RESEARCH PAPER
Integrating technology pedagogy and content knowledge in Qatar’s preparatory and secondary schools: The perceptions and practices of STEM teachers
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Doha for Science and Technology, Doha, QATAR
 
2
Qatar University, Doha, QATAR
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-04-12
 
 
Publication date: 2023-06-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2023;19(6):em2271
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This paper is part of a project on enhancing STEM teaching through teachers’ professional development (TPD). The aim is to explore K-12 science and mathematics teachers’ views and practices about implementing STEM through technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) model in Qatar and identify their challenges. The objective is to develop a TPD program using project-based learning pedagogical intervention to support K-12 science and mathematics teachers and to train them on how to implement PBL in their teaching practices. 245 STEM teachers from 16 preparatory and secondary schools, representing an equal number of males and females, responded to a STEM-TPACK survey on perceptions of and practices in teaching STEM subjects. One hundred thirty-seven preparatory (grades 7-9) and 108 secondary school teachers (grades10-11). Generally, there are no significant differences between the different dual groups in understanding STEM, TPACK, and embedding technology, with few exceptions in some aspects. This reflects a high consistency in teaching, pedagogy, and learning environments among these groups (gender, teaching level, and STEM subjects taught). Preparatory school teachers show more variations in all elements of TPACK than secondary school teachers, as reflected by values of standard errors of the mean (SEM). Male teachers show slightly more understanding of elements of TPACK and have somewhat higher means than female teachers. SEM for female teachers is slightly higher, indicating more variation among female teachers than male teachers. However, the difference is also insignificant, as characterized by the small effect sizes ranging from 0.13 to 0.31, small t-test values, and high p-values.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Al Said, R. S., Du, X., Alkhatib, H., Romanowski, M. H., & Barham, A. I.(2019). Math teachers’ beliefs, practices, and belief change in implementing problem-based learning in Qatari primary governmental schools. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(5), em1710. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
2.
Al Salami, M. K., Makela, C. J., & de Miranda, M. A. (2017). Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 63-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798....
 
3.
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. (eds.). (2013). STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. Sense Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
 
4.
Cevik, M. (2018). Impacts of the project-based (PBL) science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education on vocational high school students’ academic achievement and career interests. PEGEM Journal of Education and Instruction, 8(2), 281-306. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegeg....
 
5.
Chai, C. S. (2018). Teacher professional development for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A review from the perspectives of technological pedagogical content (TPACK). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28, 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299....
 
6.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.....
 
7.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.3....
 
8.
El-Deghaidy, H., & Mansour, N. (2015). Science teachers’ perceptions of STEM education: Possibilities and challenges. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 51-54. http://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.1....
 
9.
El-Emadi, A. A., Said, Z., & Friesen, H. L. (2019). Teaching style differences between male and female science teachers in Qatari schools: Possible impact on student achievement. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), em1800. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
10.
Fore, G. A., Feldhaus, C. R., Sorge, B. H., Agarwal, M., & Varahramyan, K. (2015). Learning at the nano-level: Accounting for complexity in internalizing secondary STEM teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate....
 
11.
Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089-1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
12.
Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related Instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43, 211-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/153915....
 
13.
Holmes, K., Mackenzie, E., Berger, N., &. Walker, M. (2021). Linking K-12 STEM pedagogy to local contexts: A scoping review of benefits and limitations. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.....
 
14.
IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. (2021). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows version 28.0. IBM Corp. https://www.ibm.com/products/s....
 
15.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 108, 1017-1054.
 
16.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
 
17.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/t....
 
18.
Odell, M. R., Kennedy, T. J., & Stocks, E. (2019). The impact of PBL as a STEM school reform model. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5....
 
19.
OECD. (2013). Innovative learning environments. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/978926....
 
20.
OECD. (2016). Innovating education and educating for innovation: The power of digital technologies and skills. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/978926....
 
21.
OECD. (2019). Performance of students in Qatar in PISA-18, Qatar country report. OECD. https://gpseducation.oecd.org/....
 
22.
Said, Z. (2016). Science education reform in Qatar: Progress and challenges. EURASIA Journal of Math, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 2253-2265. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
23.
Said, Z., Al-Emadi, A. A., Friesen, H. L., & Adam, E. (2019b). Assessing the science interest, attitude, and self-efficacy of Qatari students at the preparatory, secondary, and university levels. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1618. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
24.
Said, Z., Summers, R., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Wang, S. (2016). Attitudes toward science among grades 3 through 12 Arab students in Qatar: Findings from a cross-sectional national study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(4), 621-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
25.
Sang, G., Tondeur, J. Chai, C. S., & Dong, Y. (2016) Validation and profile of Chinese pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/135986....
 
26.
Shank, D. B., & Cotten, S. R. (2014). Does technology empower urban youth? The relationship of technology use to self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 70, 184-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
27.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top