Archives
Current issue
About
About us
Aims and Scope
Abstracting and Indexing
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Journal History
Publisher
Follow us: Twitter
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licencing
Publication Fees
Fee Waiver Policy for Doctoral Students
EJMSTE Language Editing Service
More
Statistics
Special Issues
Special Issue Announcements
Published Special Issues
RESEARCH PAPER
The Validity of a Design Technology for a Higher Education Quality Assurance System Based on the EFQM Model
1
National Agrarian Scientific and Educational Center, Constitution Str. 12, 010003 Astana, KAZAKHSTAN
2
International Education Corporation, Ryskulbekov Str. 28, 050043 Almaty, KAZAKHSTAN
3
Kazakh Leading Academy of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Akjar microdistrict 22, 050043 Almaty, KAZAKHSTAN
Online publication date: 2017-12-07
Publication date: 2017-12-07
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(3):831-847
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In current conditions, higher educational institutions have to develop innovative mechanisms of education quality assurance independently. One such mechanism is the implementation of the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) model, although the 9001:2001 International Organization for Standardization (ISO) model is widely implemented in the higher education system of Kazakhstan. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) model is widely implemented in the higher education system of Kazakhstan. In-depth theoretical and methodological studies developed a design technology for a quality assurance system. The purpose of this study is to confirm the validity of this technology, which is why the study sets the following tasks: 1) to determine the validity criteria for the developed technology; 2) to show that the developed technology meets the validity criteria. An important result of this study is that it substantiated the criteria of the selected types of technology validity: construct, criterion, and content. The study proved that the developed technology met the criteria of validity, which was the main result. This allows recommending higher educational institution in Kazakhstan to implement this technology.
REFERENCES (38)
3.
Boccanfuso, D., Larouche, A., & Trandafir, M. (2015). Quality of higher education and the labor market in developing countries: Evidence from an education reform in Senegal. World Development, 74, 412-424.
4.
Brains, C. L., Willnat, L., Manheim, J. B., & Rich, R. (2011). Empirical Political Analysis. 8th edition. Boston: Longman.
7.
Ewell, P. (2010). Twenty years of quality assurance in higher education: what’s happened and what’s different? Quality in Higher Education, 16(2), 173-175.
8.
Gödel, K. (2010). Essays for His Centennial. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Groen, J. F. (2017). Engaging in Enhancement: Implications of Participatory Approaches in Higher Education Quality Assurance. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10, 89-100.
11.
Ingvarson, L., & Rowley, G. (2017). Quality assurance in teacher education and outcomes: A study of 17 countries. Educational Researcher, 46(4), 177-193.
12.
Kang, G. D. (2006). The hierarchical structure of service quality: integration of technical and functional quality. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 16(1), 37-50.
13.
Knapp, C. E. (2014). Place-based curricular and pedagogical models. Place-based education in a global age: Local diversity, 43-80.
14.
Laurillard, D. (2013). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. Routledge.
15.
McCarthy, G., Greatbanks, R., & Yang, J. B. (2002). Guidelines for assessing organisational performance against the EFQM Model of Excellence using the Radar Logic. Manchester School of Management.
16.
Melnikova, O. T. & Khoroshilov, D. A. (2014). Modern criterial systems of validity for qualitative studies in psychology. National Psychological Journal, 2(14).
17.
Minzhayeva, G. S. (2009). Developing, implementing, and improving quality management systems in higher educational institutions of Kazakhstan. Scientific and Practical Journal, 111.
18.
Nabi, Y. (2009). Тechnology of the Designing of a Quality Assurance System of Higher Education on the Basis of the EFQM Model. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 8, 316-321.
19.
Nabi, Y. (2013b). Тhe qualimetric approach to projecting internal system of quality assurance. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Educational Alternatives, 11.
20.
Nabi, Y. (2013c). Principles of design of a higher education quality assurance system based on the EFQM model. Collection of Research Papers SWorld. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Modern Directions in Theoretical and Applied Studies 2013” (pp. 3-9). Odessa: KUPRIENKO.
21.
Nabi, Y. (2013d). Results of education at a marketing approach. European Scientific Journal, 1.
22.
Nabi, Y. (2014a). Higher education quality assurance systems: Design based on the EFQM model. Monograph. Deutschland: Palmarium Academic Publishing.
23.
Nabi, Y. (2014b). Interdisciplinary Approach to the Design of a Quality Assurance System of Higher Education on the Basis of the EFQM Model. Advances in educational technologies. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Education and Modern Educational Technologies. Santorini Island, Greece.
24.
Nabi, Y. A. (2013a). The theory of design of a higher education quality assurance system based on the EFQM model. Monograph. Almaty: ROND&A, p. 127.
25.
Nabi, Y. A., & Mendigaliyeva, G. K. (2006). Pedagogical qualimetry as a foundation of assessment activities. Proceedings of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Kazakhstan (pp. 63-68).
26.
Nabi, Y. A., & Shaprova, G. G. (2010). Designing a computer graphics course as an independent discipline: Monograph. Almaty: Kazakh Leading Academy of Architecture and Civil Engineering Publishing House.
27.
Nabi, Y. A., Tokmagambetov, A.Sh., & Ibishev, U. Sh. (2012). The theoretical and methodological aspects of educational system desigm. Scientific Journal, 80.
30.
Safontsev, S. A., & Fedotova, O. D. (2014). Technologies for designing projects for psychology and pedagogy education. Monograph. Rostov-on-Don: Southern Federal University Publishing House, p. 168.
31.
Šedivý, J. (2013). Research of the deployment of tools of computer modeling for design and simulationsin technical education. International journal of education and information technologies, 4(7), 195-204.
32.
Semenova, K. V. (2010). A questionnaire for determining the innovation potential of pedagogical workers. Retrieved from openclass.ru›node/40382.
33.
State Program for the Development of Education in the Republic of Kazakhstan in 2011-2010. (2011). Retrieved from URL:<http://www.edu.gov.kz/ru/zakon....
34.
Stephenson, J., & Yorke, M. (Eds.). (2013). Capability and quality in higher education. Routledge.
35.
Tatar, E., & Oktay, M. (2006). Search, Choice and Persistence for Higher Education: A Case Study in Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2(2).
36.
Validation Dictionary of the English Language. (2011). 5th edition. USA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1305-8223 |
| ISSN: | 1305-8215 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
