12/2018 vol. 14
Stats
CC-BY 4.0
Get citation
RESEARCH PAPER
Implementing the Final Stage of Working with the Planimetric Problem While Teaching as a Means of Improving Geometry Knowledge of Schoolchildren
Natalia A. Zelenina 1
,
 
Venera G. Zakirova 2
,
 
Natalia G. Kochetova 3
,
 
Lyudmila V. Lysogorova 3
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Vyatka State University, Kirov, RUSSIA
 
2
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA
 
3
Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education, Samara, RUSSIA
 
 
Publication date: 2018-10-09
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(12):em1641
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97829
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (65)
 
KEYWORDS
mathematical problem
final stage of working with the mathematical problem
technique
results of teaching geometry
system of tasks
 
ABSTRACT
The issue under study is urgent today because there is a necessity for students to develop skills in working with the mathematical problem at the final stage of its solution in order to get excellent results while learning geometry and when encouraging intellectual and personal development. The aim of the research is to develop the theory and methodology of the final stage of working with planimetric problems as a means of improving the quality of geometry knowledge of schoolchildren. The key research method of the issue is match making between the components of the final stage of working with the mathematical problem and their corresponding operations. The research has resulted in defining the structure of the final stage of working with mathematical problems. It allowed to perform a certain set of operations composing the skill of working with the mathematical problem at the final stage of its solution. The article shows the technique for composing special tasks in order to form operations corresponding to the final stage of working with mathematical problems. It is proved that students’ ability to carry out the above described stage of solving a mathematical problem helps them to get excellent results while learning geometry. The author’s technique of teaching students to work with the mathematical problem at the final stage of its solution, proposed in the article, can be used by mathematical teachers in their practical work, by the authors of resource books for students and teachers and by students of pedagogical universities while doing their special courses.
REFERENCES (65)
1.
Akishina, E. M., Sudakova, Y. E., Prokopyev, A. I., Yakubenko, K. Y., Solovyeva, N. A., & Korzhuev, A. V. (2017). System of cultural experience development of humanities students in modern information media conditions. Man in India, 97(14), 115-127.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Artemov, A. K. (1973). On heuristic methods for teaching geometry in school. Mathematics in school, 6, 25-29.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Bahar, A., & Maker, C. J. (2015). Cognitive Backgrounds of Problem Solving: A Comparison of Open-ended vs. Closed Mathematics Problems. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11, 1531-1546.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Baranova, E. V. (1999). Methodology of applying academic studies when teaching Geometry in middle school: PhD Thesis. Saransk: Mordovia State Pedagogical Institute named after M. E. Evsevev.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Baranova, E. V. (2003). Special course of study «Academic studies in teaching Mathematics». Mathematical bulletin of pedagogical institutes and universities of Volga-Vyatka region: periodic inter-university collection of scientific and methodological papers, 7, 246-247.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Bikić, N., Maričić, S. M., & Pikula, M. (2016). The effects of differentiation of content in problem-solving in learning geometry in secondary school EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(11), 2783-2795. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Cherepanova, T. P. (1964). Teaching the variability of a problem statement is a means of stimulating mental activity of students. Mathematics in school, 5, 36-39.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Collis, K. F., Watson, J. M., & Campbell, K. J. (1993). Cognitive functioning in mathematical problem solving during early adolescence Mathematics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0321....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Czarnocha B., & Baker, W. (2016). The Creative Enterprise of Mathematics Teaching Research: Elements of Methodology and Practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Demchenkova, N. A. (2000). Problem-searching tasks as a means of developing research skills in future mathematics teachers when learning Mathematics teaching techniques for pedagogical universities: PhD thesis. Saransk: Mordovia State Pedagogical Institute named after M. E. Evsevev.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Domkina, G. V., & Lapteva, T. A. (1999). One problem involves all Plane Geometry. Mathematics, 40, 28-30.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Evnin, A. Y. (2000). Studying a mathematical problem as a means of developing creative abilities of students: PhD Thesis. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Galushkin, A. A. (2018). The use of information and communications technology to foster the competitiveness of the entrepreneurial organizations within the Education and Science sector. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7(3.14-Special Issue 14), 323-326.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Georgiev, V. S. (1988). Experience of stimulating students’ activity based on applying the cycles of problems. Mathematics in school, 1, 77-78.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Goldman, A. M., & Zvavich, L. I. (1990). Academic series at mathematical lessons. Mathematics in school, 5, 19-22.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Gotman, E. G. (1991). Variation of the problem about the square and its inscribed triangle. Mathematics in school, 1, 26-28.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Gotman, E. G., & Skopets, Z. A. (2000). One problem – different solutions. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Grabar M. I., & Krasnyanskaya, K. A. (1977). Application of mathematical statistics in pedagogical research. Non-parametric methods. Moscow: Pedagogy.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Gu, F., Huang, R., & Gu, L. (2017). Theory and Development of Teaching Through Variation in Mathematics in China. Teaching and Learning Mathematics through Variation, 2, 13-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Gu, L., Huang, R., & Marton, F. (2004). Teaching with variation: A Chinese way of promoting effective mathematics learning. In L. Fan, N. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.). How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders. Mahwah: World Scientific, 309–347. https://doi.org/10.1142/978981....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Guba, S. G. (1972). Variability of proof problems as a means of stimulating mathematical activity in students and generating their interest in the subject (PhD Thesis). Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical Institute.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Henríquez-Rivas, C., & Montoya-Delgadillo, E. (2016). The Mathematical Work of Teachers in the Transition from the Synthetic Geometry to the Analytic at Secondary School Bolema, Rio Claro, 30(54), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Ivanova, T. A. (1992). Variability of mathematical problems as a means of developing intellectual abilities in students. Development of students when teaching and learning Mathematics: Inter-university collection of research papers. N. Novgorod: NSPU named after M. Gorky, 6 – 22.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Ivanova, T. A., Perevoshchikova, E. N., Grigoryeva, T. P., & Kuznetsova, L. I. (2000). Theoretical basis for teaching Mathematics in middle school. N. Novgorod: NSPU.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Izaak, D. F. (1983). Generalizations of geometrical problems. Mathematics in school, 2, 55–57.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Izaak, D. F. (1987). Occurrence of new problems when studying geometrical problems. Mathematics in school, 6, 62-65.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Kanin, E. S., & Nagibin, F. F. (1982). The final stage of solving mathematical problems. Moscow: Prosvesheniye.
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Karpushina, N. M. (2006). Dynamic problems in teaching geometry. Mathematics in school, 3, 48-54.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Kolyagin, Y. M. (1977). Problems in teaching mathematics. Part Ι. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye.
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Kryukova, N. I., Zakharova, A. N., Dulina, G. S., Yusupova, Z. F., Belonovskaya, I. D., & Bogdanova, J. N. (2017). Didactic features of pedagogical interaction as the basis of university education. Man in India, 97(3), 29-41.
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Kuznetsova, L. I. (1992). Developing heuristic methods of mental activity in students when solving geometrical problems. Development of students when teaching and learning Mathematics: Inter-university collection of research papers. N. Novgorod: NSPU named after M. Gorky, 33–45.
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
Kvon, G. M., Vaks, V. B., Masalimova, A. R., Kryukova, N. I., Rod, Y. S., Shagieva, R. V., & Khudzhatov, M. B. (2018). Risk in implementing new electronic management systems at universities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(3), 891-902.
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Lester, F. K., & Cai, J. (2016) Can Mathematical Problem Solving Be Taught? Preliminary Answers from 30 Years of Research. Posing and Solving Mathematical Problems. Research in Mathematics Education. Cham: Springer.
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Likhota, E. A. (1983). Variability of problem statements at extra-curricular lessons. Mathematics in school, 6, 81-82.
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Melnik, N. S. (1986). On interconnected geometrical problems. Mathematics in school, 6, 48-50.
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Mostov, A. I., & Nakonechny, M. N. (1976). Solving geometrical problems in different ways. Mathematics in school, 5, 44-48.
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Mutavchi, E. P., Prokopyev, A. I., Kostyleva, G. V., Blinov, L. V., Fedorov, V. V., & Polichka, A. E. (2018). Scientific-methodical resource of student training and vocational motivation development in university.
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Espacios, 39(20), 15.
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Nedogarok, G. P. (1989). Composing geometrical problems by students as a means of generating and developing general problem solving skills (PhD Thesis). Moscow: Moscow State Pedagogical Institute.
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Olbinsky, I. B. (1998). Development of the problem. Mathematics in school, 2, 15-16.
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Olbinsky, I. B. (2002). Methodology of teaching high school students to reflexive studying mathematical problems (PhD Thesis). Moscow: Moscow Pedagogical State University.
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Pleskach, Y. A. (2014). Academic studies on Geometry as a factor of broadening learning experience in students. Achievements and prospects of Psychology and Pedagogics Collection of papers of the international research and practice conference. Ufa, Russia: Aeterna Publishing.
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Ponarin, Y. P. (1992). One problem – different solutions. Mathematics in school, 1, 15-16.
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Potapova, S. V., Danilova, I. Y., Prasolov, V. I., Makarova, E. V., & Kryukova, N. I. (2018). Mythological foundations of ontology. XLinguae, 11(2), 672-685. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.20....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
Poya, D. (1991). How to solve the problem. Lvov: Quantor.
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
Prasolov, V. V. (1988). Several proofs of the theorem on the altitudes of the triangular. Mathematics in school, 1, 72-73.
Google Scholar
 
 
47.
Roshchina, N. L. (1996). Solving problems in different ways is the first step to aesthetic perception of Geometry. Mathematics in school, 3, 17-19.
Google Scholar
 
 
48.
Roshchina, N. L. (1998). Developing aesthetic sense of students when solving planimetric problems: PhD Thesis. Moscow: Moscow Pedagogical State University.
Google Scholar
 
 
49.
Rukshin, S. E. (1981). Series problems in extra-curricular activity. Mathematics in school, 6, 62–63.
Google Scholar
 
 
50.
Russiyskaya Gazeta. (2013). Development Concept of Mathematical Education in the Russian Federation. Retrieved from http://www.rg.ru/2013/12/27/ma....
Google Scholar
 
 
51.
Sarantsev, G. I. (1995). Exercises in teaching mathematics. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye.
Google Scholar
 
 
52.
Sarantsev, G. I. (2002). Methods of teaching mathematics in secondary schools. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye.
Google Scholar
 
 
53.
Sarantsev, G. I. (2003). Aesthetic motivation in teaching Mathematics. Saransk: Mordovia State Pedagogical Institute named after M. E. Evsevev.
Google Scholar
 
 
54.
Sarantsev, G. I., & Kalinkina, T. M. (1994). Methods of obtaining knowledge as a means of arranging geometrical problems. Mathematics in school, 6, 2-4.
Google Scholar
 
 
55.
Semenov, E. E. (1995). Reflections on heuristics. Mathematics in school, 5, 39-43.
Google Scholar
 
 
56.
Skrabich, S. N. (2005). Developing the skill of composing planimetric problems based on the stated task. Educational Technologies, 4, 74-78.
Google Scholar
 
 
57.
Sullivan, P., & Clarke, D. (1992). Problem solving with conventional mathematics content: Responses of pupils to open mathematical tasks Mathematics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0321....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
58.
Tokmazov, G. V. (1994). Dynamic problems. Mathematics in school, 5, 9-12.
Google Scholar
 
 
59.
Tsukar, A. Y. (1982). Extra work on the problem. Mathematics in school, 1, 42-43.
Google Scholar
 
 
60.
Yasinovy, E. A. (1974). Composing mathematical problems by students as a means of stimulating their cognitive activity (PhD Thesis). Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical Institute.
Google Scholar
 
 
61.
Yudina, N. A. (2011). Teaching Analogy to students at the final phase of solving planimetric problems: PhD Thesis. Volgograd: Volgograd State Socio-pedagogical University.
Google Scholar
 
 
62.
Zelenina, H. A. (2003). Functions of the final stage of working with the problem. Problems of Mathematical Education and Culture: Collection of abstracts of International scientific conference. Tolyatti, Russia: TSU, 92-93.
Google Scholar
 
 
63.
Zelenina, N. A. (1998). Creative activity of students in modern educational concepts. Humanization and humanitarization of mathematical education in the school and university: papers of all-Russia scientific conference. Saransk, Russia: Mordovia State Pedagogical Institute Press, 50-52.
Google Scholar
 
 
64.
Zelenina, N. A. (2004). The final stage of solving geometric problems in the main school: PhD Thesis. Kirov: Vyatka State University of Humanities.
Google Scholar
 
 
65.
Zelenina, N. A. (2005). The structure of the final stage of solving a mathematical problem. Mathematical bulletin of pedagogical institutes and universities of Volga-Vyatka region: periodic inter-university collection of scientific and methodological papers, 7, 205-214.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
Analysis of Teaching Techniques and Scheme of Work in Teaching Chemistry in Rwandan Secondary Schools
Formation of Schoolchildren’s Creative Activity on the Final Stage of Solving a Mathematical Problem
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top