RESEARCH PAPER
Exploring science teachers’ views about the nature of science and the implications on their pedagogical content knowledge: A case of 11 in-service South African teachers
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Limpopo, Sovenga, SOUTH AFRICA
 
 
Publication date: 2024-01-03
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(1):em2384
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study explored science teachers’ views of the nature of science (NOS) and the implications on their pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). The study follows a qualitative approach and uses a single case study design that followed 11 science teachers. The study uses PCK for science teaching as a framework, where the participants were requested to complete the views of NOS questionnaire (VNOS-D+) and each was observed two times in their science classrooms. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of teachers’ PCK in teaching science. The study found that the majority of the participants reflected informed views of NOS. Although the majority of the teachers had a good understanding of the goals and objectives of science education and their solid content knowledge. They had poor knowledge of learners’ understanding of science, choice of instructional strategies, and choice of assessment techniques for scientific literacy.
REFERENCES (77)
1.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)...<417::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E.
 
2.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)...<295::aid-tea2>3.0.co;2-2.
 
3.
Akerson, V. L., Pongsanon, K., Park Rogers, M., Cater, M., & Galindo, E. (2017). Exploring the impact of a university course on preservice science teachers’ views of the nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(2), 117-138.
 
4.
Alabdulkareem, S. A. (2016). The impact of science teachers’ beliefs on teaching science: The case of Saudi science teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(2), 233. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5....
 
5.
Allchin, D. (2014). Achieving scientific literacy: Strategies for teaching NOS in context. The Science Education Review, 13(1), 31-37.
 
6.
Alonzo, A. C., & Kim, J. (2015). Declarative and dynamic pedagogical content knowledge as elicited through two video-based interview methods. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(8), 1259-1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21....
 
7.
Aslan, O., & Tasar, M. F. (2013). Investigation of Turkish science teachers’ views about the nature of science. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 311-315.
 
8.
Ayala-Villamil, L.-A., & García-Martínez, Á. (2021). VNOS: A historical review of an instrument on the nature of science. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(2), e2238. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese....
 
9.
Ayala-Villamil, M. A., & Garcia-Martinez, M. A. (2020). The nature of science: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Research in science teaching, 57(1), 1-25.
 
10.
Bartos, S. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2014). Teachers’ understanding and teaching of the nature of science: An updated review of the literature. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(6), 767-792.
 
11.
Bell, R. L. (2009). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(1), 1-14.
 
12.
Bhandari, R. B. (2020). Qualitative research: A practical guide. Routledge.
 
13.
Brown, D. E., Friedrichsen, P. M., & Abell, S. K. (2013). Understanding and teaching the nature of science: An overview of empirical research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(6), 653-667.
 
14.
Carmen, A. Z. (2006). Recruiting native American college students: “Why don’t they just show up from their high schools like other students do?”. University of Oregon.
 
15.
Chanetsa, T. F. (2016). South African science teachers’ repertoire of practices in the teaching of nature of science [Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand].
 
16.
Chen, B., & Wei, B. (2015). Examining chemistry teachers’ use of curriculum materials: In view of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00....
 
17.
Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248....
 
18.
Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Santibáñez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara, C. (2019). Correction to: A critical review of students’ and teachers’ understandings of nature of science. Science & Education, 29(1), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
19.
Cronje, A. (2015). Epistemological border-crossing between western science and indigenous knowledge and its implications for teacher professional development [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Johannesburg.
 
20.
Cronje, A., de Beer, J., & Ankiewicz, P. (2015). The development and use of an instrument to investigate science teachers’ views on indigenous knowledge. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/102884....
 
21.
DBE. (2011a). Curriculum and assessment policy statement for life sciences grade 10-12. Department of Basic Education.
 
22.
DEB. (2011b). Curriculum and assessment policy statement: Mathematics and physical sciences (grade 10-12). Government Printing Works.
 
23.
Dekkers, P., & Mnisi, S. (2003). South African natural science teachers’ views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 253-269.
 
24.
Demirdogen, B. (2016). Interaction between science teaching orientation and pedagogical content knowledge components. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 495-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972....
 
25.
Demirdogen, B., Hanuscin, D. L., Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., & Koseoglu, F. (2015). Development and nature of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science. Research in Science Education, 46(4), 575-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
26.
Demirdogen, B., Kavak, N., & Turgut, M. (2016). Pre-service science teachers’ understanding of nature of science: A longitudinal study. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 39-47.
 
27.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajt....
 
28.
Frambach, J. M., van der Vleuten, C. P., & Durning, S. J. (2013). AM last page. Quality criteria in qualitative and quantitative research. Academic Medicine, 88(4), 552. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b....
 
29.
Gorelick, R. (2014). Indigenous sciences are not pseudosciences. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution, 7(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.4033/iee.20....
 
30.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College Pr.
 
31.
Hacieminoglu, E. (2014). In-service teachers’ perceptions regarding their practices related to integrating nature of science: Case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1268-1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsp....
 
32.
Haidar, A. H. (1999). Emirates pre-service and in-service teachers’ views about the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 807-822. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
33.
Haidar, A.H. (1999). Epistemological views of science teachers: Coherence and change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 257-277.
 
34.
Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education, 95(1), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20....
 
35.
Hanuscin, D.L. (2013). Approaches to teaching nature of science: Investigating instructional strategies used by practicing scientists and science faculty. Science Education, 97(4), 574-590.
 
