RESEARCH PAPER
The Model of STEM Education as an Innovative Technology in the System of Higher Professional Education of the Russian Federation
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Nursing Activities and Social work, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, RUSSIA
 
2
Department of Social Pedagogy, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN-University), Moscow, RUSSIA
 
3
Department of Social and Cultural Practices and Performing Arts, Moscow City University, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
4
Department of Psychology, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
5
Department of Foreign Languages and Speech Communication, Moscow International University, Moscow, RUSSIA
 
6
Department of Linguistics and Translation Studies, Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University), Moscow, RUSSIA
 
 
Publication date: 2021-08-24
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2021;17(9):em2007
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
To study STEM and STEAM education as an innovative technology, the authors of the paper conducted a comprehensive theoretical and methodological study on the stated problem. A comprehensive theoretical and methodological study was directed towards the solution to the problem of developing a new model for the STEM and STEAM education system to make correct management decisions in the framework of the country’s socio-economic development based on objective data. The object of the study was STEM and STEAM education as an innovative technology. The subject of this study is the mechanisms of STEM and STEAM-education in the system of higher professional education of the Russian Federation. The methodological foundation of the study was the general scientific ideas for holistic, systemic, and integrative approaches to the study, which gave an opportunity to assess a set of interrelated and interacting elements that form a certain integrity. The use of these approaches provided a comprehensive analysis and formulation of the research problem and determined the strategy for its study. Both theoretical and empirical methods of studying the indicated problem were used in the comprehensive theoretical and methodological study presented in the paper. The leading methods of scientific knowledge were the following: the method of comparison; phenomenological data analysis; discourse analysis of the text; theoretical analysis; empirical description (expert assessment method and in-depth interviews). The result of the study is the STEM education model developed by the authors as an innovative technology in the system of higher professional education of the Russian Federation. The materials of the paper will be useful for specialists in the field of higher professional education, teachers of natural sciences and humanities, the teaching method of which is based on the STEM approach.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Akiri, E., Tor, H. M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Teaching and assessment methods: STEM teachers’ perceptions and implementation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(6), em1969. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
2.
Alsmadi, M. A. (2020). Requirements for application of the STEM approach as perceived by science, math and computer teachers and their attitudes towards it. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(9), em1879. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
3.
Bahrum, S. & Wahid, N. & Ibrahim, N. (2017). Integration of STEM education in Malaysia and why to STEAM. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7, 646-654. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBS....
 
4.
Barroso, N. C. (2020). Mathematical models in predicting retention of STEM students in pre-calculus. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), ep2004. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdl....
 
5.
Begishev, I., Khisamova, Z., & Vasyukov, V. (2021). From robotics technology to environmental crimes involving robots. E3S Web of Conferences, 244, 12029. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3scon....
 
6.
Caplan, M. (2017). Scientists for tomorrow — A self-sustained initiative to promote STEM in out-of-school time frameworks in under-served community-based organizations: Evaluation and lessons learned. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (24—28 June 2017). Columbus, Ohio. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--....
 
7.
Changtong, N., Maneejak, N., & Yasri, P. (2020). Approaches for implementing STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics) activities among middle school students in Thailand. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(1), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.....
 
8.
Dawson, C. (2019). Tackling limited spatial ability: lowering one barrier into STEM?. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.30935/scima....
 
9.
Frolov, A. (2010). The role of STEM education in the “new economy” of the USA Questions of the New Economy, 4(16), 80-90.
 
10.
Gatan, P. R. G., Yangco, R., & Monterola, S. L. (2021). Relationships among environmental literacy, locus of control, and future orientation of STEM students in the Philippines. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2250. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese....
 
11.
Goates, C. B., Whiting, J. K., Berardi, M. L., Gee, K., & Neilsen, T. (2016). The sound of STEAM: Acoustics as the bridge between the arts and STEM. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000....
 
12.
Grebenyuk, T. B., & Bulan, I. G. (2020). Using the STEM approach in the context of secondary vocational education. Bulletin of the Baltic State Academy of Fishing Fleet: Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, 1(51), 22-29.
 
13.
Gunawan, S., & Shieh, C.-J. (2020). Effects of the application of STEM curriculum integration model to living technology teaching on business school students’ learning effectiveness. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep279. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedte....
 
14.
Hashemi, N., Abu, M., Kashefi, H., Mokhtar, M., & Rahimi, K. (2015). Designing learning strategy to improve undergraduate students’ problem solving in derivatives and integrals: A conceptual framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11, 227-238. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
15.
Kalugina, O. A., Vasbieva, D. G., Shaidullina, A. R., Sokolova, N. L. & Grudtsina, L. Y. (2018). ESP blended learning based on the use of smart coursebook. XLinguae, 11(2), 445-454. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.20....
 
