RESEARCH PAPER
Mathematical reasoning of prospective mathematics teachers in solving problems based on working memory capacity differences
More details
Hide details
1
Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jawa Timur, INDONESIA
2
Mathematics Education, Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja, Tana Toraja, INDONESIA
3
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Publication date: 2022-11-25
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2022;18(12):em2193
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study aims to investigate algorithmic reasoning and creative reasoning of prospective
mathematics teachers in solving problems. This research is a qualitative research. The research
subjects are prospective mathematics teachers with high working memory capacity (HWMC) and
low working memory capacity (LWMC). Based on the results on algorithmic reasoning, it is known
that for subjects with HWMC using algorithms to solve the given problems. While subjects with
LWMC using sum and multiplication rules to solve the given problems. On creative mathematical
reasoning it is known that for subjects with HWMC using a novel strategy, providing predictive
and verification reasons for the selection of strategies, and providing convincing reasons
accordance with the intrinsic mathematical properties. While subjects with low memory capacity
had difficulty providing a verification reason and the reason that the way of solving was in
accordance with the intrinsic mathematical properties.
REFERENCES (37)
1.
Aineamani, B. (2018). How learners communicate their mathematics reasoning in mathematics discourse. In J. Moschkovich, D. Wagner, A. Bose, J. Rodrigues Mendes, & M. Schütte (Eds.), Language and communication in mathematics education (pp. 65-74). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
2.
Anjariyah, D., Juniati, D., & Eko, T. Y. (2022). How does working memory capacity affect students’ mathematical problem solving? European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1427-1439.
https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-je....
4.
Bergqvist, E. (2007). Types of reasoning required in university exams in mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(4), 348-370.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
5.
Boesen, J., Lithner, J., & Palm, T. (2010). The relation between types of assessment tasks and the mathematical reasoning students use. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 89-105.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
6.
de Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 291(5509), 1803-1806.
https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc....
7.
de Ron, A., Christiansen, I., & Skog, K. (2022). Configuring the landscape of research on problem-solving in mathematics teacher education. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(4), em0712.
https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme....
8.
Dröse, J., Prediger, S., Neugebauer, P., Delucchi Danhier, R., & Mertins, B. (2021). Investigating students’ processes of noticing and interpreting syntactic language features in word problem solving through eye-tracking. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(1), em0625.
https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme....
9.
Fan, L., & Bokhove, C. (2014). Rethinking the role of algorithms in school mathematics: A conceptual model with focus on cognitive development. ZDM, 46(3), 481-492.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
10.
Fatmanissa, N., Kusnandi, K., & Usdiyana, D. (2020). Effect of schema use in solving word problems: Emphasis on linguistic difficulties. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 1(2), ep20006.
https://doi.org/10.30935/conma....
11.
Fyfe, E. R., Matz, L. E., Hunt, K. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2019). Mathematical thinking in children with developmental language disorder: The roles of pattern skills and verbal working memory. Journal of Communication Disorders, 77, 17-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom....
12.
Habtamu, S. B., Mulugeta, A. A., & Mulugeta, W. G. (2022). The effect of cooperative problem-solving method on students’ motivation towards learning algebra. Pedagogical Research, 7(2), em0123.
https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11....
13.
Hershkowitz, R., Tabach, M., & Dreyfus, T. (2016). Creative reasoning and shifts of knowledge in the mathematics classroom. ZDM, 49(1), 25-36.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
14.
Hokor, E. K., Apawu, J., Owusu-Ansah, N. A., & Agormor, S. (2022). Preservice teachers’ misconceptions in solving probabilistic problems. Pedagogical Research, 7(1), em0112.
https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11....
15.
Jonsson, B., Kulaksiz, Y. C., & Lithner, J. (2016). Creative and algorithmic mathematical reasoning: Effects of transfer-appropriate processing and effortful struggle. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(8), 1206-1225.
https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
16.
Jonsson, B., Norqvist, M., Liljekvist, Y., & Lithner, J. (2014). Learning mathematics through algorithmic and creative reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36, 20-32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
17.
Julius, E. (2022). The relationship between self-concept and problem-solving skills on students’ attitude towards solving algebraic problems. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 3(2), ep22020.
https://doi.org/10.30935/conma....
18.
Juniati, D., & Budayasa, I. K. (2020). Working memory capacity and mathematics anxiety of mathematics students and its effect on mathematics achievement. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 279-291.
https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys....
19.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 169-183.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3....
20.
Langi, E. L., Juniati, D., & Abadi. (2021). Understanding definite integral concepts of prospective teachers through actions and processes based on gender difference. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1), 012026.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
21.
Lester, F. K., & Cai, J. (2016). Can mathematical problem solving be taught? Preliminary answers from 30 years of research. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems (pp. 117-135). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
22.
Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255-276.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
23.
Lithner, J. (2015). Learning mathematics by creative or imitative reasoning. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 487-506). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
24.
Muzaini, M., Juniati, D., & Siswono, T. Y. (2019). Exploration of student’s quantitative reasoning in solving mathematical problem: Case study of field-dependent cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 032093.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
25.
Norqvist, M. (2017). The effect of explanations on mathematical reasoning tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(1), 15-30.
https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
26.
Norqvist, M., Jonsson, B., Lithner, J., Qwillbard, T., & Holm, L. (2019). Investigating algorithmic and creative reasoning strategies by eye tracking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55, 100701.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
27.
Øystein, H. P. (2011). What characterizes high achieving students’ mathematical reasoning? In B. Sriraman, & K. H. Lee (Eds.), The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics (pp. 193-215). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
28.
Palengka, I., Juniati, D., & Abadi. (2019). Creative mathematical reasoning of prospective teachers in solving problems reviewed based on working memory capacity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1), 012055.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
29.
Palengka, I., Juniati, D., & Abadi. (2021). Mathematical reasoning structure of junior high school students in solving problems based on their working memory capacity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1), 012023.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
30.
Portaankorva-Koivisto, P. M., Laine, A. T., & Ahtee, M. (2021). Two primary teachers developing their teaching problem-solving during three-year in-service training. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(1), em0624.
https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme....
31.
Ramdani, R., Syamsuddin, A., & Sirajuddin, S. (2019). Development of mathematical module-problem solving approach to train student’s reflective thinking. Pedagogical Research, 4(4), em0040.
https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/58....
32.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). What makes for powerful classrooms, and how can we support teachers in creating them? A story of research and practice productively intertwined. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 404-412.
https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
33.
Sidenvall, J., Lithner, J., & Jäder, J. (2014). Students’ reasoning in mathematics textbook task-solving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(4), 533-552.
https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
34.
Sumpter, L. (2015). Investigating upper secondary school teachers’ conceptions: Is mathematical reasoning considered gendered? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(S2), 347-362.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
35.
Swanson, H. L. (2017). Verbal and visual-spatial working memory: What develops over a life span? Developmental Psychology, 53(5), 971-995.
https://doi.org/10.1037/dev000....
36.
Wiley, J., & Jarosz, A. F. (2012). How working memory capacity affects problem solving. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 185-227). Academic Press.
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0....
37.
Wirebring, L. K., Lithner, J., Jonsson, B., Liljekvist, Y., Norqvist, M., & Nyberg, L. (2015). Learning mathematics without a suggested solution method: Durable effects on performance and brain activity. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4(1-2), 6-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine....