Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
RESEARCH PAPER
Slope conception as rate of change starter kit: Malaysian pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge in rate of change
1
Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Education, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
Online publication date: 2023-11-05
Publication date: 2023-12-01
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2023;19(12):em2368
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Past research on calculus has shown that students often struggle to understand derivatives due to an overemphasis on algebraic manipulation and procedures rather than grasping the underlying concept. A key factor contributing to this challenge is the lack of a solid understanding of slope as a rate of change. Conceptualizing slope as a rate of change is essential, as it serves as the basis for comprehending derivative concepts. To address this gap, our research explored subject matter knowledge of rate of change, specifically focusing on the slope concept, among Malaysian pre-service mathematics teachers. Our research followed a qualitative methodology, conducting task-based interviews with two pre-service mathematics teachers, Zheng and Amitha, who are majoring in mathematics. The interviews included seven tasks related to slope and ratio concepts. The findings revealed inconsistencies in their notion of rate of change, as they have a loose connection between rate of change and slope concepts, along with its multiplicative property. While they recognized that equivalent values of rate of change indicate a constant rate, they did not grasp that slope also represents a rate of change. Their knowledge appeared limited to viewing derivatives as a method to calculate rate of change, without conceiving the changes occurring between quantities and their multiplicative relationship.
REFERENCES (59)
1.
Amit, M., & Vinner, S. (1990). Some misconceptions in calculus–Anecdotes or the tip of an iceberg? In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 3-10).
2.
Ayebo, A., Ukkelberg, S., & Assuah, C. (2017). Success in introductory calculus: The role of high school and pre-calculus preparation. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 3(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres....
3.
Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449-466. https://doi.org/10.1086/461626.
4.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248....
5.
Bezuidenhout, J. (1998). First-year university students’ understanding of rate of change. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 29(3), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
6.
Brijlall, D., & Ndlovu, Z. (2013). High school learners’ mental construction during solving optimization problems in calculus: A South African case study. South African Journal of Education, 33(2), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.....
7.
Byerley, C. (2019). Calculus students’ fraction and measure schemes and implications for teaching rate of change functions conceptually. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55, 100694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
8.
Byerley, C., & Thompson, P. W. (2014). Secondary teachers’ relative size schemes. In Proceedings of the 38th Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 217-224).
9.
Byerley, C., & Thompson, P. W. (2017). Secondary mathematics teachers’ meanings for measure, slope, and rate of change. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 168-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
10.
Carlson, M. P., Madison, B., & West, R. D. (2015). A study of students’ readiness to learn calculus. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(2), 209-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753....
11.
Cetin, N. (2009). The ability of students to comprehend the function-derivative relationship with regard to problems from their real life. Primus, 19(3), 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/105119....
12.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
13.
Dane, A., Cetin, O. F., Bas, F., & Ozturan Sagirli, M. (2016). A conceptual and procedural research on the hierarchical structure of mathematics emerging in the minds of university students: An example of limit-continuity-integral-derivative. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v....
14.
Desfitri, R. (2016). In-service teachers’ understanding on the concept of limits and derivatives and the way they deliver the concepts to their high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 693, 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
15.
Estonanto, A. J. J., & Dio, R. V. (2019). Factors causing mathematics anxiety of senior high school students in calculus. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 7(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel....
16.
Fothergill, L. (2011). Aspects of calculus for pre-service teachers. Mathematics Educator, 21(1), 23-31.
17.
Fuadah, U. S., Sukma, Y., & Yanda, F. (2022). Book review: A review of the book by Liping Ma (2020), Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(2), 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
18.
Goldin, G. A. (2000). A scientific perspective on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In A. E. Kelly, & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
Gudmundsdottir, S., & Shulman, L. (1987). Pedagogical content knowledge in social studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 31(2), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/003138....
20.
Hashemi, N., Abu, M. S., Kashefi, H., & Rahimi, K. (2014). Undergraduate students’ difficulties in conceptual understanding of derivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 358-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsp....
21.
Herbert, S., & Pierce, R. (2012). Revealing educationally critical aspects of rate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
22.
Jones, S. R. (2017). An exploratory study on student understandings of derivatives in real-world, non-kinematics contexts. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 45, 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
23.
Kertil, M. (2014). Pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ understanding of derivative through a model development unit [Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University].
24.
Kertil, M. (2021). Conceptual analysis of derivative as a rate of change and analysis of the mathematics textbooks. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 11, 545-568. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.....
25.
Kertil, M., & Dede, H. G. (2022). Promoting prospective mathematics teachers’ understanding of derivative across different real-life contexts. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 23(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.4256/ijmtl.....
