engineers. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1B), 414-424.
 
5.
Erna, M., Alimin, M., Lee, H., Suryawati, E., Albeta, S. W., & Priyambada, G. (2023). Enhancing Indonesian college students’ views of social responsibility of scientists and engineers: The enact model intervention. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), em2240. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
6.
Godhade, J., & Hundekari, S. (2018). Social responsibility of engineers. International Journal of Academic Research and Development, 3(2), 125-126.
 
7.
Ko, Y., Shim, S. S., & Lee, H. (2021). Development and validation of a scale to measure views of social responsibility of scientists and engineers (VSRoSE). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
8.
Ko, Y., Shim, S. S., Hwang, Y., Choi, Y., Ok, S. Y., Nam, C. H., & Lee, H. (2022). Exploring the views of college students in STEM fields on the social responsibility of scientists and engineers. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 25(2), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.....
 
9.
Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925-953. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
10.
Lee, H., Ko, Y., & Hong, J. (2022). ENACT project: Promoting pre-service science teachers’ views on the social responsibility of scientists and engineers. Journal of The Korean Association for Science Education, 42(1), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase....
 
11.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press.
 
12.
Sakharov, A. (1981). The responsibility of scientists. Nature, 291, 184-185. https://doi.org/10.1038/291184....
 
13.
Sedano Aguilar, W. (2022). Interpretation of reality in sustainability processes: Dialogues in the framework of global warming. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(3), e2293. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese....
 
14.
Sevenhuijsen, S. (2003). The place of care. The relevance of the ethics of care for social policy. In S. Sevenhuijsen, & A. Svab (Eds.), Labyrinths of care (pp. 13-41). Peace Institute. https://doi.org/10.1177/146470....
 
15.
Sharma, M., Davis, R. E., & Wilkerson, A. H. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among college students: A theory-based analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4617. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
 
16.
Zandvoort, H., Børsen, T., Deneke, M., & Bird, J. (2013). Editors’ overview: Perspectives on teaching social responsibility to students in science and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 14131438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948....
 
17.
Zhang, S. (2023). Chinese pre-service science teachers’ views of the social responsibility of scientists and engineers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(3), 538-548. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top