SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER
Exploration of the Role of Intellectual Property as a Moderator in the Correlation between Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance
 
More details
Hide details
1
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, TAIWAN
 
2
Department of International Business, Hsing-Wu University, TAIWAN
 
3
Department of Finance, Hsing-Wu University, New Taipei TAIWAN
 
 
Online publication date: 2017-11-24
 
 
Publication date: 2017-11-24
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(12):8233-8247
 
This article belongs to the special issue "Problems of Application Analysis in Knowledge Management and Science-Mathematics-Education".
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This study is to verify the relationship between ownership structure and corporate performance, as well as the persistence of the relationship, by means of the relevant information of value creation provided by intellectual property. More than four thousand data of Taiwan listed companies during the period of 2002-2011 are analyzed in this research. Dynamic perspective is adopted to develop the persistence of the relationship between ownership structure and corporate performance. Regression results show that potentially non-linear relationship exists in the relationship between ownership and corporate performance. Evidence demonstrates that the impact of ownership on performance is a kind of corporate life cycle function, especially in the maturity stage as well as in the high-tech industry where it is particularly obvious. More importantly, the concept of intellectual property and the ownership mechanism of different industry attributes provide different information about value creation in different life cycle processes through dynamic design approach. For robustness, the measured variables of ownership are further lagged by a period to alleviate potential endogeneity issue. Overall, this study mainly contributes to extending the importance of corporate life cycle, and through this, more finely assessing the effect of ownership and the impact on corporate performance.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Berle, A. A., G. G. C. Means (1932) The modern corporation and private property. Transaction Books.
 
2.
Black, E. L. (1998) Life-cycle Impacts on the Incremental Value-relevance of Earnings and Cash Flow Measures. The Journal of Financial Statement Analysis, 4(1), 40-56.
 
3.
Bukh, P. N., H. T. Larsen, J. Mouritsen (2001) Constructing Intellectual Capital Statements. Journal of Management, 17(1), 87-108.
 
4.
Chan, S. H., J. D. Martin, J. W. Kensinger (1990) Corporate Research and Development Expenditures and Share Value. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 255-276.
 
5.
Cho, M. H. (1998) Ownership Structure, Investment, and the Corporate Value: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 47(1), 103-121.
 
6.
Demsetz, H., B. Villalonga (2001) Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), 209-233.
 
7.
Faccio, M., M. A. Lasfer (2000) Do Occupational Pension Funds Monitor Companies in which They Hold Large Stakes? Journal of Corporate Finance, 6(1), 71-110.
 
8.
Fan, J. P., T. J. Wong (2002) Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of accounting and economics, 33(3), 401-425.
 
9.
Himmelberg, C. P., R. G. Hubbard, D. Palia (1999) Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link between Ownership and Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(3), 353-384.
 
10.
Hurwitz, J., S. Lines, B. Montgomery, J. Schmidt (2002) The Linkage Between Management Practices, Intangibles Performance and Stock Returns. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(1), 51-61.
 
11.
Jensen, G. R., D. P. Solberg, T. S. Zorn (1992) Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(02), 247-263.
 
12.
Jensen, M. C., R. S. Ruback (1983) The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence. Journal of Financial economics, 11(1), 5-50.
 
13.
Jensen, M. C., W. H.Meckling (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
 
14.
Johanson, U., M. Märtensson, M. Skoog (2001) Measuring to Understand Intangible Performance Drivers. European Accounting Review, 10(3), 407-437.
 
15.
Kamath, G. B. (2008) Intellectual capital and corporate performance in Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 684-704.
 
16.
Kapopoulos, P., S. Lazaretou (2007) Corporate Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence From Greek Firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 144-158.
 
17.
Lewis, V. L., N. C. Churchill (1983) The Five Stages of Small Business Growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30-50.
 
18.
Lichtenberg, F. R., G. M. Pushner (1994) Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance in Japan. Japan and the World Economy, 6(3), 239-261.
 
19.
Mavridis, D. G. (2005) Intellectual Capital Performance Determinants and Globalization Status of Greek Listed Firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(1), 127-140.
 
20.
McConnell, J. J., H. Servaes, K. V. Lins (2008) Changes in Insider Ownership and Changes in the Market Value of the Firm. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(2), 92-106.
 
21.
Moh’d, M. A., L. G. Perry, J. N. Rimbey (1998) The Impact of Ownership Structure On Corporate Debt Policy: a Time‐Series Cross‐Sectional Analysis. Financial Review, 33(3), 85-98.
 
22.
Morck, R., A. Shleifer, R. W. Vishny (1988) Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315.
 
23.
Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of Corporate Borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147-175.
 
24.
Pound, J. (1988) Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 237-265.
 
25.
Ramaswamy, V., C. J. Ueng, L. Carl (2008) Corporate Governance Characteristics of Growth Companies: An Empirical Study. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 21-23.
 
26.
Saaty, T. L. (2005) The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Processes for the Measurement of Intangible Criteria and for Decision-Making. In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys,345-405.
 
27.
Tseng, C. Y., Y. J. James Goo (2005) Intellectual Capital and Corporate Value in an Emerging Economy: Empirical Study of Taiwanese Manufacturers. R&D Management, 35(2), 187-201.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top