Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
RESEARCH PAPER
Instructional Design of Creating Creative and Imaginative Works
1
National Formosa University, Yunlin, TAIWAN
2
TransWorld University, Yunlin, TAIWAN
Online publication date: 2018-01-27
Publication date: 2018-01-27
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(4):1509-1517
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to explore instructional design experiment regarding the different performances and influential factors of reflection and assessment on creating creative and imaginative works. This research adopted the quasi-experimental research method with non-equivalent pretest-posttest designs. The 218 college students as samples were randomly assigned into the experimental groups and control groups. The Questionnaire of Creative Thinking (QCT) and Works Analysis Form (WAF) were conducted as assessments in this research. The conclusions of the findings are as followings: 1. the students’ performances of creating creative and imaginative works were better after receiving the creative instructional design of Lotus Blossom Technique (LBT). 2. more excellent imaginative works can be produced, if the students can be provided with specific creating steps. The college students’ creativity performances can be promoted with offerings of creativity courses and methodology by the qualified college teachers with instructional design.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Awang, H., & Ramly, I. (2013). Creative thinking skill approach through problem-based learning: pedagogy and practice in the engineering classroom, International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 18-23.
2.
Cropley, D. H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Measuring functional creativity: empirical validation of the Creative Solution Diagnosis Scale (CSDS). Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 119-137. doi:10.1002/jocb.9.
3.
Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2010). Recognizing and fostering creativity in technological design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 345-358. doi:10.1007/s10798-009-9089-5.
4.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
6.
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1990). The systematic design of instruction (3rd Ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
7.
Doppelt, Y. (2009). Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(1), 55-65. doi:10.1007/s10798-006-9008-y.
8.
Eckhoff, A., & Urbach, J. (2008). Understanding imaginative thinking during childhood: sociocultural conceptions of creativity and imaginative thought. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(2), 179-185. doi:10.1007/s10643-008-0261-4.
9.
Gagn’e, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design. Tallahassee, Florida: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.
10.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
11.
Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature, Design Studies, 29, 160–180. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001.
12.
Hui, A. N. N., & Lau, S. (2010). Formulation of Policy and Strategy in Developing Creativity Education in Four Asian Chinese Societies: A Policy Analysis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44(4), 215-235. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01334.x.
13.
Keller, F. S., & Sherman, G. (1974). The Keller lan handbook. Menlo Park, CA: W. A. Benjamin, Inc.
14.
Kemp, J. E. (1985). The instructional design process. New York: Harper & Row, Pub, Inc.
15.
Lau, K. W., Ng, M. C. F., & Lee, P. Y. (2009). Rethinking the creativity training in design education: a study of creative-thinking tools for facilitating creativity development of design students. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 8(1), 71–84. doi:10.1386/adch.8.1.71_1.
16.
Law, L. C., & Wong, K. M. (1995). Implications and problems of constructivism for instructional design. Educational Journal, 23(2), 73-102.
17.
Markley, O. W. (1988). Using depth intuition in creative problem solving and strategic innovation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 22(2), 85-100. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1988.tb00670.x.
18.
Mayes, T. T. (1994). Hypermedia and cognitive tools. Retrieved from http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ctl/m....
19.
Merrill, D. M., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., & Pratt, J. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design, Educational Technology, Sep-Oct, pp.5-7.
20.
Michalko, M. (1998). Cracking creativity. The secrets of creative genius. Berkeley, California: Ten Speed Press.
21.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2001). Designing effective instruction (3rd Ed.). New York: John Wiley.
22.
Peterson, R. E. (2002). Establishing the creative environment in technology education. Technology Teacher, 61(4), 7-10.
23.
Richey, R. C. (1986). The theoretical and conceptual bases of instructional design. London: Kogan Page, Ltd.
24.
Seels, B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, D.C.: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
27.
Shneiderman, B., Fischer, G., Czerwinski, M., Myers, B., & Resnick, M. (2005). Creativity support tools. Retrieved from http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/CST....
28.
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum: A propulsion model of kinds of creative contributions. New York: Psychology Press.
29.
Tennyson, R. D. (1997). A system dynamics approach to instructional systems development. In R. D. Tennyson, F. Schott, N. Seel, & S. Dijkstra (Eds.), Instructional design: International perspective: Volume 1: Theory, research, and models. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
30.
Tennyson, R. D., & Foshay, R. W. (2000). Instructional systems development, In S. Tobias, H. F. O’Neil (Eds), Handbook on training. Jr. New York, NY: Macmillan.
31.
Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Dorval, K. B. (2003). Creative problem solving (CPS Version 6.1TM) A contemporary framework for managing change, Buffalo, NY.
32.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and Creativity in Childhood. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42(1), 7-97.
33.
Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can Traditional Divergent Thinking Tests Be Trusted in Measuring and Predicting Real-World Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 24–37. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.545713.
34.
Zhang, Y. Y. (2011). Imagination of Scientific Invention, Report from National Science Council of Taiwan, NSC 98-2511-S-110-008-MY2.
35.
Zimmerman, E. (2009). Reconceptualizing the Role of Creativity in Art Education Theory and Practice. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 50(4), 382-399.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
