RESEARCH PAPER
Solving the global STEM educational crisis using Cognitive Load Optimization and Artificial Intelligence–A preliminary comparative analysis
More details
Hide details
1
SPM Consulting, AUSTRALIA
2
Assumption University, Bangkok, THAILAND
Online publication date: 2024-04-08
Publication date: 2024-05-01
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(5):em2436
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
There is a persistent STEM educational crisis exemplified by low student enrolments, and both
high failure and attrition rates. ChatGPT is easy to use, however pedagogical quality is not
necessarily assured. In one experiment the output had a high cognitive load exacerbated by
cognitive gaps making the material hard to teach and learn. ChatGPT is a useful pedagogical
technology but not a learning theory. Science, technology and engineering all start by
quantitatively modelling systems in order to make accurate and quantitative predictions prior to
construction or system modification. By contrast, the current learning theories in use today are
based on qualitative soft-science principles, with subjective guidelines that are open to
interpretation, which can lead to wide variations in the quality of instructional materials and
learning outcomes. Cognitive Load Optimization (CLO) is a new Science of Learning (SoL) theory
that quantitatively models relational knowledge as coherent, contiguous, pedagogically scalable
schemas optimized for the lowest cognitive load. CLO schemas represent the easiest, fastest and
most efficient learning paths and are the fundamental basis of instructional design and teaching.
Because CLO schemas are pedagogically scalable it is possible to create CLO schemas that are
contiguous across different educational levels (school, college and university) thereby uniquely
meeting the goals of the American National Science Foundation SoL (‘optimized learning for all’)
and the Australian Grattan Institute (‘optimized learning from pre-school to university’). Using
CLO results in significant improvements in STEM learning outcomes but is a detailed methodology
that can be time consuming to use. The relative advantages and disadvantages of ChatGPT and
CLO are highlighted.
REFERENCES (44)
3.
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed learning outcome). Academic Press.
4.
Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1989). Towards a model of school-based curriculum development and assessment using the SOLO taxonomy. Australian Journal of Education, 33(2), 151-163.
https://doi.org/10.1177/168781....
6.
Cavojsky, M., Kormanik, G. B., T., & Hasin, M. (2023). Exploring the capabilities and possible applications of large language models for education [Paper presentation]. The 21st International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA6....
7.
Cheng, E. W. L. (2016). Learning through variation theory: A case study. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(2), 283-292.
8.
de Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38, 105-134.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251....
9.
Diekhoff, G. M. (1983). Relationship judgements in the evaluation of structural understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 227-233.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-....
11.
Grover, D., & Winton, S. (2017). Digital technologies for the Australian curriculum: A project-based approach for years 7 and 8. Cengage.
12.
Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (2010). Relational Knowledge: The foundation of higher cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14(11), 497-505.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics....
13.
Happs, J. C. (1985). Cognitive learning theory and classroom complexity. Research in Science and Technology Education, 3, 159-174.
https://doi.org/10.1080/026351....
14.
Hassija, V., Singh, A. C., A., Chamola, V., & Sikdar, B. (2023). Unleashing the potential of conversational AI: Amplifying Chat-CPT’s capabilities and tacking technical hurdles. IEE Access, 11, 143657-143682.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS....
16.
Prentzas, J., & Sidiropoulou, M. (2023). Assessing the use of Open AI chat-GPT in a university department of education [Paper presentation]. The 14th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications.
https://doi.org/10.1109/IISA59....
17.
Kennedy, B., Heffron, M., Funk, C. (2018). Half of Americans think young people do not pursue STEM because it is too hard. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/sh....
18.
Lyons, T. (2004). Choosing physical science courses: The importance of cultural and social capital in enrolment decisions of high achieving students [Paper presentation]. The IOSTE X1 Symposium.
19.
Maj, S. P. (2018). Cognitive load optimization–A new, practical, easy-to-use method for enhancing STEM educational outcomes based on the science of learning [Paper presentation]. The 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2....
20.
Maj, S. P. (2020). Cognitive load optimization–A statistical evaluation for three STEM disciplines [Paper presentation]. The IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48....
21.
Maj, S. P. (2021). Benchmarking educational quality–An independent analysis and alternative approach [Paper presentation]. The 38th International Conference on Innovation, Practice & Research in the use of Educational Technologies in Tertiary Education.
https://doi.org/10.14742/ascil....
22.
Maj, S. P. (2021). World class STEM–Benchmarking and delivering based on evidence based cognitive science [Paper presentation]. The IEEE Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering.
23.
Maj, S. P. (2022). A practical new 21st century learning theory for significantly improving STEM learning outcomes at all educational levels. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(2), em2073.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
24.
Maj, S. P., & Nuangjamnong, C. (2020). Using cognitive load optimization to teach STEM disciplines to business students [Paper presentation]. The IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48....
25.
Maj, S. P., & Veal, D. (2007). State model diagrams as a pedagogical tool–An international evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Education, 50(3), 204-207.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.200....
26.
Maj, S. P., Kohli, G., & Fetherston, T. (2005). A pedagogical evaluation of new state model diagrams for teaching internetwork technologies [Paper presentation]. The 28th Australasian Computer Science Conference.
27.
Maj, S. P., Kohli, G., & Murphy, G. (2004). State models for internetworking technologies [Paper presentation]. The 34th IEEE Annual Conference on Frontiers in Education.
28.
Nagy, P. (1984). Cognitive structure and the spatial metaphor. In N. P. (Ed.), The representation of cognitive structure. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
32.
Nuangjamnong, C., & Maj, S. P. (2022). Students behavior intention to adopt cognitive load optimization to teach STEM in graduate studies. Journal of Education Naresan University, 24(3).
33.
Nuangjamnong, C., & Maj, S. P. (2023). Improving business IT learning outcomes using cognitive load optimization–A case study in Chinese graduate studies. AU-GSB E-Journal, 16(2).
34.
PCAST. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
https://obamawhitehouse.archiv....
36.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
37.
Sithole, A., Chiyaka, E. T., McCathy, P., Mupinga, D. M., Buckleing, B. K., & Kibirige, J. (2017). Student attrition, persistence and retention in STEM programs: Successes and continuing challenges. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 46-58.
https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7....
41.
TEQSA. (2020). Foundations for good practice: The student experience of online learning in Australian higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic.
https://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites....
42.
Thomson, W. (1889). Electrical units of measurements. In A. Campbell Sir (Ed.), Popular lectures and addresses by Rev. A. Campbell (pp. 73-136). Kessinger Publishing.
43.
Timms, M. J., Moyle, K., Weldon, P. R., & Mitchell, P. (2018). Challenges in STEM learning in Australian schools: Literature and policy review. Australian Council for Educational Research.
https://research.acer.edu.au/p....