LITERATURE REVIEW
Teaching sequences based on the STEM approach for the development of inquiry in early childhood education: A systematic review
 
More details
Hide details
1
Universidad Antonio Nariño, Facultad de Educación, Grupo de Investigación Conciencia, Calle 22 sur # 12D-81, 111821, Bogotá, COLOMBIA
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-09-26
 
 
Publication date: 2024-10-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(10):em2517
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In light of the growing significance of the STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) approach in education and the necessity to foster inquiry from an early age, this systematic review was conducted to identify didactic sequences that adopt a STEM approach and facilitate the advancement of inquiry in early childhood education. The results demonstrate that the didactic sequences facilitate disciplinary integration, providing a valuable opportunity to develop inquiry through the resolution of real-life problems and the promotion of interdisciplinary and active learning. Nevertheless, the necessity for additional research and the development of tailored resources to facilitate the effective implementation of these sequences in early childhood education settings is underscored. Concurrently, the significance of specialized and updated teacher training to maximize the impact of these educational practices is emphasized, thereby ensuring the optimal development of inquiry skills in children from an early age.
REFERENCES (50)
1.
Alcalá, M. C. G., & Maqueda, E. M. (2022). Iniciación a las prácticas científicas en educación infantil: aprendiendo sobre el sistema digestivo por indagación basada en modelos [Introduction to scientific practices in early childhood education: learning about the digestive system through model-based inquiry]. Revista Eureka, 19(1), Article 1202. https://doi.org/10.25267/REV_E....
 
2.
Awang, Z., Yakob, N., Hamzah, A., & Talling, M. M. (2020). Exploring steam teaching in preschool using Fred Rogers approach. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 1071-1078. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere....
 
3.
Barbaran, R., Huaman, L., León, H., Jhon, M., Mateo, J., Ososrio, L., Pareja, N., Pérez, D., Quispe, A., Rodríguez, L., Vizcarra, Y., & Yupanqui, S. (2022). Enfoque STEAM: Aprendizaje mediante la interdisiciplinariedad [STEAM approach: Learning through interdisciplinarity]. Revista Renovación, 10, 56-61. https://www.researchgate.net/p....
 
4.
Barragán Caro, A., Plazas Cepeda, N. I., & Ramírez Vanegas, G. A. (2018). La lectura de imágenes: Una herramienta para el pensamiento crítico [Reading images: A tool for critical thinking]. Educación y Ciencia, (19).
 
5.
Barraza Macías, A., Valles Terrones, A., Piñón Torres, G. J., Soto Aguilar, P. M., Manuel Segovia, V., Bustillos García, S., Heredia Corral, L. Y., Torrecillas Herrera, N., Uribe Salazar, G., García Vázquez, I. J., Castañeda García, A., Martínez Arcineaga, H., Luis Vallejo, J., Ortiz Martínez, E., Reyes Marín, M., Ortega, S., Valenzuela Parra, S. J., & de Lima Moreno Luna, R. (2020). Modelos de secuencias didácticas [Models of didactic sequences]. Editado en México.
 
6.
Bastida Izaguirre, D. B. (2019). Adaptación del modelo 5E con el uso de herramientas digitales para la educación: propuesta para el docente de ciencias [Adaptation of the 5E model with the use of digital tools for education: Proposal for science teachers]. Revista Cientifica, 34(1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.14483/23448....
 
7.
Bogdan, R., & García-Carmona, A. (2021). De STEM nos gusta todo menos STEM. Un análisis crítico de una pujante tendencia educativa [We like everything about STEM except STEM. A critical analysis of a thriving educational trend]. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias, 39(1), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/en....
 
8.
Campbell, C., Speldewinde, C., Howitt, C., & Macdonald, A. (2018). STEM practice in the early years. Creative Education, 9(1), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.201....
 
9.
Chen, Y. L., & Tippett, C. D. (2022). Project-based inquiry in STEM teaching for preschool children. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4), Article em2093. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
10.
Cherniak, S., Lee, K., Cho, E., & Jung, S. E. (2019). Child-identified problems and their robotic solutions. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 17(4), 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/147671....
 
11.
Dejonckeere, P. J. N., de Wit, N., van de Keere, K., & Vervaet, S. (2016). Exploring the classroom: Teaching science in early childhood. European Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-je....
 
12.
Del Valle Grisales, L. M., & Mejía Aristizábal, L. S. (2016). Development of scientific skills in early childhood. A case study among kindergarten children at Institucion Educativa Villa Flora, Medellín. Ikala, 21(2), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.....
 
13.
Dilek, H., Tasdemir, A., Konca, A. S., & Baltaci, S. (2020). Preschool children’s science motivation and process skills during inquiry-based STEM activities. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 6(2), Article 92-104. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh....
 