26.
Lam, T. T. (2009). On in-service mathematics teachers’ content knowledge of calculus and related concepts. The Mathematics Educator, 12(1), 69-86.
27.
Leong, K. E., Meng, C. C., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2015). Understanding Malaysian pre-service teachers mathematical content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 363-370. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
28.
Li, V. L., Julaihi, N. H., & Eng, T. H. (2017). Misconceptions and errors in learning integral calculus. Asian Journal of University Education, 13(2), 17-39.
29.
Maher, C. A., & Sigley, R. (2014). Task-based interviews in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 580-582). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
30.
Makonye, J. P., & Luneta, K. (2014). Mathematical errors in differential calculus tasks in the senior school certificate examinations in South Africa. Education as Change, 18(1), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/168232....
31.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
32.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
33.
Meylani, R., & Teuscher, D. (2011). Calculus readiness: Comparing student outcomes from traditional precalculus and AP calculus AB with a novel precalculus program. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
34.
Mkhatshwa, T. P. (2019). Calculus students’ quantitative reasoning in the context of solving related rates of change problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 22(2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/109860....
35.
Mkhatshwa, T. P., & Doerr, H. M. (2018). Undergraduate students’ quantitative reasoning in economic contexts undergraduate students’ quantitative reasoning in economic. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(2), 142-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/109860....
36.
Nagle, C., & Moore-Russo, D. (2013). The concept of slope: Comparing teachers’ concept images and instructional content. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 6(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/247274....
37.
Nagle, C., Martínez-Planell, R., & Moore-Russo, D. (2019). Using APOS theory as a framework for considering slope understanding. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 54, 100684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
38.
Nasir, N. M., Hashim, Y., Zabidi, S. F. H. A., Awang, R. J., & Zaihidee, E. M. (2013). Preliminary study of student performance on algebraic concepts and differentiation. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21, 162-167.
39.
Orton, A. (1983). Students’ understanding of differentiation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14(3), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0041....
40.
Orton, A. (1984). Understanding rate of change. Mathematics in School, 13(5), 23-26.
41.
Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
42.
Pitt, D. G. (2015). On the scaling of NSW HSC marks in mathematics and encouraging higher participation in calculus-based courses. Australian Journal of Education, 59(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494....
43.
Shamsuddin, M., Mahlan, S. B., Umar, N., & Alias, F. A. (2015). Mathematical errors in advanced calculus: A survey among engineering students. Esteem Academic Journal, 11(2), 37-44.
44.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
45.
Stump, S. (1999). Secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge of slope. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 11, 124-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0321....
46.
Stump, S. L. (2001). Developing pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of slope. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(2), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-....
47.
Tall, D. (1993). Students’ difficulties in calculus. In Proceedings of Working Group 3 on Students’ Difficulties in Calculus (pp. 13-28).
48.
Tall, D. (2009). Dynamic mathematics and the blending of knowledge structures in the calculus. ZDM-International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(4), 481-492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
49.
Tall, D. (2019). The evolution of calculus: A personal experience 1956-2019 [Opening plenary]. The Conference on Calculus in Upper Secondary and Beginning University Mathematics.
50.
Teuscher, D., & Reys, R. E. (2012). Rate of change: AP Calculus students’ understandings and misconceptions after completing different curricular paths. School Science and Mathematics, 112(6), 359-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949....
51.
Thompson, P. W. (2008). Conceptual analysis of mathematical ideas: Some spadework at the foundation of mathematics education. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 31-49).
52.
Thompson, P. W., & Thompson, A. G. (1992). Images of rate. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
53.
Tyne, J. G. (2016). Calculus students’ reasoning about slope and derivative as rates of change [Master’s thesis, University of North Carolina].
54.
Ubuz, B. (2007). Interpreting a graph and constructing its derivative graph: Stability and change in students’ conceptions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(5), 609-637. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
55.
Verzosa, D. (2015). Reading the world with calculus. Primus, 25(4), 349-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/105119....
56.
Weber, E., & Dorko, A. (2014). Students’ and experts’ schemes for rate of change and its representations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 34, 14-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
57.
Weber, E., & Thompson, P. W. (2014). Students’ images of two-variable functions and their graphs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87, 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
58.
Weber, E., Tallman, M., Byerley, C., & Thompson, P. W. (2012). Introducing the derivative via calculus triangles. Mathematics Teacher, 104(4), 274-278. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathte....
59.
Zandieh, M. (2000). A theoretical framework for analyzing student understanding of the concept of derivative. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 8, 103-127. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbmath....
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
