Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
RESEARCH PAPER
Factors Underlying Metacognitive Judgements in Foundation Chemistry
1
University of Pretoria, Groenkloof Campus, SOUTH AFRICA
Online publication date: 2019-03-21
Publication date: 2019-03-21
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2019;15(5):em1712
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES (32)
1.
Adedokun, O. A., & Burgess, W. D. (2012). Analysis of paired dichotomous data: a gentle introduction to the McNemar test in SPSS. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 8(17), 125–131.
2.
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., & Silberstein, J. (1988). Theories, principles and laws. Education in Chemistry, 89–92.
3.
Beyer, S. (1999). Gender differences in the accuracy of grade expectancies and evaluations. Sex Roles, 41(314), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018....
4.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/147808....
5.
Dunlosky, J., Serra, M. J., Matvey, G., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Second-order judgements about judgements of learning. The Journal of General Psychology, 132(4), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.3200/GENP.1....
6.
Ehrlinger, J. (2008). Skill level, self-views and self-theories as sources of error in performance evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751....
7.
Fernandez-Duque, D., & Black, S. E. (2007). Metacognitive judgment and denial of deficit: Evidence from frontotemporal dementia. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(5), 359–370.
8.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new era of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-0....
9.
Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (2nd Ed.). New York: Wiley.
10.
Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Bahbahani, K. (2008). Explaining calibration accuracy in classroom contexts: the effects of incentives, reflection, and explanatory style. Metacognition Learning, 3, 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409....
11.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1880....
12.
Harrits, G. S. (2011). More than method? : A discussion of paradigm differences within mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/155868....
13.
Huddle, P. A., & Pillay, A. E. (1996). An in-depth study of misconceptions in stoichiometry and chemical equilibrium at a South African university. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)...<65::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N.
14.
Jing, L., Kazuhisa, N., & Yuejia, L. (2003). Neural correlates of “feeling-of-not-knowing”: evidence from functional MRI. Chinese Science Bulletin, 48(2), 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1360/03tb90....
15.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer assisted learning, 7(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
16.
Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know what we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2....
17.
Koriat, A. (2000). The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.2....
18.
Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one’s knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7....
19.
Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2006). Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1133–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7....
20.
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated performance evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
21.
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2011). Mixed research in counselling: Trends in the literature. Measurement and Evaluation in Counselling and Development, 44(3), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/074817....
22.
Mathabathe, K.C., & Potgieter, M. (2014). Metacognitive monitoring and learning gain in foundation chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 94–104.
23.
Maxwell, J. A., & Loomis, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. India: Sage publications.
24.
Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory. San Diego, California: Academic Press, Inc.
25.
Nowell, C., & Alston, M. R. (2007). I thought I got an A! Overconfidence across the economics curriculum. Journal of Economic Education, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.3....
26.
Nussinson, R., & Koriat, A. (2008). Correcting experience-based judgements: the perseverance of subjective experience in the face of the correction of judgement. Metacognition Learning, 3, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409....
27.
Potgieter, M., Davidowitz B., & Mathabatha S. (2007). Do they know that they don’t know? The relationship between confidence and performance of first year chemistry students at three tertiary institutions in South Africa. Presented at the 38th annual conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA) in Fremantle, WA.
28.
Ridley, D. S., Schutz, P. A., Glanz, R. S., & Weinstein, C. E. (1992). Self-regulated learning: the interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/002209....
29.
Rosenthal, D. M. (2000). Consciousness, Content, and Metacognitive Judgments. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.2....
30.
Schaefer, P. S., Williams, C. C., Goodie, A. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2004). Overconfidence and the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.....
31.
Schwartz, B. L., & Perfect, T. J. (2002). Introduction: toward an applied metacognition. In B. L. Schwartz & T. J. Perfect (Eds.), Applied Metacognition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978....
32.
Winnie, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (2010). The psychology of academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 653 – 678. https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
