RESEARCH PAPER
The effect of STEM problem-based learning on students’ mathematical problem-solving beliefs
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Mathematics & Computer Science Education, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, SOUTH AFRICA
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-07-25
 
 
Publication date: 2024-07-31
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(8):em2486
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to investigate the effect of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) problem-based learning (PBL) intervention on students’ problem-solving beliefs (PSB). To this end, the PSB questionnaire was administered to a group of eighty-six 10th graders across different socio-economic spectra working with an expert facilitator in a rural school that received curricular support and resources to specifically develop STEM teaching in eastern South Africa. The sample participated in two time periods (pre- vs. post-intervention) in which problem-based activities were utilized. A quantitative evaluation of the impact of an intervention on students’ subsequent beliefs as well as qualitative analysis of interviews with a sample of fourteen purposively selected students is presented. Results showed that participants increased their mathematical PSB (p<.001 , d=.50 ). The implications of these findings speak to the potential for teachers to utilize the results to provide opportunities for students to experience PBL activities.
 
REFERENCES (40)
1.
Bansilal, S., & Lephoto, T. (2022). Exploring particular learner factors associated with South African mathematics learners’ achievement: Gender gap or not. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 26(2), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/181172....
 
2.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/147808....
 
3.
Bruner, J. S. (1971). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
 
4.
Callejo, M. L., & Vila, A. (2009). Approach to mathematical problem-solving and students’ belief systems: Two case studies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
5.
Capraro, R. M. (2004). Statistical significance, effect size reporting, and confidence intervals: Best reporting strategies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 57-62. https://doi.org/10.2307/300348....
 
6.
Chen, L., Yoshimatsu, N., Goda, Y., Okubo, F., Taniguchi, Y., Oi, M., Konomi, S., Shimada, A., Ogata, H., & Yamada, M. (2019). Direction of collaborative problem-solving-based STEM learning by learning analytics approach. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039....
 
7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
8.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
 
9.
Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (2005). Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist, 60(2), 170-180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-0....
 
10.
DBE. (2009). The Dinaledi schools project: Report from a strategic engagement between the national department of education and business on increasing support for mathematics and science in education in schools. Department of Basic Education.
 
11.
Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty. Minton.
 
12.
Engeström, Y. (2012). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström (Ed.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978....
 
13.
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. Jossey-Bass.
 
14.
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman Mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324-326. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresem....
 
15.
Franz-Odendaal, T. A., Blotnicky, K., French, F., & Joy, P. (2016). Experiences and perceptions of STEM subjects, careers, and engagement in STEM activities among middle school students in the Maritime provinces. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 15(2), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/149261....
 
16.
Goldin, G., Rösken, B., & Törner, G. (2009). Beliefs–No longer a hidden variable in mathematical teaching and learning processes. In J. Maaß, & W. Schlöglmann (Eds.), Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education: New research results (pp. 9-28). Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/978908....
 
17.
Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K., & Ahn, J. B. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218-243. https://doi.org/10.3102/009173....
 
18.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR....
 
19.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognitive and Instruction, 26(1), 48-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/073700....
 
20.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Derry, S. J., Bitterman, A., & Hatrak, N. (2009). Targeting transfer in a STELLAR PBL course for preservice teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(2), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5....
 
21.
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
 
22.
Hung, W., Jonassen, D. H., & Liu, R. (2008). Problem-based learning. In J. M. Spector, J. G. van Merriënboer, M. D. Merrill, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 485-506). Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020....
 
23.
King, N. S. (2017). When teachers get it right: Voices of black girls’ informal STEM learning experiences. Journal of Multicultural Affairs, 2(1), Article 5.
 
24.
Kloosterman, P., & Stage, F. K. (2010). Measuring beliefs about mathematical problem-solving. School Science and Mathematics, 92(3), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949....
 
25.
Kwon, H., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2021). When I believe, I can: Success stems from my perceptions. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 21, 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330....
 
26.
Lemmon, D. K. (2017). An outcome evaluation of the Centre of Science and Technology [Unpublished dissertation]. University of Cape Town.
 
27.
Levine, M., Serio, N., Radaram, B., Chaudhuri, S., & Talbert, W. (2015). Addressing the STEM gender gap by designing and implementing an educational outreach chemistry camp for middle school girls. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(10), 1639-1644. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed5009....
 
28.
NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. National Council of Mathematics Teachers.
 
29.
Nilson, L. B. (2010). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors. Jossey-Bass.
 
30.
Pearson, G. (2017). National academies piece on integrated STEM. Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/002206....
 
31.
Prendergast, M., Breen, C., Bray, A., Faulkner, F., Carroll, B., Quinn, D., & Carr, M. (2018). Investigating secondary students beliefs about mathematical problem-solving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(8), 1203-1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
 
32.
Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168....
 
33.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem-solving. Academic Press.
 
34.
Severiens, S. E., & Schmidt, H. G. (2009). Academic and social integration and study progress in problem based learning. Higher Education, 58(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734....
 
35.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
 
36.
Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2014). Impacting positively on students’ mathematical problem-solving beliefs: An instructional intervention of short duration. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 8-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
 
37.
Sümen, Ö. Ö., & Çalışıcı, H. (2021). The effects of STEM activities applied in mathematics courses for elementary pre-service teachers in Turkey. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(12), 3352-3376. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
 
38.
Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081-1121. https://doi.org/10.3102/000283....
 
39.
Yew, E. H., & Goh, K. (2016). Problem-based learning: An overview of its process and impact on learning. Health Professions Education, 2, 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.....
 
40.
Young, M. V., House, A., Wang, H., Singleton, C., SRI International, & Klopfenstein, K. (2011). Inclusive STEM schools: Early promise in Texas and unanswered questions. National Academies. https://sites.nationalacademie....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top