RESEARCH PAPER
Solving Math Problems through the Principles of Scientific Creativity
 
More details
Hide details
1
Vyatka State University, Kirov, RUSSIA
 
2
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA
 
3
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
4
Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan, RUSSIA
 
5
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, RUSSIA
 
6
Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
7
North-Eastern Federal University named after M.K. Ammosov, Yakutsk, RUSSIA
 
 
Publication date: 2020-08-29
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2020;16(10):em1887
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Ongoing changes in mental and personal characteristics of the modern child initiate the updating of means and forms of education. And they, in their turn, update methodological techniques and approaches to the use of methods during the math class. The source of updating methodological techniques may be the principles used when solving scientific problems. Scientific creativity traditionally systematizes knowledge and skills for their use to a wide range of sciences. Therefore, the principles of scientific creativity have a lot in common with different subjects, showing the student the unity of approaches in working with knowledge. In this regard, the article is aimed at substantiating the principles of scientific creativity as effective methodological techniques for finding solutions to math problems and, on their basis, developing recommendations for conducting classes that prepare for final certification at school in mathematics. The leading research methods in this case are: observation of the methodological work of teachers of mathematics, conversations with teachers, analysis of guidance papers and questionnaires of teachers, statistical processing of research results. In 2018-2019 the experiment in which 19 mathematics teachers took part was conducted. Based on its results the authors of the article succeeded in: highlighting the principles of finding solutions to math problems based on the approaches used in scientific creativity; developing and implementing on the basis of these principles recommendations for conducting classes that prepare for final certification at school in mathematics. The effectiveness of using the principles of finding solutions to math problems was assessed. It allowed the authors to conclude that students have an increase in the speed of finding solutions to math problems by an average of 11%. Practical use of the proposed principles makes it possible to organize training for schoolchildren in solving math problems in traditional forms of teaching, but taking into account the particularities of the development of the modern schoolchild. Methodological recommendations developed by the authors can be used to teach students how to find solutions to math problems during classes that prepare for final certification at school in mathematics.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Akpinar, I. A. (2012). The effect of 5e learning model on pre-service science teachers’ achievement in the subject of solutions. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(2), 867-874.
 
2.
Allen, D. K., & Young, J. D. (2020). Tracing metabolic flux through time and space with isotope labeling experiments. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 64, 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copb....
 
3.
Bishara, S. (2016). Creativity in unique problem-solving in mathematics and its influence on motivation for learning. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1202604. https://doi.org/10.1080/233118....
 
4.
Bloom, B. (1984). The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
 
5.
Brisbin, A., Maranhao do Nascimento, E. (2019). Reading Versus Doing: Methods of Teaching Problem-Solving in Introductory Statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 27(3), 154-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/106918....
 
6.
Cherdymova, E. I., Afanasjeva, S. A., Parkhomenko, A. G., Ponyavina, M. B., Yulova, E. S., Nesmeianova, I. A., & Skutelnik, O. A. (2018). Student ecological consciousness as determining component of ecological-oriented activity. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences, 12(2), 167-174.
 
7.
Demchenkova, N. A., & Razuvayeva, N. V. (2014). Heuristic techniques for teaching mathematics to secondary school students. The practice of using natural science methods in applied social and humanitarian researches: a collection of materials of the methodological seminar, December 18-19, 2014. Tolyatti, pp. 210-217.
 
8.
Dover, P. A., Manwani, S., & Munn, D. (2018). Creating learning solutions for executive education programs. International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme....
 
9.
Durkin, K., Star, J. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2017). Using comparison of multiple strategies in the mathematics classroom: Lessons learned and next steps. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(4), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
 
10.
Feldstein, D. I. (2010). Priority areas of the psychological and pedagogical research in the context of significant changes in the child and the situation of his/her development. Pedagogy, 7, 3-11.
 
11.
Galvin, R. (2020). I’ll follow the sun: Geo-sociotechnical constraints on prosumer households in Germany. Energy Research and Social Science, 65, 101455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss....
 
12.
Hernandez, N. V., & Freudenthal, E. (2010). Work in progress - eliciting creative engagement through highly engaging exercises. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.
 
13.
Kalloo, V., Mohan, P., & Kinshuk. (2017). Using games to address problems in mathematics-based e-learning environments. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning, ICEL, 109-116.
 
14.
Khairullina, E. R., Bogdanova, V. I., Slepneva, E. V., Nizamutdinova, G. F., Fatkhullina, L. R., Kovalenko, Y. A., & Skutelnik, O. A. (2019). Global climate change: Cyclical nature of natural and permanent nature of man-made processes. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences, 13(2), 2311-2316.
 
15.
Kosheleva, N. N., & Pavlova, Ye. S. (2017). Formation of heuristic and creative thinking in schoolchildren and students when studying mathematics. Azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology, 3(20), 170-173.
 
16.
Lehmann, J., & Gaskins, B. (2019). Learning scientific creativity from the arts. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 188-193. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599....
 
17.
Mamontova, T. S. (2020). Features of development of creativity of high school students by means of mathematics. Scientific and methodical electronic journal “Concept”, 1, 65-78. Retrieved from http://e-koncept.ru/2020/20100....
 
18.
Mohd, N., & Tengku Mahmood, T. E. P. (2011). The effects of attitude towards problem solving in mathematics achievements. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 1857-1862.
 
19.
Mugallimova, S. R. (2006). About types of heuristic techniques. Omsk Scientific Bulletin, 9(47), 107-109.
 
20.
Payne, A. M., Stephenson, J. E., Morris, W. B., Tempest, H. G., Mileham, A., & Griffin, D. K. (2009). The use of an e-learning constructivist solution in workplace learning. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(3), 548-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergo....
 
21.
Razuvayeva, N. V. (2014). Heuristic techniques in teaching mathematics to students of the secondary school. Actual problems of teaching mathematics, physics and computer science at school and university: a collection of articles of the V Interregional Scientific and Practical Conference of Teachers dedicated to the 75th anniversary of the Faculty of Physics and Mathematics of PSU. Penza, pp. 117-120.
 
22.
Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education. (2017). National Education Technology Plan Update. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017....
 
23.
Santanen, E. L., Briggs, R. O., & De Vreede, G. (2003). The impact of stimulus diversity on creative solution generation: An evaluation of the cognitive network model of creativity. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.....
 
24.
Setyana, I., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Pramudya, I. (2019). Problem-solving in creative thinking process mathematics student’s based on their cognitive style. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(2), 022123. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
 
25.
Shen, C., Miele, D. B., & Vasilyeva, M. (2016). The relation between college students’ academic mindsets and their persistence during math problem solving. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9(3), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2....
 
26.
Spitzer, B., & Aronson, J. (2015). Minding and mending the gap: Social psychological interventions to reduce educational disparities. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.1....
 
27.
Utemov, V. V., & Masalimova, A. R. (2017). Differentiation of creative mathematical problems for primary school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4351-4362. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top