RESEARCH PAPER
The development of an online STEM teacher professional development package with the DECODE model: An innovative teacher’s quality maintenance
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Jember, Jember, INDONESIA
 
2
Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, INDONESIA
 
 
Publication date: 2022-11-16
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2022;18(12):em2191
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Due to the global trend and the international application of STEM education as well as in/post pandemic COVID-19 condition, this ongoing study aims to elucidate the development progress of an online STEM teachers’ professional development (STEM-TPD) package with the DECODE model. In this/post-pandemic era, online STEM education has been gradually emphasized. The researchers sustained the rationale for organizing STEM-TPDs to improve teacher practices by enhancing superior knowledge needed for the betterment of STEM implementations. Indeed, the DECODE model includes three stages: (1) DE: teacher’s DEmonstrations, (2) CO: students CO-train the use of cloud classroom, students CO-design an educational technology-integrated course, and (3) DE: students CO-teach, eventually students receive feedbacks and DEbrief what they have learned through the stages mentioned above. Moreover, face and content validity have been deployed to guarantee the quality of the developed packages. The ongoing result from this study is produced to validate the online STEM-TPD package with the DECODE model. Moreover, the package comprises manual training, a set of assessments, and an innovative webpage. Through this online DECODE model with the package, teachers are equipped: to familiarize themselves with various software technology and platforms; enhance their knowledge and abilities in assessment design, instructional design, and practical implementation (TPACK); to effectively teach or guide students in STEM activities, and to effectively improve their STEM literacy.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Awad, N. A., Salman, E., & Barak, M. (2019). Integrating teachers to teach an interdisciplinary STEM-focused program about sound, waves and communication systems. European Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejste....
 
2.
Baran, E., Bilici, S. C., Mesutoglu, C., & Ocak, C. (2016). Moving STEM beyond schools: Students’ perceptions about an out-of-school STEM education program. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 4(1), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijems....
 
3.
Bautista, A., & Ortega-Ruíz, R. (2015). Teacher professional development: International perspectives and approaches. Psychology, Society and Education, 7(3), 240-251. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.....
 
4.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
 
5.
CAN. (2018). Assessment and planning tool for STEM in expanded learning programs. California AfterSchool Network. https://www.afterschoolnetwork....
 
6.
Cheng, P.-H., Molina, J., Lin, M.-C., Liu, H.-H., & Chang, C.-Y. (2022). A new TPACK training model for tackling the ongoing challenges of COVID-19. Applied System Innovation, 5(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi502....
 
7.
Chesky, N. Z., & Wolfmeyer, M. R. (2015). Philosophy of STEM education: A critical investigation. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978113....
 
8.
Chiu, T. K., Chai, C. S., Williams, P. J., & Lin, T.-J. (2021). Teacher professional development on self-determination theory-based design thinking in STEM education. Educational Technology and Society, 24(4), 153-165.
 
9.
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/004723....
 
10.
Fiser, P., Vogt, J., van-Braak, J., & Tondeur, Jo. (2015). Measuring and assessing TPACK (technological pedagogical content knowledge). In J. M. Spector, (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational technology (pp. 490-493). SAGE.
 
11.
Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers’ implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
12.
Irwanto, I., Redhana, W., & Wahono, B. (2022). Examining perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A perspective from Indonesian pre-service teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Indonesian Science Education Journal], 11(1), 142-154. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.....
 
13.
Kola, J. A. (2013). Importance of science education to national development and problems militating against its development. American Journal of Education Research, 1(7), 225-229. https://doi.org/10.12691/educa....
 
14.
Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez-González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799-822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21....
 
15.
Murtafiah, M., Sumantri, M. S., & Dhieni, N. (2022). Pembinaan berkelanjutan profesional guru PAUD melalui program microlearning dengan pendekatan TPACK (technological pedagogical content knowledge) dalam kurikulum bermain [Professional continuous development of PAUD teachers through the microlearning program with the TPACK (technological pedagogical content knowledge) approach in the play curriculum]. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai [Tambusai Education Journal], 6(2), 10112-10123.
 
16.
Niemi, H. (2015). Teacher professional development in Finland: Towards a more holistic approach. Psychology, Society and Education, 7(3), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.....
 
17.
Perry, E., & Booth, J. (2021). The practices of professional development facilitators. Professional Development in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/194152....
 
18.
Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., Roblin, N. P., Vanslambrouck, S., & Zhu, C. (2019). Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: A systematic meta-aggregative review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1145-1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423....
 
19.
Poortman, C. L., Brown, C., & Schildkamp, K. (2021). Professional learning networks: A conceptual model and research opportunities. Educational Research, 64(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/001318....
 
20.
Smith, A. (2018). Fundamentals to instructional design: The ADDIE model. https://www.td.org/user/conten....
 
21.
UNECE. (2015). TF-implementation guide-training manual. United Nations. https://tfig.unece.org/trainin....
 
22.
Utomo, A. P., Yuana, K., Narulita, E., Fikri, K., & Wahono, B. (2018). Students’ errors in solving science reasoning-domain of trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Indonesian Science Education Journal], 7(1), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.....
 
23.
Wahono, B., & Chang, C.-Y. (2019). Assessing teacher’s attitude, knowledge, and application (AKA) on STEM: An effort to foster the sustainable development of STEM education. Sustainability, 11(4), 950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1104....
 
24.
Wahono, B., Chang, C. Y., & Khuyen, N. T. T. (2021). Teaching socio-scientific issues through integrated STEM education: An effective practical averment from Indonesian science lesson. International Journal of Science Education, 43(16), 2663-2683. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
25.
Wahono, B., Narulita, E., Chang, C.-Y., Darmawan, E., & Irwanto, I. (2021). The role of students’ worldview on decision-making: An Indonesian case study by a socio-scientific issue-based instruction through integrated STEM education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 17(11), em2027. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
 
26.
Zhu, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Education in and after COVID-19: Immediate responses and long-term visions. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 695-699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top