RESEARCH PAPER
Exploring teachers’ epistemological framing through classroom discourse in 6E-STEM classes: From perception to practice
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Physics, Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi, VIETNAM
 
2
Center for Research and Teacher Professional Development, Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi, VIETNAM
 
3
Department of Education and Futures Design, Tamkang University, Taipei, TAIWAN
 
4
Tunghai University, Taichung, TAIWAN
 
5
Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, TAIWAN
 
6
Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, TAIWAN
 
7
Department of Biology, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, INDONESIA
 
 
Publication date: 2024-09-02
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(9):em2501
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study investigated teachers’ enactments in 6E-STEM implementation with technology integration. Teachers’ professional development utilized coaching and examining teaching and learning as strategies. Coaches trained three Vietnamese teachers for content, pedagogical content, and technological pedagogical knowledge through intensive STEM curriculum examples. Basic electrical engineering and application of technology for science learning curriculum was designed in 6E instructional model. In addition, CloudClassRoom was integrated with the curriculum to record students’ performance. After coaching, three teachers had practical teaching with 107 students in junior high schools. Each class was implemented in three classes. Examining teaching and learning was conducted to investigate teachers’ epistemological framing in teaching 6E-STEM. Classroom videotapes, and teachers’ responses to interviews were analyzed by NVivo. The key results show that delivering an artifact was a function of teachers’ framings in STEM teaching. However, teachers desired students to provide engineering knowledge, socialize scientific explanations, or develop students’ creativities depending on the individual.
REFERENCES (47)
1.
Aslam, F., Adefila, A., & Bagiya, Y. (2018). STEM outreach activities: An approach to teachers’ professional development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(1), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/026074....
 
2.
Awad, N. A., Salman, E., & Barak, M. (2019). Integrating teachers to teach an interdisciplinary STEM-focused program about sound, waves and communication systems. European Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejste....
 
3.
Burke, B. N. (2014). The ITEEA 6E learning ByDesignTM model: Maximizing informed design and inquiry in the integrative STEM classroom. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 73(6), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/978144....
 
4.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education? Science, 329(5995), Article 996. https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc....
 
5.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
 
6.
Capobianco, B. M., & Rupp, M. (2014). STEM teachers’ planned and enacted attempts at implementing engineering design-based instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 258-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12....
 
7.
Capobianco, B. M., DeLisi, J., & Radloff, J. (2017). Characterizing elementary teachers’ enactment of high-leverage practices through engineering design-based science instruction. Science Education, 102(2), 342-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21....
 
8.
Chien, Y.-T., & Chang, C.-Y. (2015). Supporting socio-scientific argumentation in the classroom through automatic group formation based on students’ real-time responses. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Science education in East Asia (pp. 549-563). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
9.
Chung, C. C., Lin, C. L., & Lou, S. J. (2018). Analysis of the learning effectiveness of the STEAM-6E special course-a case study about the creative design of IoT assistant devices for the elderly. Sustainability, 10(9), Article 3040. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1009....
 
10.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131....
 
11.
Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554-567. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10....
 
12.
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594....
 
13.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.
 
14.
Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Harwell, M. (2016). Building up stem: An analysis of teacher-developed engineering design-based stem integration curricular materials. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 6(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9....
 
15.
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2003). Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 53-90. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327....
 
16.
Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers’ implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
17.
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. In STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612.
 
18.
Hsu, Y.-S, & Fang, S.-C. (2019). Opportunities and challenges of STEM education. In Y.-S. Hsu, & Y.-F. Yeh (Eds.), Asia-Pacific STEM teaching practices: From theoretical frameworks to practices (pp. 1-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98....
 
19.
Jin, H., Wei, X., Duan, P., Guo, Y., & Wang, W. (2016). Promoting cognitive and social aspects of inquiry through classroom discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 319-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
20.
Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Moore, T. J. (2015). STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education. In C. C. Johnson, E. E. Peters-Burton, & T. J. Moore (Eds.), STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131....
 
