RESEARCH PAPER
Teachers’ perceptions of integrative STEM education in life sciences classrooms
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Education, Durban University of Technology, Petermaritzburg, SOUTH AFRICA
 
 
Publication date: 2024-11-20
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(11):em2535
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to explore teachers’ perceptions of integrative STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education within life sciences classrooms. To achieve this, a case study design was employed, involving three teachers from a single district in South Africa. The data collection methods included face-to-face interviews, analysis of lesson plans, and document examination. The collected data was then analyzed using thematic analysis. The study’s findings shed light on the existing challenges concerning the understanding and implementation of STEM education in life sciences classrooms. The teachers demonstrated limited understanding of STEM integration, mainly through the utilization of models. However, the predominant approach observed was traditional teacher-centered methods, which hindered the promotion of critical thinking among students. As a result, this study emphasizes the need for practical implications in terms of teacher professional development. It highlights the importance of higher education training institutions providing ample opportunities for teachers to enhance their ability to effectively implement integrated STEM education in their classrooms. By addressing these issues, educators can create more engaging and stimulating learning experiences that encourage critical thinking and foster a deeper understanding of STEM concepts among students.
REFERENCES (52)
1.
Aprianty, H., Gani, A., & Pada, A. U. T. (2020). Implementation of project-based learning through STEM approach to improve students’ science process skills and learning outcomes. JTK: Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 5(2), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v....
 
2.
Bada, O. S., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research and Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.4172/2151-6....
 
3.
Bartels, S. L., Rupe, K. M., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Shaping preservice teachers’ understandings of STEM: A collaborative math and science methods approach. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(6), 666-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/104656....
 
4.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.
 
5.
Blanche, M. T., Blanche, M. J. T., Durrheim, K., & Painter, D. (Eds.). (2006). Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences. Juta and Company Ltd.
 
6.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
 
7.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
 
8.
Charette, R. N. (2013). The STEM education is a myth. IEEE Spectrum, 50(9), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.....
 
9.
Ciftci, A., & Topcu, M. S. (2022). Pre-service early childhood teachers’ challenges and solutions to planning and implementing STEM education-based activities. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22, 422-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330....
 
10.
Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2019). Creating a continuum of STEM models: Exploring how K-12 science teachers conceptualize STEM education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(12), 1701-1720. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
11.
Dennick, R. (2016). Constructivism: Reflections on twenty-five years teaching the constructivist approach in medical education. International Journal of Medical Education, 7(3), 200-205. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5....
 
12.
DeSutter, D., & Stieff, M. (2017). Teaching students to think spatially through embodied actions: Design principles for learning environments in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235....
 
13.
El Sayary, A. M. A., Forawi, S. A., & Mansour, N. (2015). STEM education and problem-based learning. In R. Wegerif, L. Li, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking (pp. 357-368). Routledge.
 
14.
English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
15.
Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.). (2005). Constructivism: Theory, perspective, and practice. Teachers College Press.
 
16.
Friedrichsen, P. M., Van Driel, J. H. & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95(2), 358-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20....
 
17.
Giamellaro, M., & Siegel, D. R. (2018). Coaching teachers implement innovations in STEM. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70(3), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate....
 
18.
Giri, V., & Paily, M. U. (2020). Effect of scientific argumentation on the development of critical thinking. Science & Education, 29(3), 673-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
19.
Glazewski, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2020). Fostering complex problem solving for diverse learners: Engaging an ethos of intentionality toward equitable access. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 679-702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423....
 
20.
Guetterman, T. C., & Fetters. M. D. (2018). The methodological approaches to the integration of mixed methods and case study designs: A systematic review. Americas Behavioural Scientist, 62(7), 900-918. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276....
 
21.
Harris, A., & De Bruin, L. R. (2018). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 153-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833....
 
22.
Hubbard, K. (2021). Disciplinary literacies in STEM: What do undergraduates read, how do they read it, and can we teach scientific reading more effectively? Higher Education Pedagogies, 6(1), 41-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/237526....
 
23.
Khotimah, R. D., Adnan, M., Ahmad, C. N. C., & Murtiyasa, B. (2021). Science, mathematics, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education in Indonesia: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1776, Article 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
 
24.
Lai, C. S. (2018). Using inquiry-based strategies for enhancing students’ STEM education learning. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 4(1), 110-117.
 
