RESEARCH PAPER
Learning to Teach at Heterogeneous and Diverse Chemistry Classes - Methods for University Chemistry Teacher Training Courses
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Bremen, Bremen, GERMANY
 
2
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FINLAND
 
3
Padagogische Hochschule Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, GERMANY
 
 
Publication date: 2018-07-12
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(10):em1593
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Circumstances in school change and teachers constantly face different obstacles. One of these includes dealing with heterogeneity and diversity in chemistry classes. Future chemistry teachers need to be aware of the differences in their classrooms. They must be prepared to diagnose and handle differences in order to obtain the best possible learning outcomes for their students. The present paper presents a cooperative project, which develops and evaluates teacher training modules at the University of Bremen (Germany) and the University of Helsinki (Finland). The seminars are based on a 3-step model which will be described as well. This model focuses on the initial sensitization of student teachers for heterogeneous chemistry classes (first step) and qualifying future teachers to diagnose (second step) and deal with heterogeneity and diversity in chemistry classroom (third step). Examples taken from the courses at both universities will be presented and preliminary evaluation results are given and discussed. First successes of the three steps of qualifying student teachers are recognizable in both countries. The courses in both countries show a short section from the teachers training program for the Bachelor and Master degree. All students attend different school in an internship after or during the courses.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Abels, S., & Markic, S. (Eds.). (2016). Science Education towards inclusion. New York: Nova.
 
2.
Aksela, M. (2010). Evidence-based teacher education: becoming a lifelong research-oriented chemistry teacher? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1039/C00535....
 
3.
Calderhead, J. (2011). Contribution of research on teachers thinking to the professional development. In C. Day, J. Calderhead, & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Research on teacher thinking (pp. 11–18). New York: Routledge.
 
4.
Campbell, P. B. (1996). How would I handle that? Using vignettes to promote good math and science education. New York: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED4131....
 
5.
Eilks, I., & Ralle, B. (2002). Participatory Action Research. In B. Ralle, & I. Eilks (Eds.), Research in chemical Education – What does it mean? Proceedings of the 16th Symposium on Chemical Education at the University of Dortmund, 22-24 May 2002 (pp. 87-98). Aachen: Shaker.
 
6.
European Commission (Eds.). (2016). Structural indicators on achievement in basic skills in Europe – 2016. Eurydice report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/f....
 
7.
Haq, F. S., & Mundia, L. (2012). Comparison on Brunei preservice student teachers´ attitudes to inclusive education and specific disabilities: Implications for teacher education. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(5), 366-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/002206....
 
8.
Heidinger, C., Abels, S., Plotz, T., & Koliander, B. (2018). Inclusion and chemistry teaching – deliberating conflicting demands. Retrieved on 07.06.2018 from https://keynote.conference-ser....
 
9.
Jäger, R. S. (2009). Diagnostische Kompetenz und Urteilsbildung als Element von Lehrprofessionalität. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, K. Beck, D. Sembill, & R. Mulder, (Eds.), Lehrprofessionalität – Bedingungen, Genese, Wirkung und ihre Messung [professional teachers – conditions, influences and assessment] (pp. 105–116). Weinheim: Beltz.
 
10.
Klug, J., Bruder, S., Kelava, A., Spiel, C., & Schmitz, B. (2013), Diagnostic competence of teachers: A process model that accounts for diagnosing learning behaviour tested by means of a case scenario, Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate....
 
11.
Kousa, P., Kavonius, R., & Aksela, M. (2018). Low-achieving students´ attitudes towards chemistry and it´s teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00....
 
12.
Krell, G., Riedmüller, B., Sieben, B., & Vinz, D. (2007). Einleitung – Diversity studies als integrierende Forschungseinrichtung. In G. Krell, B. Riedmüller, B. Sieben, & D. Vinz (Eds.), Diversity studies, Grundlagen und disziplinäre Ansätze [diversity studies, basics and disciplinary approaches] (pp. 7-16). Frankfurt: Campus.
 
13.
Lärvinen, T., & Jahnukainen, M. (2008). Koulutus, polarisaatio ja tasa-arvo: hyvä- ja huono-osaistuminen perus- ja keskiasteen koulutuksessa. In M. Autio, K. Eräranta, & S. Myllyniemi (Eds.), Nuoret ja polarisaatio: nuorten elinolot vuosikirja [Polarized youth? The young people’s living conditions’ yearbooks] (pp. 72–81). Helsinki: Council of youth affairs, The youth research network and Finland’s national research and development centre for Welfare and Health.
 
