RESEARCH PAPER
Learning first-year mathematics fully online: Were students prepared, how did they respond?
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, SOUTH AFRICA
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-04-12
 
 
Publication date: 2023-06-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2023;19(6):em2272
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This paper reports on empirical results from a study that investigated first-year mathematics students’ preparedness for, and response to, online learning. With the appearance of COVID-19 in 2020, lecturers were forced to make sudden changes to the established face-to-face learning environments, and students were expected to adapt to these changes. The idea of a blended learning environment is not new, and students globally have demanded flexibility in mathematics learning environments for some time. However, the idea of a sudden change in environments, particularly to fully online, was new to most lecturers and students. Key aspects in an online environment are students’ ability to self-regulate their learning, and the availability and accessibility of technological resources. Quantitative data from the self-developed questionnaire were collected early in 2021, at a public university in South Africa, from a large sample over several modules. Results indicate students are partially prepared for learning fully online, with significant effect on performance.
REFERENCES (38)
1.
Acosta-Gonzaga, E., & Walet, N. R. (2017). The role of attitudinal factors in mathematical on-line assessments: A study of undergraduate STEM students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 710-726. https://doi.org/10.1080/026029....
 
2.
Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 18(1), 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/072943....
 
3.
Borba, M. C. (2021). The future of mathematics education since COVID-19: Humans-with-media or humans-with-non-living-things. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(1), 385-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
4.
Borba, M. C., & Villareal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, experimentation and visualization. Springer.
 
5.
Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S. & Sánchez-Aguilar, M. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 589-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
 
6.
Callaghan, R., Joubert, J., & Engelbrecht, J. (2022). Using enaction to evolve from pre-COVID to post-COVID pedagogy: A case study with South African mathematics teachers. ZDM Mathematics Education, 55, 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
 
7.
Chirinda, B., Ndlovu, M., & Spangenberg, E. (2021). Teaching mathematics during the COVID-19 lockdown in a context of historical disadvantage. Education Sciences, 11(4), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsc....
 
8.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
 
9.
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley and Sons.
 
10.
Drijvers, P., Kieran, C., & Mariotti, M.-A. (2009). Integrating technology into mathematics education: Theoretical perspectives. In C. Hoyles, & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain (pp. 89-132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-....
 
11.
Durandt, R., Herbst, S., & Seloane, M. (2022). Teaching and learning first-year engineering mathematics over a distance: A critical view over two consecutive years. Perspectives in Education, 40(1), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.18820/25195....
 
12.
Engelbrecht, J., Borba, M. C., & Kaiser, G. (2023). Will we ever teach mathematics again in the way we used to before the pandemic? ZDM Mathematics Education, 55, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
 
13.
Engelbrecht, J., Borba, M. C., Llinares, S., & Kaiser, G. (2020a). Will 2020 be remembered as the year in which education was changed? ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(5), 821-824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
 
14.
Engelbrecht, J., Llinares, S., & Borba, M. C. (2020b). Transformation of the mathematics classroom with the internet. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 825-841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
 
15.
Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of mendelian inheritance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 52(2), 399-433. https://doi.org/10.1017/S00804....
 
16.
Han, H. (2020). How to make the switch to online teaching more effective. University World News. https://www.universityworldnew....
 
17.
Healy, L., Jahn, A. P., & Frant, J. B. (2010). Digital technologies and the challenge of constructing an inclusive school mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42(3), 393-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
 
18.
Kamanetz, A. (2020). ‘Panic-gogy’: Teaching online classes during the coronavirus pandemic. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2020/03/19....
 
19.
Kruskal, W. H. & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/016214....
 
20.
Laborde, C. (2007) The role and uses of technologies in mathematics classrooms: Between challenge and modus vivendi. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7(1), 68-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/149261....
 
21.
Laurillard, D. (2013). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. Routledge.
 
22.
Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In I. Olkin, S. G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. G. Madow, & H. B. Mann (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold hoteling (pp. 278-292). Stanford University Press.
 
23.
Louw, A. (2021). Large faculty support for teaching online. In Teaching innovation for the 21st century: A collection of UJ teaching and learning vignettes (pp. 1-3). University of Johannesburg.
 
24.
Mann, H. B. & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1....
 
25.
Parekh, A. (2021). Introduction. In Teaching innovation for the 21st century: A collection of UJ teaching and learning vignettes (pp. 1-3). University of Johannesburg.
 
26.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0....
 
27.
QA Report. (2020). QA report on the transition to remote teaching and learning. Division for Academic Planning, Quality Promotion and Academic Staff Development. https://www.uj.ac.
 
28.
Quinn, D., & Aaräo, J. (2020). Blended learning in first year engineering mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 15(5), 927-941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
 
29.
Reddy, V., Winnaar, L., Juan, A., Arends, F., Harvey, J., Hannan, S., Namome, C., Sekhejane, P., & Zulu, N. (2020). TIMSS 2019: Highlights of South African grade 9 results in mathematics and science. Achievement and achievement gaps. Department of Basic Education. https://www.timss-sa.org/wp-co....
 
30.
Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2(6), 110-114. https://doi.org/10.2307/300201....
 
31.
Šidàk, Z. (1967). Rectangular confidence region for the means of multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(318), 626-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/016214....
 
32.
StataCorp. (2021). Stata statistical software: Release 17. StataCorp LLC. https://www.stata.com/support/....
 
33.
Tanur, J. M. (1983). Methods for large-scale surveys and experiments. Sociological Methodology, 14, 1-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/270902.
 
34.
Trenholm, S., Alcock, L., & Robinson, C. (2016). Brief report: The instructor experience of fully online tertiary mathematics: A challenge and an opportunity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(2), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresem....
 
35.
Trenholm, S., Alcock, L., & Robinson, C. L. (2012). Mathematics lecturing in the digital age. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(6), 703-716. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
 
36.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1997). Towards an understanding of individual acts of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/072943....
 
37.
Watkins, D., & Hattie, J. (1985). A longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications, 4(2), 127-141.
 
38.
Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80-83. https://doi.org/10.2307/300196....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top