RESEARCH PAPER
The Role of Cognitive Factors in Year Five Pupils' Algebraic Thinking: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Mathematical Sciences, Sunway University, MALAYSIA
 
 
Publication date: 2021-01-20
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2021;17(1):em1935
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Algebraic thinking in children can bridge the cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. This quantitative study aimed to develop and test a cognitive model that examines the cognitive factors influencing algebraic thinking among Year Five pupils. A total of 720 Year Five pupils from randomly selected national schools in Malaysia participated in this study. Two mathematics instruments were used to evaluate the participants’ number, symbol, operation, and pattern senses and their algebraic thinking respectively. Data was analysed using a structural equation modelling and Partial Least Squares regression. The results indicated that the proposed cognitive factors influence algebraic thinking significantly, with the most influential factor being symbol sense followed by pattern sense, number sense, and operation sense. The finding implies that educators should consider implementing activities related to these cognitive factors when teaching mathematics to enhance the pupils’ transition from arithmetic to algebra.
REFERENCES (56)
1.
Alibali, M. W., Knuth, E. J., Hattikudur, S., McNeil, N. M., & Stephens, A. C. (2007). A longitudinal examination of middle school students’ understanding of the equal sign and equivalent equations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9, 221-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/109860....
 
2.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2....
 
3.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Psychology Press.
 
4.
Arcavi, A. (1994). Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(3), 24-35.
 
5.
Ardiansari, L., & Wahyudin. (2019). Operation sense in algebra of junior high school students through an understanding of distributive law. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521, 032003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
 
6.
Ayhan. K., & Nilufer. Y.K., (2017). Relational thinking: The bridge between arithmetic and algebra. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(1), 131-145. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee....
 
7.
Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2003). Developing elementary teachers’: “Algebra eyes and ears”. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(2), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.10....
 
8.
Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2004). Elementary grades students’ capacity for functional thinking. In M. J. Hoines, & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 135-142). Bergen University College.
 
9.
Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2008). Building district capacity for teacher development in algebraic reasoning. In J. J Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 361-388). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131....
 
10.
Brizuela, B., & Schliemann, A. (2004). Ten-year-old students solving linear equations. For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(2), 33-40.
 
11.
Byrd, C. E., McNeil, N. M., Chesney, D. L., & Matthews, P. G. (2015). A specific misconception of the equal sign acts as a barrier to children’s learning of early algebra. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lind....
 
12.
Cai, J., & Moyer, J. (2008). Developing algebraic thinking in earlier grades: some insights from international comparative studies. In National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 169-193). NCTM.
 
13.
Carpenter, T. P., & Levi, L. (2000). Developing conceptions of algebraic reasoning in the primary grades (Report no. 002). Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
 
14.
Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2007). Early algebra and algebraic reasoning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 669-705). Information Age Publishing.
 
15.
Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., & Schwartz, J. L. (2008). Early algebra is not the same as algebra early. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 235-272). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131....
 
16.
Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., Brizuela, B. M., & Earnest, D. (2006). Arithmetic and algebra in early mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(2), 87-115.
 
17.
Chan, Y. L., Maun, R., & Krishnan, G. (2018). Mathematics Year 5. Alias, A. R., Hamdan, N.A. (Eds.). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
 
18.
Childs, K. M. (1995). An investigation of the role of patterns in developing algebraic thinking (UMI No. 9615789) (Doctoral dissertation), Texas A&M University.
 
19.
Chrysostomou, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Tsingi, C., Cleanthous, E., & Christou, C. (2013). Examining number sense and algebraic reasoning through cognitive styles. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83, 205-223. https://doi.org.10.1007/s10649....
 
20.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum.
 
21.
Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1203-1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
 
22.
Driscoll, M., & Moyer, J. (2001). Using students’ work as a lens on algebraic thinking. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(5), 282-286. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.6....
 
23.
Ferrini-Mundy, J., Lappan, G., & Phillips, E. (1997). Experiences with patterning. Teaching Children Mathematics, 3(6), 282-288. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.3.....
 
24.
Gozde. A., & Dilek, T. (2017). An analysis of middle school mathematics textbooks from the perspective of fostering algebraic thinking through generalization. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(6), 2001-2030. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.....
 
25.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Inc.
 
26.
Haldar, L. C. (2014). Students’ understandings of arithmetic generalizations (UMI No. 3640454) (Doctoral dissertation), University of California, Berkeley.
 
27.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-....
 
28.
Herscovics, N., & Linchevski, L. (1994). A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(1), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0128....
 