36.
Higgins, J., & Moeed, A. (2017). Fostering curiosity in science classrooms: Inquiring into practice using cogenerative dialoguing. Science Education International, 28(3), 190-198. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v....
 
37.
Johnson, M. L. (2006). Mind, metaphor, law. Mercer Law Review, 58, 845.
 
38.
Kaya, E. (2012). The nature of science as a foundation for fostering a better understanding of evolution. Science & Education, 21(9), 1249-1264.
 
39.
Khuzwayo, M. E., & Khuzwayo, H. B. (2020). Baseline assessment in the elementary mathematics classroom: Should it be optional or mandatory for teaching and learning? International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(8), 330-349. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlte....
 
40.
Kunene, M. (2014). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and learners’ science achievement in South African primary schools. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 7, 1,.
 
41.
Lankford, D. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Science & Education, 19(6-8), 707-729.
 
42.
Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916-929. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)...<916::aid-tea2>3.0.co;2-a.
 
43.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831-879). Routledge.
 
44.
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2010). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, volume II. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020....
 
45.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10....
 
46.
Linneman, S. R., Lynch, P., Kurup, R., Webb, P., & Bantwini, B. (2003). South African science teachers’ perceptions of the nature of science. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/102884....
 
47.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Science & technology education library (pp. 95-132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-....
 
48.
McCall, A. (2008). Investigating the efficacy of an intervention designed to promote acceptance of scientific concepts among secondary school learners in a rural South African District [Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand].
 
49.
McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 53-70). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-....
 
50.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Pearson.
 
51.
Mellado, V., Bermejo, M. L., Blanco, L. J., & Ruiz, C. (2007). The classroom practice of a prospective secondary biology teacher and his conceptions of the nature of science and of teaching and learning science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 37-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
52.
Mesci, G. (2020). The influence of PCK-based NOS teaching on pre-service science teachers’ NOS views. Science & Education, 29(3), 743-769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
53.
Mesci, G., Schwartz, R. S., & Pleasants, B. A.-S. (2020). Enabling factors of preservice science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science and nature of scientific inquiry. Science & Education, 29(2), 263-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
54.
Mpeta, M., de Villiers, J. J. R., & Fraser, W. J. (2014). Secondary school learners’ response to the teaching of evolution in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Journal of Biological Education, 49(2), 150-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/002192....
 
55.
Mthethwa-Kunene, E., Onwu, G. O., & de Villiers, R. (2015). Exploring biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in the teaching of genetics in Swaziland science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1140-1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
56.
Ndeke, G. C., Okere, M. I., & Keraro, F. N. (2015). Secondary school biology teachers’ perceptions of scientific creativity. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5....
 
57.
Ndeke, R., & Keraro, F. N. (2017). Science teachers’ perceptions of the nature of science (NOS) in relation to their classroom practice. International Journal of Science Education, 39(12), 1599-1615.
 
58.
Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1996). Probing teachers’ views of the nature of science: How should we do it and where should we be looking. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science education in Europe (pp. 283-295). Falmer Press.
 
59.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281-316.
 
60.
Otulaja, F.S., Cameron, K., & Msimanga, A. (2011). Integrating indigenous knowledge in science classrooms through argumentation: The teachers’ role. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2), 136-146.
 
61.
Ramnarain, U., & Padayachee, K. (2015). A comparative analysis of South African life sciences and biology textbooks for inclusion of the nature of science. South African Journal of Education, 35(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.15700/20150....
 
62.
Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008). The place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1365-1387. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
63.
Roy, S., & Bairagya, S. (2019). Conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of science from Shulman’s notion to refined consensus model (RCM): A journey. Journal of Dialogue on Education, 8(2), 10-53.
 
64.
Sarieddine, D., & BouJaoude, S. (2014). Influence of teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science on classroom practice. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
65.
Sarkar, S., & Gomes, D. (2010). Science teachers’ views of nature of science: A critical review of research. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 11-32.
 
66.
Senanayake, S. G. (2006). Indigenous knowledge as a key to sustainable development. Journal of Agricultural Sciences–Sri Lanka, 2(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.4038/jas.v2....
 
67.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
 
68.
Snively, G., & Corsiglia, J. (2001). Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85(1), 6-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2...<6::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-R.
 
69.
Steenkamp, J., De Beer, J., & Petersen, N. (2019). The conundrum of integrating indigenous knowledge in science curriculum themes: A review of different viewpoints. https://uir.unisa.ac.za/.
 
70.
Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 297-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422....
 
71.
Wahbeh, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Revisiting the translation of nature of science understandings into instructional practice: Teachers’ nature of science pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36(3), 425-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
72.
Waters‐Adams, S. (2006). The relationship between understanding of the nature of science and practice: The influence of teachers’ beliefs about education, teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 919-944. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
73.
Webb, P. (2007). Teachers’ understandings of the nature of science. The epiSTEME Reviews, 2, 62-78.
 
74.
Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE.
 
75.
Yoon, S. A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Klopfer, E. (2014). Developing and validating a learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(10), 1282-1312.
 
76.
Zeidler, D. L. (2002). Dancing with maggots and saints: Visions for subject matter knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015....
 
77.
Zinyeka, G., Onwu, G. O. M., & Braun, M. (2016). A truth-based epistemological framework for supporting teachers in integrating indigenous knowledge into science teaching. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(3), 256-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/181172....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top