Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
RESEARCH PAPER
Opportunity to learn about optimization problems provided by undergraduate calculus textbooks: A case study
1
Department of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Miami University, Middletown, OH, USA
Online publication date: 2023-08-11
Publication date: 2023-10-01
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2023;19(10):em2335
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study investigated opportunities to learn about optimization problems provided by undergraduate calculus textbooks. To accomplish this, we analyzed examples and practice problems from two calculus textbooks widely used in the teaching of calculus in the United States. Findings of this study indicate that a majority of the problems in both textbooks lack realistic and essential contexts, have matching or missing information, and require a low cognitive demand to solve. Setting up objective functions is either not necessary or it is straightforward for most problems in the two textbooks. In addition, both textbooks provide ample opportunities to interpret critical numbers and extrema in context. Overall, findings of this study suggest the existence of a relationship between known students’ difficulties with solving optimization problems and the opportunities to learn about optimization problems provided by calculus textbooks. Implications for several stakeholders, including calculus textbook authors and calculus instructors are discussed.
REFERENCES (39)
1.
Aguinis, H., & Solarino, A. M. (2019). Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1291-1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.30....
2.
Alajmi, A. H. (2012). How do elementary textbooks address fractions? A review of mathematics textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
3.
Begle, E. G. (1973). Some lessons learned by SMSG. Mathematics Teacher, 66(3), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.66.....
4.
Borgen, K. L., & Manu, S. S. (2002). What do students really understand? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(2), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-....
5.
Brijlall, D., & Ndlovu, Z. (2013). High school learners’ mental construction during solving optimization problems in calculus: A South African case study. South African Journal of Education, 33(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.....
6.
Carroll, J. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146....
7.
Chang, B. L., Cromley, J. G., & Tran, N. (2016). Coordinating multiple representations in a reform calculus textbook. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(8), 1475-1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
8.
Charalambous, C. Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H. Y., & Mesa, V. (2010). A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 117-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/109860....
9.
de Lange, J. (1995). Assessment: No change without problems. In T. A. Romberg (Ed.), Reform in school mathematics (pp. 87-172). SUNY Press.
10.
Dole, S., & Shield, M. J. (2008). The capacity of two Australian eighth-grade textbooks for promoting proportional reasoning. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/147948....
11.
Dominguez, A. (2010). Single solution, multiple perspectives. In R. Lesh, P L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA 13 (pp. 223-233). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-....
12.
Floden, R. E. (2002). The measurement of opportunity to learn. In A. C. Porter, & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 231-266). National Academy Press.
13.
Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1-3), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003....
14.
Haghjoo, S., Radmehr, F., & Reyhani, E. (2023). Analyzing the written discourse in calculus textbooks over 42 years: The case of primary objects, concrete discursive objects, and a realization tree of the derivative at a point. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112(1), 73-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
15.
Hughes-Hallett, D., Lock, P. F., Gleason, A. M., Flath, D.E., Gleason, A. M., Luzano, G. I., Rhea, K., Connally, E., McCallum, W. G., Sahin, A., Kalaycioglu, S., Osgood, B. G., Spiegler, A. H., Lahme, B., Patterson, C. L., Tecosky-Feldman, J., Lomen, D. O., Quinney, D., Tucker, T. W., Lovelock, D., & Wooten, A. D. (2018). Applied calculus. Wiley.
16.
Husen, T. (Ed.). (1967). International study of achievement in mathematics: A comparison of twelve countries. John Wiley & Sons.
17.
Jones, D. L., & Tarr, J. E. (2007). An examination of the levels of cognitive demand required by probability tasks in middle grades mathematics textbooks. Statistics Education Research Journal, 6(2), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.....
18.
Kolovou, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Bakker, A. (2009). Non-routine problem solving tasks in primary school mathematics textbooks–a needle in a haystack. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8(2), 31-68.
19.
LaRue, R., & Infante, N. E. (2015). Optimization in first semester calculus: A look at a classic problem. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(7), 1021-1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
20.
Lithner, J. (2004). Mathematical reasoning in calculus textbook exercises. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(4), 405-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
21.
Maass, K. (2007). Modelling tasks for low achieving students–first results of an empirical study. In D. Pitta Pantazi, & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2120-2129).
22.
Maass, K. (2010). Classification scheme for modelling tasks. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik [Journal for Mathematics Didactics], 31(2), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/105119....
23.
Mesa, V., Suh, H., Blake, T., & Whittemore, T. (2012). Examples in college algebra textbooks: Opportunities for students’ learning. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 23(1), 76-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/105119....
24.
Mkhatshwa, T. (2019). Students’ quantitative reasoning about an absolute extrema optimization problem in a profit maximization context. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(8), 1105-1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
25.
Mkhatshwa, T. (2022a). A study of calculus students’ difficulties, approaches, and ability to solve multivariable optimization problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2987-3014. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
26.
Mkhatshwa, T. (2022b). Quantitative and covariational reasoning opportunities provided by calculus textbooks: The case of the derivative. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
27.
Nagle, C., Moore-Russo, D., Viglietti, J., & Martin, K. (2013). Calculus students’ and instructors’ conceptualizations of slope: A comparison across academic levels. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(6), 1491-1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
28.
Pickle, M. C. C. (2012), Statistical content in middle grades mathematics textbooks [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of South Florida.
29.
Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., & Chavez, O. (2004). Why mathematics textbooks matter. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 61-66.
30.
Stacey, K., & Vincent, J. (2009). Modes of reasoning in explanations in Australian eighth-grade mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(3), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
32.
Stylianides, G. J. (2009). Reasoning-and-proving in school mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(4), 258-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/109860....
33.
Swanagan, B. S. (2012). The impact of students’ understanding of derivatives on their performance while solving optimization problems [Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia].
34.
Thompson, D. R., Senk, S. L., & Johnson, G. J. (2012). Opportunities to learn reasoning and proof in high school mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 253-295. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresem....
35.
Törnroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stue....
36.
Tyne, J. G. (2016). Calculus students’ reasoning about slope and derivative as rates of change [Unpublished master’s thesis]. The University of Maine.
37.
van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2005). The role of contexts in assessment problems in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(2), 2-9.
38.
White, P., & Mitchelmore, M. (1996). Conceptual knowledge in introductory calculus. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/749199.
39.
Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Opportunity-to-learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1), 41-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