29.
Houssart, J., & Evens, H. (2003). Approaching algebra through sequence problems: Exploring children’s strategies. Research in Mathematics Education, 5(1), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/147948....
 
30.
Hsu, C. Y., Yang, D. C., & Li, F. M. (2001). The design of “The fifth and sixth grade number sense rating scale”. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 9(4), 351-374.
 
31.
Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Battey, D. (2007). Professional development focused on children’s algebraic reasoning in elementary school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 258-288. https://doi.org/10.2307/300348....
 
32.
Jurdak, M. E., & El Mouhayar, R. R. (2014). Trends in the development of student level of reasoning in pattern generalization tasks across grade level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85, 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
33.
Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5-17). Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131....
 
34.
Kaput, J., Carraher, D. W., & Blanton, M. L. (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 361-388). Taylor and Francis Group.
 
35.
Kieran, C. (1996). The changing face of school algebra. In C. Alsina, J. Alvarez, B. Hodgson, C. Laborde, & A. Pérez (Eds.), 8th International congress on mathematical education: selected lectures (pp. 271-290). S.A.E.M. Thales.
 
36.
Kieran, C., Pang, J., Schifter, D., & Ng, S. F. (2016). Early algebra: Research into its nature, its learning, its teaching. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
37.
Kim, J., Kim, J., DesJardins, S. L., & McCall, B. P. (2015). Completing Algebra II in high school: does it increase college access and success? The Journal of Higher Education, 86(4), 628-662. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.20....
 
38.
Knuth, E. J., Alibali, M. W., McNeil, N. M., Weinberg, A., & Stephens, A. C. (2011). Middle school students’ understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equivalence & variable. In J. Cai, & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization (pp. 259-276). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
39.
Lannin, J. K., Barker, D. D., & Townsend, B. E. (2006). Recursive and explicit rules: How can we build student algebraic understanding? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25, 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
 
40.
Mason, J. (2008). Making use of children’s power to produce algebraic thinking. In J. Kaput, D. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 57-94). Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131....
 
41.
McIntosh, A., Reys, B. J., & Reys, R. E. (1992). A proposed framework for examining basic number sense. For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(3), 2-8.
 
42.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h00431....
 
43.
Ralston, N. C. (2013). The development and validation of a diagnostic assessment of algebraic thinking skills for students in the elementary grades (UMI No. 3588844) (Doctoral dissertation), University of Washington.
 
44.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Matthews, P. G., Taylor, R. S., & McEldoon, K. L. (2011). Assessing knowledge of mathematical equivalence: A construct-modeling approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 85-104. https://doi.org.10.1037/a00213....
 
45.
Schubert, C., Gfeller, M., and Donohue, C. (2013). Using Group Explorer in teaching abstract algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science, 44(3), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
 
46.
Slavit, D. (1999). The role of operation sense in transitions from arithmetic to algebraic thought. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(3), 251-274. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003....
 
47.
Smith, E. (2008). Representational thinking as a framework for introducing functions in the elementary curriculum. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 133-163). Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131....
 
48.
Stacey, K. (1989). Finding and using patterns in linear generalising problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(2), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0057....
 
49.
Swafford, J. O., & Langrall, C. W. (2000). Grade 6 students’ preinstructional use of equations to describe and represent problem situations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 89-112. https://doi.org/10.2307/749821.
 
50.
Swangrojn, P. (2003). Solving algebra word problems: Solution strategies Thai students used and potential connections with teachers’ instructional strategies (UMI No. 3103575) (Doctoral dissertation), Oregon State University.
 
51.
Van Amerom, B. A. (2002). Reinvention of early algebra (Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University). https://dspace.library.uu.nl/h....
 
52.
Warren, E. A., Cooper, T. J., & Lamb, J. T. (2006). Investigating functional thinking in the elementary classroom: Foundations of early algebraic reasoning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25, 208-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
 
53.
Whitley, J. E. (2019). The unfolding of third graders’ conceptualization of a function: A collective case study (UMI No. 27549067) (Doctoral dissertation), Kansas State University.
 
54.
Yang, D. C. (2003). Teaching and learning number sense—An intervention study of fifth grade students in Taiwan. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026....
 
55.
Yang, D. C., & Jan H. J. (2019). The study of primary school teachers’ performance on number sense. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 9(5), 342-349. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet....
 
56.
Yang, D. C., Hsu, C. J., & Huang, M. C. (2004). A study of teaching and learning number sense for sixth grade students in Taiwan. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 407-430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top