12/2017 vol. 13
Stats
CC-BY 4.0
Get citation
SPECIAL ISSUE PAPER
Innovation Performance and Influencing Factors of Expansive Listed Companies
Zhefan Piao 1
,
 
Zhaohua Xiao 1
,
 
Binbin Miao 1
,
 
Rongda Chen 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Finance, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, CHINA
 
 
Online publication date: 2017-11-16
 
 
Publication date: 2017-11-16
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(12):7755-7769
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/77923
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (36)
 
This article belongs to the special issue "Problems of Application Analysis in Knowledge Management and Science-Mathematics-Education".
KEYWORDS
internal expansion
external expansion
innovation performance
super-efficiency DEA model
Panel Tobit model
 
TOPICS
Evaluation and Assessment
Mathematics Education
 
ABSTRACT
The super efficiency DEA model and panel Tobit model were used in this study to conduct empirical research on innovation performance and its influencing factors in expansive companies based on patent and annual report data for A-shares, dilated listed companies in China from 2009 to 2015. Our results suggest that innovation performance in Chinese listed companies is generally stagnating at a low level, but scores for computer, communications equipment, electrical machinery, chemical, and pharmaceutical industries are high. There are significant differences in innovation performance between internal and external expansion companies. The internal expansion scale shows a significant negative correlation with innovation performance, while there is a “U” shaped nonlinear relationship between external expansion and innovation performance; the turning point appears when the external expansion scale is 0.2, that is, it is significantly negative to innovation performance below 0.2 (and vice versa). Firm age, firm size, executive pay, average age of executives, and depreciation have a negative impact on innovation performance, while equity concentration, capital intensity, and financial leverage have a positive impact on innovation performance.
REFERENCES (36)
1.
Acharya, V. V., & Subramanian, K. V. (2007). Bankruptcy Codes and Innovation. Ssrn Electronic Journal, 22(12), 4949-4988.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Aghion, P., & Tirole, J. (1994). Formal and Real Authority in Organizations. Working Papers, 105(1), 1-29.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Becker-Blease, J. R. (2011). Governance and innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(4), 947-958.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Bena, J., & Li, K. (2014). Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 69(5), 1923-1960.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Cameron, G., Proudman, T., & Redding, S. (2005). Technological Convergence, R&D, Trade and Productivity Growth. European Economic Review, 49(3), 519-530.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Chava, S., Oettl, A., Subramanian, A., & Subramanian, K. V. (2013). Banking deregulation and innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3), 759-774.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Chen, J., & Liu, Z. (2011). The impact of technological hyperlearning on innovation performance under the open innovation pattern. Engineer Management, 25(4), 1-7.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Chen, R. D., Wang, Z., & Yu, L. A. (2017). Importance Sampling for Credit Portfolio Risk with Risk Factors Having t-Copula. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 16(4), 1101–1124.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
d’Artis, K., & Siliverstovs, B. (2016). R&D and non-linear productivity growth. Research Policy, 45, 634–646.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Deng, Z., Lev, B., & Narin, F. (2006). Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 20-32.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Griliches, Z. (1986). Productivity, R&D and Basic Research at Firm Level in the 1970s. American Economic Review, 76(1), 141-54.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Gunawan, S., & Shieh, C. J. (2016). A Study on the Effects of Knowledge Share in Virtual Community on Creative Teaching Behaviors and Teacher Efficacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(4), 1101-1113.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32(8), 1365-1379.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Hu, X. F., & Wu, X. M. (2015). Merge and acquisition, absorptive capacity, and enterprises innovation performance—an experimental data analysis of Chinese listed medicine companies. Jiangsu social science, 2, 25-32.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Jiang, F. X., Zhang, M., & Liu, Z. B. (2008). M&A or self -investment: A Study on the expansion choice of Chinese Listed Companies. The journal of world economy, 8, 77-84.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Jiang, F. X., Zhang, M., & Lu, Z. F. (2009). Managerial overconfidence, corporate expansion and financial distress. Economic Research Journal, 1, 131-143.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Karim, S., & Mitchell, W. (2004). Innovating through acquisition and internal development: A quarter-century of boundary evolution at Johnson & Johnson. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 37(6), 525-547.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Li, H. X., & Chi, G. T. (2016). The science and technology innovation efficiency evaluation employing DEA-t test based on the enterprise as the main subject. China Management Science, 26(11), 109-119.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Li, W. J., & Zheng, M. N. (2016). Substantial Innovation or Strategic Innovation?-The Impact of Macro Industry Policy on Micro Enterprise Innovation. Economic Research Journal, 4, 60-73.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Liu, X. Q., Lin, Z. J., Sun, F. C., & Chen, H. W. (2015). The Impact of Financing Constraint and Agency Cost on R&D Investment in Enterprises-Based on Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in China. Accounting Research, 11, 62-68.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Mao, D. F., Li, J., Peng, F., & Luo, Z. Q. (2013). R&D input and cooperate TFP: An empirical test based on PSM and GPM methods. Journal of finance and economics, 4, 134-144.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Odeck, J., & Brathen, S. (2012). A meta-analysis of DEA and SFA studies of the technical efficiency of seaports: A comparison of fixed and random-effects regression models. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practices, 46(10), 1574-1585.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Richardson, S. (2006). Over-Investment of Free Cash Flow. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(2), 159-189.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Romijn, H, & Albaladejo, M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy, 31(7), 1053-1067.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Seru, A. (2014). Firm boundaries matter: Evidence from conglomerates and R&D activity. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(2), 381-405.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2013). A use of DEA-DA to measure importance of R&D expenditure in Japanese information technology industry. Decision Support Systems, 54(2), 941-952.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Tan, Y., Tian, X., Zhang, C., & Zhao, H. (2014). Privatization and Innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experience in China. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 5(2), 15-36.
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Tang, Q. Q., & Wu, C. (2014). Research on the enterprises’ inside & outside R&D investment based on synergistic effect and innovation performance. Journal of management and science, 5, 12-23.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Tong, T. W., He, W., He, Z. L., & Lu, J. (2014). Patent Regime Shift and Firm Innovation: Evidence from the Second Amendment to China’s Patent Law. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 14(1), 174-194.
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Tsai, I. C., & Lei, H. S. (2016). The Importance and Satisfaction of Collaborative Innovation for Strategic Entrepreneurship. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(3).
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Valentini, G. (2012). Measuring the effect of M&A on patenting quantity and quality. Strategic Management Journal, 33(3), 336-346l.
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
Wen, C. Y., & Liu, Z. X. (2011). The impact of technology M&A on innovation performance of high tech listed companies. Science research management, 32(5), 1-7.
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Xiong, F., Zheng, Q., & Tang, B. J. (2012). The efficiency of technology innovation in the high-tech enterprises based on DEA: an empirical analysis of Fengtai Technology Park. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 20(11), 696-701.
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Ye, L., & Wang, Y. X. (2013). Managerial overconfidence, corporate investment and firm performance: An Empirical Study Based on A share listed companies in China. Journal of Shanxi university finance and economics, 1, 116-124.
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Yuan, J. G, Cheng, C., & Hou, J. S. (2015). Enviromental uncertainty and firm technological innovation evidence from Chinese listed firms. Management Review, 27(10), 60-69.
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Zhu, P. F., Xiang, G. D., & Wang, Y. S. (2016). R&D spill-over effects: evidence from Chinese industrial sectors. Economic Research, 11, 44-55.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top