25.
Lee, O., & Stephens, A. (2020). English learners in STEM subjects: Contemporary views on STEM subjects and language with English learners. Educational Researcher, 49(6), 426-432. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
 
26.
Mafugu, T. (2022). Science pre-service teachers’ experience with mentors during teaching practice. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(11), Article em2170. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
27.
Mafugu, T., Tsakeni, M., & Jita, L. C. (2022). Preservice primary teachers’ perceptions of STEM-based teaching in natural sciences and technology classrooms. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(4), 898-914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330....
 
28.
Mansour, N., & EL-Deghaidy, H. (2015). Science teachers’ perceptions of STEM education: Possibilities and challenges. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 51-54. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.....
 
29.
Marrero, M. E., Gunning, A., & Germain-Williams, T. (2014). What is STEM education? Global Education Review, 1(4), 1-6.
 
30.
Nadelson, L., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparedness: Inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/002206....
 
31.
Obikwelu, C., & Read, J.C. (2012). The serious game constructivist framework for children’s learning. Procedia Computer Science, 15(1), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proc....
 
32.
Permanasari, A., Rubini, B. N., & Nugroho, D. F. (2021). STEM education in Indonesia: Science teachers’ and Students’ perspectives. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 2(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr....
 
33.
Powell, C. K., & Kalina, J. C. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241-250.
 
34.
Prinsley, R., & Johnston, E. (2015). Transforming STEM teaching in Australian primary schools: Everybody’s business. Office of the Chief Scientist. https://www.chiefscientist.gov....
 
35.
Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2016). Investigating pre-service STEM teacher conceptions of STEM education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 759-774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956....
 
36.
Rehmat, A. P., & Hartley, K. (2020). Building engineering awareness: Problem based learning approach for STEM integration. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl....
 
37.
Reynante, B. M., Selbach-Allen, M. E., & Pimentel, D. R. (2020). Exploring the promises and perils of integrated STEM through disciplinary practices and epistemologies. Science & Education, 29(4), 785-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
38.
Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E., & Wieselmann, J. R. (2021). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594....
 
39.
Sanders, M. (2009). Integrative STEM education primer. The Technology Teacher, 68(4). 20-26.
 
40.
Setyowati, Y., Firda, R., & Kasmita, W. (2021). STEM education: Exploring practices across education levels. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21(3), 686-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330....
 
41.
Sevda, K. A., & Sevim, A. (2018). Perceptions of teachers towards the STEM education and the constructivist education approach: Is the constructivist education approach preparatory to STEM education? Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 2175-2186. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.....
 
42.
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of the Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.5703/128828....
 
43.
Tassignon, B., Verschueren, J., Baeyens, J. P., Benjaminse, A., Gokeler, A., Serrien, B., & Clijsen, R. (2021). An exploratory meta-analytic review on the empirical evidence of differential learning as an enhanced motor learning method. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 533033. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
 
44.
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejste....
 
45.
Tikly, L., Joubert, M., Barrett, A. M., Bainton, D., Cameron, L., & Doyle, H. (2018). Supporting secondary STEM education for sustainable development in Africa. Bristol Papers in Education Series. https://www.bristol.ac.uk/medi....
 
46.
Timms, M. J., Moyle, K., Weldon, P. R., & Mitchell, P. (2018). Challenges in STEM learning in Australian schools: Literature and policy review. https://research.acer.edu.au/p....
 
47.
Wang, X., Xu, W., & Guo, L. (2018). The status quo and ways of STEAM education. Promoting China’s future social sustainable development. Sustainability, 10(12), Article 4417. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1012....
 
48.
Williams, J. (2011). STEM education: Proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 16(1), 26-35.
 
49.
Yildirim, Y., & Kizilet, A. (2020). The effects of differential learning method on the tennis ground stroke accuracy and mobility. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(6), 146-154. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9....
 
50.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE.
 
51.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (vol. 5). SAGE.
 
52.
Zheng, Q., Tian, X., Yang, M., & Wang, H. (2019). Differential learning: A powerful tool for interactive content-based image retrieval. Engineering Letters, 27(1).
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top