14.
Lynch, S. (2001). “Science for all” is not equal to “one size fits all”: linguistic and cultural diversity and science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 622-627. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10....
 
15.
Markic, S. (2015). Chemistry teachers’ attitudes and needs when dealing with linguistic heterogeneity in the classroom. In M. Kahveci, & M. K. Orgill (Eds), Affective dimensions in chemistry education (pp. 279–296). Heidelberg: Springer.
 
16.
Markic, S. (2018). Learning language and intercultural understanding in science classes in Germany. In K.-S. Tang, & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education (pp. 63-78). Heidelberg: Springer.
 
17.
Markic, S., Broggy, J., & Childs, P. (2013). How to deal with linguistic issues in chemistry classes. In I. Eilks, & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Teaching Chemistry - A Studybook (pp. 127-152). Rotterdam: Sense.
 
18.
Mittler, P. (2015). Working towards inclusive education: social Context. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: David Fulton Publishers.
 
19.
Mumba, F., Banda, A., & Chabalengula, V. M. (2015). Chemistry teachers´ perceived benefits and challenges of inquiry-based instruction in inclusive chemistry classrooms. Science Education International, 26(2), 180-194.
 
20.
Ohle, A., & McElvany, N. (2015). Teachers´ diagnostic competences and their practical relevance, special issue editorial, Journal for educational Research Online, 7(2), 5-10.
 
21.
Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
 
22.
Salmela-Aro, K., Read, S., Minkkinen, J., Kinnunen, M., & Rimpelä, A. (2017). Immigrant status, gender, and school burnout in Finnish lower secondary school students: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502....
 
23.
Schlueter, A.-K., & Melle, I. (2018).Professionalization of future chemistry teachers für teaching in inclusive classes. eProceeding of Esera 2017 conference, Dublin City university, Part 13. Pre-service science teacher education.
 
24.
Sliwka, A., (2010). From homogeneity to diversity in German education. In OECD (Ed.), Educating teachers for diversity: Meeting the challenge (pp. 205–217). Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/978926....
 
25.
Stellbrink, M. (2012). Inklusion als Herausforderung für die Entwicklung von Unterricht, Schule und Lehrerbildung [Inclusion as a challenge for development of Lesson, schooll and teacher education]. In S. Fürstenau (Ed.), Interkulturelle Pädagogik und Sprachliche Bildung [intercultural and language education]. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
26.
Subban, P., & Sharma, U. (2006). Primary school teachers’ perceptions of inclusive education in Victoria. International Journal of Special Education, 2(1), 42-52.
 
27.
Taber, K. (2005). Developing teachers as a learning doctor. Teacher Development, 9(2), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/136645....
 
28.
Tolsdorf, Y., & Markic, S. (2016). Language in science classrooms: diagnosing students´ linguistic skills. In S. Abels, & S. Markic (Eds.), Science education towards inclusion (pp. 23-42). New York: Nova.
 
29.
Tolsdorf, Y., & Markic, S. (2017). Exploring chemistry student teachers` diagnostic competence – a qualitative cross-level study. Education Sciences, 7(86), 86-100. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsc....
 
30.
Tolsdorf, Y., & Markic, S. (2018). Development of an instrument and evaluation pattern for the analysis of chemistry student teachers diagnostic competence. International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 9(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijpce....
 
31.
Tolsdorf, Y., & Markic, S. (accepted). Participatory Action research in university chemistry teacher training. Centre for Educational Policy Studies Journal.
 
32.
Tolsdorf, Y., & Markic, S. (in review). Exploring student teachers´ knowledge about diagnostics in science lessons – a longitudinal study.
 
33.
Van Driel, J. H., de Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of pre-service chemistry teachers’ PCK. Science Teacher Education, 86(4), 572-590. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10....
 
34.
Vitoriano, F. A., Teles, V. L. G., Rizzatti, I. M., & Pesssoa de Lima, R. C. (2016). Promoting inclusice chemisctry teaching by developing an accessible thermometer for students with visual disabilities. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 2046-2051. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
 
35.
Weinert, F. E. (1997). Notwendige Methodenvielfalt [Necessary a variety of methods]. Friedrich Jahresheft, 15, 50-52.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top