14.
Dufranc, I., García, E., Fridberg, M., Cronquist, B., & Redfors, A. (2020). Robotics and early-years STEM education: The botSTEM framework and activities. European Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejste....
 
15.
Espinosa Moreno, C., & Gregorio Olivares, M. (2018). La robótica en educación infantil [Robotics in early childhood education]. CORE. https://core.ac.uk/download/pd....
 
16.
Fleer, M. (2023). The role of imagination in science education in the early years under the conditions of a Conceptual PlayWorld. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 42, Article 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi....
 
17.
Fridberg, M., & Redfors, A. (2019). Preschool teachers’ role in establishing joint action during children’s free inquiry in STEM. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 5(2), 151-169. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem....
 
18.
Fridberg, M., & Redfors, A. (2021). Teachers’ and children’s use of words during early childhood STEM teaching supported by robotics. International Journal of Early Years Education, 32(2), 405-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/096697....
 
19.
González-González, C. S. (2018). La enseñanza-aprendizaje del pensamiento computacional en edades tempranas: Una revisión del estado del arte [Teaching-learning of computational thinking at early ages: A review of the state of the art]. In M. Zapata-Ros, & K. O. Villalba Condor (Eds.), Computational thinking. Editorial Universidad Católica de Santa María de Arequipa, Peru. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.....
 
20.
Herwinarso, Koswojo, J., & Pratidhina, E. (2023). Development of an inquiry-based module with scientific equipment to facilitate primary school students learning the force concept. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(2), 314-322. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr....
 
21.
ICFES. (2020). Ciencias naturales y educación ambiental, marco de referencia para la evaluación [Natural sciences and environmental education, a framework for evaluation]. Instituto Colombiano para la Evaluación de la Educación. https://www.icfes.gov.co/docum....
 
22.
Isabelle, A. D., Russo, L., & Velázquez-Rojas, A. (2021). Using the engineering design process (EDP) to guide block play in the kindergarten classroom: Exploring effects on learning outcomes. International Journal of Play, 10(1), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/215949....
 
23.
Isik-Ercan, Z. (2020). ‘You have 25 kids playing around!’: Learning to implement inquiry-based science learning in an urban second-grade classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 42(3), 329-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
24.
Jurado, L., Ramírez, C., & Ávila, A. (2020). Innovación Stem en aulas rurales: Una sinergia entre la Ingeniería y los colegios [STEM innovation in rural classrooms: A synergy between engineering and schools]. Encuentro Internacional de Educación En Ingenierúa ACOFI.
 
25.
Kewalramani, S., Palaiologou, I., & Dardanou, M. (2020). Children’s engineering design thinking processes: The magic of the ROBOTS and the power of BLOCKS (electronics). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(3), Article em1830. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
26.
Mazo, A., & Cano, J. (2023). La indagación: una estrategia para integrar ciencias naturales y matemáticas en la educación STEM [Inquiry: A strategy for integrating science and mathematics in STEM education]. Cuadernos Pedagógicos, 25(35), 1-14. https://revistas.udea.edu.co/i....
 
27.
MINEDU. (2015). Rutas del aprendizaje ¿Qué y cómo aprenden nuestros niños y niñas?: II ciclo. Área curricular ciencia y ambiente, 3, 4 y 5 años de edad. Versión 2015 [Learning routes. What and how do our children learn?: II cycle. Science and environment curriculum area, 3, 4 and 5 years of age. Version 2015]. Ministerio de Educación. https://repositorio.minedu.gob....
 
28.
Misirli, A., & Komis, V. (2023). Computational thinking in early childhood education: The impact of programming a tangible robot on developing debugging knowledge. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 65, 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecre....
 
29.
Munkebye, E., & Staberg, R. L. (2023). Qualifying the science experiences of young students through dialogue–A Norwegian lesson study. Cogent Education, 10(1), Article 2164006. https://doi.org/10.1080/233118....
 
30.
Ortega-Quevedo, V., Gil Puente, C., Vallés Rapp, C., & López-Luengo, M. A. (2020). Diseño y validación de instrumentos de evaluación de pensamiento crítico en educación primaria [Design and validation of critical thinking assessment instruments in primary education]. Tecné, Episteme Y Didaxis: TED, (48), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.17227/ted.n....
 
31.
Otero, J. M., & Ortega, J. H. (2020). Una metamorfosis educativa para alcanzar el desarrollo humano sostenible [An educational metamorphosis to achieve sustainable human development]. Profesorado, Revista De Currículum Y Formación Del Profesorado, 24(3), 149-173. https://doi.org/10.30827/profe....
 