16.
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594....
 
17.
Konyushenko, S. М., Zhukov, M. S., & Moshev, Е. А. (2018). STEM vs STEAM – education: a change in understanding how to teach. Bulletin of the Baltic State Academy of Fishing Fleet: Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, 2(44), 99-103.
 
18.
Kvachev V. G., & Yudina M. A. (2017). Industry 4.0: Job Failure or Creative Labor Victory? Public administration. Electronic Bulletin, 64, 140-158.
 
19.
Kvon, G. M., Vaks, V. B., Kalimullin, A. M., Bayanova, A. R., Shaidullina, A. R., Dolzhikova, A. V., & Lapidus, N. I. (2019). Developing the informational and digital environment of a university: Problem analysis and assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(10), em1767. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
20.
Loyalka, P., Liu, O.L., Li, G., Kardanova, E., Chirikov, I., Hu, S., Yu, N., Ma, L., Guo, F., Beteille, T., Tognatta, N., Gu, L., Ling, G., Federiakin, D., Wang, H., Khanna, S., Bhuradia, A., Shi, Z., & Li, Y. (2021). Skill levels and gains in university STEM education in China, India, Russia and the United States. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 892-904. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562....
 
21.
Ma, Y. (2021). Reconceptualizing STEM Education in China as Praxis: A Curriculum Turn. Sustainability, 13(9), 4961-1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1309....
 
22.
Nechitailo, A. N., & Makeev, A. A. (2018). The principle of duality of consciousness and its consideration in modern technologies of teaching a course in general physics. World of Science, Culture, Education, 1(68), 79-80.
 
23.
Park, J.-Y., & Nuntrakune, T. (2013). A conceptual framework for the cultural integration of cooperative learning: A Thai primary mathematics education perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(3), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
24.
Parks, M. B., Hendryx, E. P., & Taylor, A. T. (2021). The Study of Stream Litter Accumulation as a Model for Cross-Disciplinary, Transformative, Affordable, and Scalable Undergraduate Research Experiences in STEM. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(3), e2245. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese....
 
25.
Phillips, A., Hassanali, M., & Wingrave, J. A. (2019). The symbol linked explicit unpacking (SLEU) method for solving STEM problems. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.30935/scima....
 
26.
Sabirova, F. M., & Deryagin, A. V. (2018). The creation of junior schoolchildren’s interest in the experimental study of physical phenomena using the elements of the technology of problem-based. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2), 150-154. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.....
 
27.
Salakhova, V. B., Bazhdanova, Y. V., Dugarova, T. T., Morozova, N. S., & Simonova, M. M. (2020). The crisis of education in conditions of the covid-19 pandemic: The model of blended learning. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(12), 1411–1416.
 
28.
Segura, W. A. (2017). The use of STEAM in higher education for high school teachers. Journal 21 World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Proceedings (WMSCI 2017), 1, 308-312.
 
29.
Shchedrovitsky, G. P. (2016). Scheme of thought activity - system-structural structure, meaning and content. Selected works (pp. 281-298). Мoscow.
 
30.
Shchedrovitsky, G. P., Rozin, V. M., Alekseev, N. G., & Nepomnyashchaya, N. (2017). Pedagogy and logic. Kastal.
 
31.
Skurikhina, J. A., Valeeva, R. A., Khodakova, N. P., & Maystrovich, E. V. (2018). Forming research competence and engineering thinking of school students by means of educational robotics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1639. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-....
 
32.
Starcic, A. I., Huang, P. S., Valeeva, R. A., Latypova, L. A., & Huang, Y. M. (2017). Digital storytelling and mobile learning: Potentials for internationalization of higher education curriculum. In T.-C. Huang, R. Lau, Y.-M. Huang, M. Spaniol, & C.-H. Yuen (Eds.). Emerging Technologies for Education - 2nd International Symposium, SETE 2017, Held in Conjunction with ICWL 2017, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 400-406). Verlag: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
33.
Tugun, V., Bayanova, A. R., Erdyneeva, K. G., Mashkin, N. A., Sakhipova, Z. M., & Zasova, L. V. (2020). The Opinions of Technology Supported Education of University Students. International journal of emerging technologies in learning, 15(23), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v....
 
34.
Usak, M., Masalimova, A. R., Cherdymova, E. I., & Shaidullina, A. R. (2020). New playmaker in science education: COVID-19. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 180-185. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/....
 
35.
Vakhitova, E. I., & Fedorova A. A. (2019). The use of STEM and STEAM elements in vocational training in the preparation of technical bachelors. Questions of Pedagogy, 2, 20-22.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top