Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
Problem Solving and Emotional
Education in Initial Primary
Teacher Education
1
Extremadura University, Badajoz, SPAIN
Publication date: 2011-12-21
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2011;7(4):281-292
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Our work is based on two premises. The first is that affective factors (beliefs, attitudes,
and emotions) influence teaching and learning mathematics, and problem solving in
particular. The second is that initial teacher education is an important element in the
process of improving overall educational practice. On this basis, our research group has
been working on evaluating the influence of affect in mathematics problem solving for
prospective teachers, and on designing and implementing a program of metacognitive
intervention that integrates cognitive and affective factors. The present communication
describes our research in this line.
REFERENCES (58)
1.
Amato, S.A. (2004). Improving student teachers' attitudes to mathematics. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 25-32.
2.
Báez, A. (2007). El autoconcepto matemático y las creencias del alumnado: su relación con el logro de aprendizaje, un estudio exploratorio, descriptivo e interpretativo en la ESO (Tesis doctoral no publicada), Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, España.
3.
Blanco, L. J. (2004). Problem solving and the initial practical and theoretical education of teachers in Spain. Mathematics Teacher Education & Development, 6, 37-48.
4.
Blanco, L.J. & Otano, P. (1999). Learning to teach sciences: problem solving as a context for learning. In Babdiera, M.; Caravita, S.; Torracca, E. & Vicentini, M. (Eds.), Research in Science Education in Europe (pp. 291-298).Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Pub.
5.
Blanco, L. J, Guerrero, E., Caballero, A., Brígido, M., & Mellado, V. (2010). The affective dimension of learning and teaching mathematics and science. En M. P. Caltone (Ed.), Handbook of Lifelong Learning Developments (pp. 265-287). EE.UU: Nova Science Publishers Hardcover.
6.
Bransford, J. & Stein, B. (1987). The IDEAL problem solver: a guide for improving thinking, learning and creativity. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
7.
Caballero, A. (2008). El Dominio Afectivo en las Matemáticas de los estudiantes para Maestro de la Facultad de Educación de la Universidad de Extremadura (Trabajo de investigación para la obtención del Diploma de Estudios Avanzados no publicado). Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, España..
8.
Caballero, A., Blanco, L. J. Y Guerrero, E. (2010). Las TIC como instrumento de recogida de información en investigación educativa. Conect@2 Revista Digital de Investigación Educativa, 1 (2), 195-209.
9.
Caballero, A., Blanco, L.J., Guerrero, E. & Brígido, M. (2009). ICT as an information gathering tool in education research. In A. Méndez-Vilas, A. Solano, J.A. Mesa, & J. Mesa, (Eds.), Research, Reflections and Innovations in Integrating ICT in Education, 2 (pp. 750-753). Badajoz, Spain: FORMATEX.
10.
Caballero, A., Guerrero, E. & Blanco, L.J. (2008) Descripción del dominio afectivo en las Matemáticas de los estudiantes para Maestro de la Universidad de Extremadura. Paradigma, 29 (2), 157-171.
11.
Caballero, A., Guerrero, E., Blanco L.J. & Piedehierro, A. (2009). Resolución de problemas de Matemáticas y Control Emocional. Investigación en Educación Matemática, 13, 151-160.
12.
Castro, E. (2008). Resolución de Problemas. Ideas, tendencias e influencias en España. Investigación en Educación Matemática, 12, 113-140.
13.
Chapman, O. (2000). Mathematics teachers' beliefs about problem solving and teaching problem solving. In Contreras, L.C. & Carrillo, J. (Eds.), Resolución de problemas en los albores del siglo XXI: una visión internacional desde múltiples perspectivas y niveles ducativos (pp. 181-206). Huelva: Hergué.
14.
Charles, R. & Lester, F. (1982). Teaching problem solving. What, Why, How. Palo Alto: Dale Seymour Pub.
15.
Córcoles, A.C. & Valls, J. (2006). Debates virtuales y concepciones de estudiantes para maestro sobre resolución de problemas. Zetetiké, 14 (25), 7-28.
16.
Furinghetti, F. & Morselli, F. (2009). Every unsuccessful problem solver in unsuccessful in his or her own way: affective and cognitive factors in proving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 71-90.
17.
Garofalo, J. (1989): Beliefs, responses and mathematics education: Observations from the back of the classroom». School Science and Mathematics, 89 (6), 451- 455.
18.
Gil, J. (1992-93). La metodología de investigación mediante grupos de discusión. Enseñanza, 10-11, 199-212.
19.
Gil, N.; Blanco, L.J. & Guerrero, E. (2006a). The affective domain in mathematics learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 1 (1), 16-32.
20.
Gil, N., Blanco, L.J. & Guerrero, E. (2006b). El papel de la afectividad en la resolución de problemas. Revista de Educación, 340, 551-569.
21.
Goezt, J. & Lecompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research. London: Academic Press Inc.
22.
Graczyk, P.A., Weissberg, R.P., Payton, J.W., Elias, M.J., Greenberg, M.T. & Zins, J.E. (2000). Criteria for evaluating the quality of school-based social and emotional learning programs. In R. Bar-On & J. Parker (Eds.), The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence. Theory, Development, Assessment, and Applicationa at Home, School, and in the Workplace (pp. 391-410). San Francisco: JosseyBass.
23.
Guerrero, E., Blanco, L. J., López, M., Caballero, A., Gil, N. & Espejo, E. (2009). La integración de la dimensión afectiva-emocional en el aprendizaje de las Matemáticas. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 21 (2), 207-216.
24.
Harskamp, E. & Suhre, C. (2007). Schoenfeld’s problem solving theory in a student controlled learning environment. Computers & Education, 49, 822–839.
25.
Hernández, J., Palarea, M.M. & Socas, M.M. (2001). Análisis de las concepciones, creencias y actitudes hacia las Matemáticas de los alumnos que comienzan la Diplomatura de Maestro. El papel de los materiales didácticos. In M. Socas, M. Camacho & A. Morales (Coords.), Formación del profesorado e investigación en educación matemática II (pp. 115-124). Tenerife: Universidad de la Laguna.
26.
Hoffman, B. & Spatariu, A. (2008). The influence of selfefficacy and metacognitive prompting on math problem-solving efficiency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 875–893.
27.
Irarte, C., Alonso, N. & Sobrino, A. (2006). Relaciones entre el desarrollo emocional y moral a tener en cuenta en el ámbito educativo: una propuesta de un programa de intervención. Investigación Psicoeducativa, 4, 43-64.
28.
Lederman, L.C. (1990). Assessing educational effectiveness: the focus group interview as a technique for data collection. Communication Education, 38, 117-127.
29.
Marshall, S. (1989). Affect in schema knowledge: Source and impact. In D. McLeod & V. Adams (Eds.), Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A New Perspective (pp. 245- 258). New York: Springer-Verlag.
30.
Mason, J., L., Burton & Stacey, K. (1982). Thinking mathematically. London: Addison-Wesley Pub.
31.
Mason, L. & Scrivani, L. (2004). Enhacing students’ mathematical beliefs; an intervention study. Learning and instruction, 14, 153-176.
32.
Mcleod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In Douglas A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 575-598), New York: Macmillan.
33.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. Berverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (2007). PISA 2006. Programa para la Evaluación Internacional de Alumnos de la OCDE. Informe español. Madrid: Secretaría General Técnica.
35.
Mtetwa, D. & Garofalo, J., (1989) Beliefs About Mathematics: An Overlooked Aspect of Student Difficulties. Intervention in School and Clinic, 24, 611-618.
36.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2005). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo.
37.
Económicos (2005). Informe PISA 2003. Aprender para el mundo de mañana. Madrid: Santillana.
38.
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (2003). The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills. Paris: OCDE.
39.
Ortega, T. & Cubillo, C. (2000). Influencia de un modelo didáctico en la opinión/actitud de los alumnos hacia las Matemáticas. RELIME, 3 (2), 189-206.
40.
Palenzuela, D.L., Prieto G., Barros, A.M. & Almeida, L.S. (1997). Una versión española de batería de escalas de expectativas generalizadas de control (BEEGC-20). Revista Portuguesa de Educaçao, 10 (1), 75-96.
41.
Peker, M. (2009). Pre-service teachers´ teaching anxiety about mathematics and their learning styles. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5 (4), 335-345.
42.
Pino, J. & Blanco, L.J. (2008). Análisis de los problemas de los libros de texto de Matemáticas para alumnos de 12 a 14 años de edad de España y de Chile en relación con los contenidos de proporcionalidad. Publicaciones, 38, 63- 88.
44.
Ponte, J.P. (1992). Concepções dos Professores de Matemática e Processos de Formação. In Brown, M.; Fernandes, D.; Matos, J.F. & Ponte, J.P. (Eds.), Educação Matemática (pp. 185-239). Lisboa: Instituto de Inovaçao Educacional.
46.
Richardson, F. C. & Woolfolk, R. L. (1980). Mathematics anxiety. In Sarason, I.G. (Ed.), Test Anxiety: Theory, Research and Application (pp. 271-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47.
Rodríguez, M. J. (2005). Aplicación de las TIC a la evaluación de alumnos universitarios. Revista electrónica Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información, 2005-6 (1). Retravied January 19, 2008, from http://www.usal.es/~teoriaeduc... _2/n6_02_art_rodriguez_conde.htm.
48.
Santos, M. (2008). La Resolución de Problemas Matemáticos: Avances y Perspectivas en la construcción de una agenda de investigación y práctica. Investigación en Educación Matemática, 12, 157-187.
49.
Sarabia, A. (2006 Las actitudes, las creencias y las emociones hacia las matemáticas: un estudio descriptivo en alumnos de segundo de la ESO (Tesis doctoral no publicada). Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, España.
50.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving. Orlando: Academic Press Inc.
51.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992 Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: Macmillan.
52.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). Problem solving in the United States, 1970–2008: research and theory, practice and politics. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39 (5-6), 537-551.
53.
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L. & Lushene, R. E. (1988). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 3rd ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
54.
Stodolsky, S. S.; Salk, S. & Glaessner, B. (1991). Student Views About Learning Math and Social Studies. American Educational Research Journal, 28,89-116.
55.
Thompson, A. & Thompson, P. (1989). Affect and problem solving in an elementary school mathematics classroom. In D.B. McLeod & V. Adams (Eds.), Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A New Perspective (pp. 141- 161). New York: Springer-Verlag.
56.
Watts, M. & Ebbutt, D. (1987): More than the sum of the parts: research methods in group interviewing. British Educational Research Journal, 13 (1), 25-34.
58.
Zembylas, M. (2007). Emotional ecology: The intersection of emotional knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 355–367.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
