8/2024 vol. 20
Stats
CC-BY 4.0
Get citation
RESEARCH PAPER
Teaching and learning processes for pre-service mathematics teachers: The case of systems of equations
Al Jupri 1
,
 
Dian Usdiyana 1
,
 
Sumanang Muhtar Gozali 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, INDONESIA
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-07-23
 
 
Publication date: 2024-07-29
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(8):em2482
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14858
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (39)
 
KEYWORDS
pre-service mathematics teachers
symbol sense
systems of equations
teaching and
learning approaches
 
ABSTRACT
This study aims to explore the teaching and learning processes of the school mathematics course for pre-service mathematics teachers in the case of systems of equations. Types of teaching and learning approaches and a symbol sense perspective were used as theoretical frameworks for this study. To do so, we conducted a qualitative case study, involving 35 pre-service mathematics teachers, in the form of classroom observations in one of the state universities in Bandung, Indonesia. The observations included the teaching and learning processes, a written formative test, and interviews. The results showed that the teaching and learning processes are implemented by using a deductive approach, and the written student work from the formative test and interviews revealed various solution strategies. From the symbol sense perspective, we conclude that the teaching and learning processes need to be enhanced to promote pre-service teachers’ procedural skills and conceptual understanding in a balanced manner.
 
REFERENCES (39)
1.
Akpalu, R., Adaboh, S., & Boateng, S. S. (2018). Towards improving senior high school students’ conceptual understanding of system of two linear equations. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(1), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Arcavi, A. (1994). Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(3), 24-35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4....
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Arcavi, A. (2005). Developing and using symbol sense in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(3), 42-47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4....
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Symbol sense behavior in digital activities. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(3), 43-49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4....
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2012). Effects of feedback in an online algebra intervention. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 17(1-2), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Brown, G., & Quinn, R. J. (2007). Investigating the relationship between fraction proficiency and success in algebra. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 63(4), 8-15. https://albert.aamt.edu.au/Jou....
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Byusa, E., Kampire, E., & Mwesigye, A. R. (2020). Analysis of teaching techniques and scheme of work in teaching chemistry in Rwandan secondary schools. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), Article em1848. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Chamoso, J. M., Cáceres, M. J., & Azcárate, P. (2012). Reflection on the teaching-learning process in the initial training of teachers. Characterization of the issues on which pre-service mathematics teachers reflect. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Dewi, I. L. K., Zaenuri, Dwijanto, & Mulyono. (2021). Identification of mathematics prospective teachers’ conceptual understanding in determining solutions of linear equation systems. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1157-1170. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-je....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Drijvers, P. (2000). Students encountering obstacles using a CAS. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 5(3), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Drijvers, P. (2015). Digital technology in mathematics education: Why it works (or doesn’t). In S. Chio (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 135-151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Drijvers, P. (2018). Digital assessment of mathematics: Opportunities, issues and criteria. Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation, 41(1), 41-66. https://doi.org/10.7202/105589....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Drijvers, P., Goddijn, A., & Kindt, M. (2010). Algebra education: Exploring topics and themes. In P. Drijvers (Ed.), Secondary algebra education: Revisiting topics and themes and exploring the unknown (pp. 5-26). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Irfan, M., Nusantara, T., Wijayanto, Z., & Widodo, S. A. (2019). Why do pre-service teachers use the two-variable linear equation system concept to solve the proportion problem? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), Article 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Isik, C., & Kar, T. (2012). The analysis of the problems posed by the pre-service teachers about equations. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(9), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Jupri, A., Drijvers, P., & Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2016). An instrumentation theory view on students’ use of an applet for algebraic substitution. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v2....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Jupri, A., Usdiyana, D., & Gozali, S. M. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ strategies in solving absolute value equations and inequalities. Education Sciences, 12(11), Article 743. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsc....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Jupri, A., Usdiyana, D., & Sispiyati, R. (2020). Predictions of students’ thinking for the learning of system of linear equations in two variables. In L. S. Riza, E. C. Prima, T. Hadibarata, & P. J. Aubusson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar (pp. 1-7). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Jupri, A., Usdiyana, D., & Sispiyati, R. (2021). Teaching and learning process for mathematization activities: The case of solving maximum and minimum problems. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 6(2), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.23917/jrama....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Kılıç, H. (2011). Preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge of students. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 2(2), 17-35. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pu....
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Kilpatrick, J. (2001). Understanding mathematical literacy: The contribution of research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Kirvan, R., Rakes, C. R., & Zamora, R. (2015). Flipping an algebra classroom: Analyzing, modeling, and solving systems of linear equations. Computers in the Schools, 32(3-4), 201-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/073805....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Kop, P. M., Janssen, F. J., Drijvers, P. H., & van Driel, J. H. (2020). The relation between graphing formulas by hand and students’ symbol sense. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105, 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Kop, P. M., Janssen, F. J., Drijvers, P. H., & van Driel, J. H. (2021). Promoting insight into algebraic formulas through graphing by hand. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(2), 125-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/109860....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
McCrory, R., Floden, R., Ferrini-Mundy, J., Reckase, M. D., & Senk, S. L. (2012). Knowledge of algebra for teaching: A framework of knowledge and practices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(5), 584-615. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresem....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Ndemo, Z., Zindi, F., & Mtetwa, D. (2017). Mathematics undergraduate student teachers’ conceptions of guided inductive and deductive teaching approaches. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 6(2), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v6....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Proulx, J., Beisiegel, M., Miranda, H., & Simmt, E. (2009). Rethinking the teaching of systems of equations. The Mathematics Teacher, 102(7), 526-535. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.102....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Ramsden, P. (1987). Improving teaching and learning in higher education: The case for a relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 12(3), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/030750....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77(1), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.1....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Stephan, M. (2020). Teacher-centered teaching in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 836-840). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
Tanisli, D., & Kose, N. Y. (2013). Pre-service mathematic teachers’ knowledge of students about the algebraic concepts. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Van Amerom, B. A. (2003). Focusing on informal strategies when linking arithmetic to early algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Van Dooren, W., Verschaffel, L., & Onghena, P. (2003). Pre-service teachers’ preferred strategies for solving arithmetic and algebra word problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
van Stiphout, I., Drijvers, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2013). The development of students’ algebraic proficiency. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2-3), 62-80. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Wardani, S., & Kusuma, I. W. (2020). Comparison of learning in inductive and deductive approach to increase student’s conceptual understanding based on international standard curriculum. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Wilson, S., & McChesney, J. (2018). From course work to practicum: Learning to plan for teaching mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 20(2), 96-113. https://mted.merga. net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/406.
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford publications. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.1....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Young, J. W. A. (1968). The teaching of mathematics. The Mathematics Teacher, 61(3), 287-295. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.61.....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
Quadrilaterals hierarchical classification and properties of the diagonals: A study with pre-service mathematics teachers
Pre-service Teachers’ Secondary School Experiences in Learning Geometry and their Confidence to Teach it
The effect of a training program based on TIMSS to developing the levels of habits of mind and mathematical reasoning skills among pre-service mathematics teachers
The Relationships Among Pre-service Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs about Mathematics, Mathematics Teaching, and Use of Technology in China
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top