10/2022 vol. 18
Stats
CC-BY 4.0
Get citation
RESEARCH PAPER
The effect of the activity-based approach on grade 11 learners’ performance in solving two-dimensional trigonometric problems
Kgaladi Maphutha 1
,
 
Satsope Maoto 1
,
 
Israel Kibirige 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, University of Limpopo, Sovenga, SOUTH AFRICA
 
 
Publication date: 2022-08-27
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2022;18(10):em2155
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12405
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (45)
 
KEYWORDS
activity-based approach
enjoyed
autonomy
traditional teaching approach
learners’
performance
 
ABSTRACT
The study explored the effect of the activity-based approach (ABA) on grade 11 learners’ performance in solving two-dimensional (2D) trigonometric problems. A sequential explanatory design was used, starting with the quantitative, followed by the qualitative method. The experimental group (EG) and the control group (CG) were facilitated using ABA, while CG was taught using traditional teaching approach. A 2D trigonometry test was used as a pre- and post-test to measure learners’ performance. EG’s experiences of using ABA were captured through focus group interviews. The study findings reveal significant differences between EG and CG post-tests [t(100)=.3. 95; p=.05] with Cohen d=.79. Also, ABA did not segregate between boys and girls. Despite ABA being time-consuming, learners in EG developed collaborative skills, trigonometry vocabulary, the ability to solve trigonometric problems, and learning autonomy, which improved their performance. The study recommends ABA to improve learners’ performance.
REFERENCES (45)
1.
Barai, B. (2018). A study on effectiveness of learning physical science through activity-based methods at secondary level in Alipurduar district of West Bengal. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 6(1), 289-294. http://doi.one/10.1729/IJCRT.1....
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ, 314(7080), 572. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.31....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., & Devers, K. J. (2007). Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research, 42(4), 1758-1772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Kluwer.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally & Company.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Celik, H. C. (2018). The effects of activity-based learning on sixth grade students’ achievement and attitudes towards mathematics activities. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1963-1977.https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
DBE. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement (CAPS) grades 10-12: Mathematics. Department of Basic Education.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
DBE. (2017). South African Schools Act (84/1996): Amended National Norms and Standards for School Funding. Government Gazette, 622(40818).
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
DBE. (2020). National senior certificate-diagnostic report. Department of Basic Education.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Deringol, Y., Ugurluel, M., & Eren, S. B. (2021). The effect of activity-based teaching approach on the attitudes of math-activities and their beliefs about mathematics of elementary school fourth graders. Acta Didactica Napocensia [Napocensia Didactic Act], 14(2), 284-298. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.1....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2013). An applied reference guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. SAGE.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Emaikwu, S. O. (2012). Assessing the relative effectiveness of the three teaching methods in the measurement of students’ achievement in mathematics. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3(4), 479-486. https://doi.org/10520/EJC12655....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Estes, C. A. (2004). Promoting student-centred learning in experiential education. Journal of Experiential Education, 27(2), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Kagenyi, D. G. (2016). Pedagogical factors affecting the learning of trigonometry [Doctoral dissertation, Kenyatta University].
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Kaur, H., & Sankhian, A. (2017). Effect of activity-based method on achievement motivation and academic achievement in mathematics at secondary level. Educational Quest: An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 8(2), 475-480. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-7....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2001). Designing and conducting focus group interviews. Social Analysis Selected Tools and Techniques, 36, 4-23.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: evidence-based inquiry. Pearson.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Mosese, N., & Ogbonnaya, U. I. (2021). GeoGebra and students’ learning achievement in trigonometric functions graphs representations and interpretations. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(2), 827-846. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/978141....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Ngcobo, A. Z., Madonsela, S. P., & Brijlall, D. (2019). The teaching and learning of trigonometry. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 72-91.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Noreen, R., & Rana, A. M. K. (2019). Activity-based teaching versus traditional method of teaching in mathematics at elementary level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(2), 145-159.
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Pokhrel, T. R. (2018). Activity-based mathematics instruction: Experiences in addressing the 21st-century skills. Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.26711/00757....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
Radford, L. (2008). Connecting theories in mathematics education: Challenges and possibilities. ZDM, 40(2), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Regmi, K. (2012). A review of teaching methods--Lecturing and facilitation in higher education (HE): A summary of the published evidence. Journal of Effective Teaching, 12(3), 61-76.
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Serpe, A., & Frassia, M. G. (2021). Artefacts teach-math. the meaning construction of trigonometric functions. Atti della Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti-Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali [Proceedings of the Peloritana Academy of Pericolanti-Class of Physical, Mathematical and Natural Sciences], 99(S1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1478/AAPP.9....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
Simons, M. D., & Wibawa, K. A. (2021). An ethnomethodological analysis of students’ understanding of the concept of trigonometry in a high-stakes examination in South Africa. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika [Journal of Tadris Mathematics], 14(2), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.20414/betaj....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
Spangenberg, E. D. (2021). Manifesting of pedagogical content knowledge on trigonometry in teachers’ practice. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(3), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(4), 268-275. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.3....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size-or why the p value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279-282. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Suter, W. N. (2011). Introduction to educational research: a critical thinking approach. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/978148....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioural research. SAGE.
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Usman, A. N., Musta’ámal, A. H., & Muhammad, H. A. (2020). Effects of place-based and activity-based approaches in technical education, interest and retention. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5A), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Warfield, V. M. (2006). Invitation to didactique. http://www.math.washington.edu.
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Wijaya, T. T., Ying, Z., & Purnama, A. (2020a). Using Hawgent dynamic mathematic software in teaching trigonometry. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(10), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Wijaya, T. T., Ying, Z., Cunhua, L., & Zulfah, Z. (2020b). Using VBA learning media to improve students’ mathematical understanding ability. Journal On Education, 2(3), 245-254. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., & Alavi, H. (2015). Design and implementation content validity study: Development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(5), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2....
CrossRef
 
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
Peer instruction’s Achilles’ heel: An analysis of its ineffectiveness in confronting counterintuitive physics questions
Doing mathematics with music – Creating epistemic environments
Assessing the impact of digital games-based learning on students’ performance in learning fractions using (ABACUS) software application
Learning first-year mathematics fully online: Were students prepared, how did they respond?
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top