32.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., …, & Alonso-Fernández, S. A. (2021). Declaración PRISMA 2020: Una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas [The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews]. Revista Española de Cardiología, 74(9), 790-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rece....
 
33.
Park, D., & Park, M. (2021). Sinking or floating: An inquiry-based STEM activity for children. Childhood Education, 97(6), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/000940....
 
34.
Parra Sarmiento, S. R., Gómez Zermeño, M. G., & Pintor Chávez, M. M. (2015). Factors affecting the implementation of ICT in teaching and learning processes in the 5th level of a Colombian primary school. Revista Complutense de Educación, 26(2015), 197-213. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RC....
 
35.
Patiño Hernández, M., & Tuta López, L. M. (2019). Secuencia didáctica para el favorecimiento de la competencia lectora en escuela nueva [Teaching sequence to promote reading competence in the new school]. Educación y Ciencia, (22), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.19053/0120-....
 
36.
Perales Palacios, F. J., & Morales, D. A. (2020). Ciencia-tecnología-sociedad vs. STEM: ¿Evolución, revolución o disyunción? [Science-technology-society vs. STEM: Evolution, revolution or disjunction?] Ápice. Revista de Educación Científica, 4(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.17979/arec.....
 
37.
Peretti, L., Furci, V., & Trinidad, O. (2019). Formación docente en contexto STEM: Actividades experimentales abiertas mediadas por tecnología Arduino en la enseñanza de la física [Teacher training in a STEM context: Open experimental activities mediated by Arduino technology in physics teaching]. Revista de Enseñanza de La Física, 31, 707-714.
 
38.
Quispe, J. (2023). Advantages of STEM education. International Scientific Research Journal, 4(1), 88-100.
 
39.
Rivadeneira Suárez, I. G. (2023). Producción de un cuento audiovisual educativo para la prevención del abuso sexual infantil [Production of an educational audiovisual story for the prevention of child sexual abuse] [BSc. thesis, Universidad del Azuay].
 
40.
Rodríguez Ortiz, A. M. (2018). Elementos ontológicos del pensamiento crítico [Ontological elements of critical thinking]. Teoría de la Educación, 30(1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.14201/teore....
 
41.
Romero-Ariza, M. (2017). El aprendizaje por indagación: ¿Existen suficientes evidencias sobres sus beneficios en la enseñanza de las ciencias? [Inquiry learning: Is there sufficient evidence of its benefits in science teaching?] Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 14(2), 286-299. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_E....
 
42.
Ruiz-Rey, F. J., Hernández Hernández, P., & Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M. (2018). Programación y robótica educativa: Enfoque didáctico-técnico y experiencias de aula [Programming and educational robotics: Didactic-technical approach and classroom experiences]. https://riuma.uma.es/xmlui/han....
 
43.
Sánchez Vera, M. del M. (2020). La robótica, la programación y el pensamiento computacional en la educación infantil [Robotics, programming and computational thinking in early childhood education]. Revista Infancia, Educación y Aprendizaje, 7(1), 209-234.
 
44.
Siemens Stiftung. (2021). STEAM+Género: Una propuesta para fortalecer la educación inicial con equidad [STEAM+Gender: A proposal to strengthen early childhood education with equity]. https://educacion.stem.siemens....
 
45.
Speldewinde, C., Kilderry, A., & Campbell, C. (2023). Beyond the preschool gate: Teacher pedagogy in the Australian ‘bush kinder’. International Journal of Early Years Education, 31(1), 236-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/096697....
 
46.
Tobar, A. N. A. (2022). Secuencias didácticas como estrategia pedagógica en la enseñanza de las ciencias naturales [Teaching sequences as a pedagogical strategy in the teaching of natural sciences]. Redlaecin, 1(1), 505-522.
 
47.
Tobón, S. T., Pimienta Prieto, J. H., & García Fraile, J. A. (2010). Secuencias didácticas: Aprendizaje y evaluación [Teaching sequences: Learning and evaluation]. Pearson.
 
48.
Torres, C. (2015). Simular problemas sociales con videojuegos. Algunas claves para el diseño de videojuegos críticos [Simulating social problems with video games. Some keys to designing critical video games]. Revista Kepes, 12(12), 193-226. https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes....
 
49.
Yapurasi Quelcahuanca, H. Y. (2015). Efecto del programa THAQHIRI en el proceso de indagación científica [Effect of the THAQHIRI program on the scientific inquiry process] [Master’s thesis, Universidad Cayetano Heredia].
 
50.
Yepes Miranda, D., & Lee, L. L. (2022). STEM y sus oportunidades en el ámbito educativo [STEM and its opportunities in the educational field]. Acta ScientiÆ InformaticÆ, 6(6), 1-6.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top