21.
Kim, M. S., & Keyhani, N. (2019). Understanding STEM teacher learning in an informal setting: A case study of a novice STEM teacher. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039....
 
22.
Knowles, J. G., Kelley, T. R., & Holland, J. D. (2018). Increasing teacher awareness of STEM careers. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 19(3), 47-55.
 
23.
Krystyniak, R. A., & Heikkinen, H. W. (2007). Analysis of verbal interactions during an extended, open-inquiry general chemistry laboratory investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1160-1186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20....
 
24.
Lin, K. Y., Hsiao, H. S., Williams, P. J., & Chen, Y. H. (2020). Effects of 6E-oriented STEM practical activities in cultivating middle school students’ attitudes toward technology and technological inquiry ability. Research in Science and Technological Education, 38(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/026351....
 
25.
Lin, P.-L., Nguyen, K. T. T., Ko, S. W., Nguyen, V. H., Nguyen, V. B., & Chang, C.-Y. (2019). New generation of STEM for new southbound countries: In-service teacher-training workshop between Taiwan and Vietnam [Poster presentation]. The 2019 Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
 
26.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Corwin Press.
 
27.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/978145....
 
28.
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594....
 
29.
Moore, T. J., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Advancing the state of the art of STEM integration. Journal of STEM Education, 15(1), 5-10.
 
30.
Moore, T. J., Miller, R. L., Lesh, R. A., Stohlmann, M. S., & Kim, Y. R. (2013). Modeling in engineering: The role of representational fluency in students’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), 141-178. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20....
 
31.
Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H.-H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In Ş. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. E. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices (pp. 35-60). Purdue University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6....
 
32.
Nguyen, V. B., Tuong, D. H., Tran, M. D., Nguyen, V. H., Chu, C. T., Nguyen, A. T., Doan, V. T., & Tran, B. T. (2019). STEM education in secondary schools (T. Le Van, Ed.). Vietnam Education Publishing House Limited Company.
 
33.
Nguyen, K. T. T., Nguyen, V. B., Lin, P.-L., Lin, J., & Chang, C.-Y. (2020). Measuring teachers’ perceptions to sustain STEM education development. Sustainability, 12(4), Article 1531. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1204....
 
34.
NRC. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. In A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165.
 
35.
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
 
36.
Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594....
 
37.
Singer, J. E., Ross, J. M., & Jackson-Lee, Y. (2016). Professional development for the integration of engineering in high school STEM classrooms. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 6(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9....
 
38.
Smith, E. L., Parker, C. A., McKinney, D., & Grigg, J. (2018). Conditions and decisions of urban elementary teachers regarding instruction of STEM curriculum. School Science and Mathematics Association, 118(5), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12....
 
39.
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), Article 02. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejste....
 
40.
Vossen, T. E., Henze, I., Rippe, R. C. A., Van Driel, J. H., & De Vries, M. J. (2019). Attitudes of secondary school STEM teachers towards supervising research and design activities. Research in Science Education, 51, 891-911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
41.
Wahono, B., & Chang, C. Y. (2019). Assessing teacher’s attitude, knowledge, and application (AKA) on STEM: An effort to foster the sustainable development of STEM education. Sustainability, 11(4), Article 950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1104....
 
42.
Wahono, B., Lin, P. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, Article 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594....
 
43.
Wang, H.-H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5703/128828....
 
44.
Wendell, K. B., Swenson, J. E. S., & Dalvi, T. S. (2019). Epistemological framing and novice elementary teachers’ approaches to learning and teaching engineering design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(7), 956-982. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21....
 
45.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878-903. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21....
 
46.
Yildirim, B. (2016). An analyses and meta-synthesis of research on STEM education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(34), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.20....
 
47.
Zhao, N., Witzig, S. B., Weaver, J. C., Adams, J. E., & Schmidt, F. (2004). Transformative professional development: Inquiry-based college science teaching institutes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 18-25.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top