RESEARCH PAPER
The interactive classroom: Integration of SMART notebook software in chemistry education
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Rwanda -College of Education, Rukara Campus, RWANDA
 
2
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, INDIA
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-07-04
 
 
Publication date: 2023-08-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2023;19(8):em2316
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The integration of SMART notebook software was one of the modifications to the teaching and learning environment since the post-coronavirus. Despite the extent of literature about the importance of this software to teaching and learning, there have been conflicting views and an overall lack of intervention in the Gambia regarding its importance in chemistry teaching and learning. Nevertheless, studies conducted about the impact of this software in the Gambia traditionally focused on evaluating regional examination results, where conceptual understanding of qualitative determination and quantitative study of acid-base reactions in the secondary school curriculum are continuous challenging for students. Further, these bodies of evaluation could not present support for the software on chemistry teaching, moreover, on the three domains namely recall, knowledge and application. On this basis, the purpose of the study was to investigate how interactive classrooms could support students’ learning the topics. Through quasi-experimental design and systematic random sampling technique, 314 students were selected and split into two independent groups, the treatment, and the control. The treatment group were taught using interactive learning objects in SMART notebook in conjunction with laboratory experimentation, while the control group mainly conventional teaching methods, including laboratory experimentations. After 24 days of parallel interventions, a non-parametric (Mann-Whitney U test mean rank) statistical test was conducted at a .05 level of significance. The results revealed that students in the treatment group had better knowledge retention and application than their peers in the control group as indicated by a significant difference (p=.001). These results align with the experimental literature and were particularly effective for developing alternate strategies for educating secondary students in chemistry class.
REFERENCES (53)
1.
Aktas, S., & Aydin, A. (2016). The effect of the smart board usage in science and technology lessons. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 64(3), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.....
 
2.
Akyol, S., & Fer, S. (2010). Effects of social constructivist learning environment design on 5th grade learners’ learning. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3(9), 948-953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsp....
 
3.
Aldosari, S. S., Ghita, B., & Marocco, D. (2022). A gestured-based educational system that integrates simulation and molecular visualization to teach chemistry. International Journal of Emerging Technology, 17(4), 192-211. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v....
 
4.
Anita, M. (2015). Effectiveness of smart classroom teaching on the achievement in the chemistry of secondary school students. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 9(2), 115-120. http://iasir.net/AIJRHASSpaper....
 
5.
Batdi, V. A. (2018). The effect of technology-supported teaching on students’ academic achievement. A combined meta-analytic and thematic study. International Journal of Learning Technology, 13(1), 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2....
 
6.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd edn.). SAGE.
 
7.
Davis, M. L., Witcraft, S. W. Baird, S. O., & Smits, J. A. J. (2017). The science of cognitive behavioral therapy. In S. G. Hofmann, & G. J. G. Asmundson (Eds.), Learning principles in CBT (pp. 51-76). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0....
 
8.
Dillon, J., & Avraamidou, L. (2021). It is time to rethink science education. Royal Society of Chemistry. https://edu.rsc.org/opinion/sc....
 
9.
Drechsler, M. (2007). Models in chemistry education: A study of teaching and learning acids and bases in Swedish upper secondary schools [PhD dissertation, Karlstad University]. https://www.diva-portal.org/sm....
 
10.
Education Research Center-Boston College Library. (2018). Smart board use in education: SMART notebook basic. https://libguides.bc.edu/c.php....
 
11.
Egelandsdal, K., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2017). Clickers and formative feedback at university lectures. Education Information Technology, 22(6), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639....
 
12.
Fagerland, M., W. (2012). T-test, non-parametric tests, and large studies–A paradox of statistical practice? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2....
 
13.
Goodman, R., Satterfield, R., & Waldech, R. (2013). Research on NJCTL programs. New Jersey Center for Teaching and Learning. https://njctl.org/who-we-are/r....
 
14.
Hinton, P. R., Brownlow, C., Mcmurray, I., & Cozens, B. (2004). SPSS explained. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020....
 
15.
HIR. (2014). Progressive science and mathematics initiative in the Gambia. World Bank. www.worldbank.org.
 
16.
HIR. (2018). Gambia program evaluation (WASSCE). World Bank. www.worldbank.org.
 
17.
Huh, K., & Lee, J. (2019). Fostering creativity and language skills of foreign language learners through SMART learning environments: evidence from fifth-grade Korean EFL learners. TESOL Journal, 11, 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.4....
 
18.
Igaro, K., Adjivon, A., & Ooyelakin, D. (2011). Adapting chemistry study in senior secondary schools in the Gambia to cost-reducing strategies. African Journal for Chemical Education, 1(2), 13-18. https://www.faschem.org/sites/....
 
19.
Jammeh, A. L. J., Karegeya, C., & Ladage, S. (In Press). Application of technological pedagogical content knowledge in smart classrooms: Views and its effect on students' performance in chemistry. Education and Information Technologies, Spinger Nature.
 
20.
Jammeh, A. L. J., Karegeya, C., Ladage, S. (2022). Chemistry lesson plan design and teaching: A case study of senior secondary schools in the urban regions of The Gambia. FWU Journal of Social Science Studies, 16(2), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.51709/19951....
 
21.
Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Jonhson, K. R., & Wojdynski, T. (2021). The impact of virtual reality mediation on college students’ exam performance. Smart Learning Environments, 8(21), 2-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561....
 
22.
Keller, L. S. (2018). Teachers' roles and identities in a student-centred classroom. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(34), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594....
 
23.
Kim, T., Cho, J. Y., & Lee, B. G. (2013). Evolution to smart learning in public education: A case study of Korean public education. In T. Ley, M. Ruohonen, M. Laanpere, & A. Tatnall (Eds.), Open social technology for networked learning (pp. 170-178). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
24.
Lemma, A. (2013). A diagnostic assessment of eighth-grade students and their teachers’ misconceptions about basic chemistry concepts. African Journal of Chemical Education, 3(1), 39-59. https://www.faschem.org/sites/....
 
25.
Li, Y. H., Su, C. Y., & Hu, Y. (2019). A sequential analysis of teaching behaviors toward the use of blackboard learning management system. In Proceedings of the International Conference E-Learning 2019. https://doi.org/10.33965/el201....
 
26.
Marchak, D., Shvarts, S. I., & Blonder, R. (2021). Teaching chemistry by a creative approach: Adapting a teacher course for active remote learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(2), 2809-2819. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
 
27.
Moussa, P. B., Ousman, G., Solomon, O., & Ryoko T. Y. X. (2020). Technology in the classroom and learning in secondary schools. Office of the Chief Economist & Education Global Practice. https://njctl.org/gambia-2020-....
 
28.
Muralidharan, K. (2015). Sample size determination in six sigma for organizational excellence. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81....
 
29.
Nichols, B. E. (2015). The interactive classroom. An overview of SMART notebook software. National Association for Music Education, 28(3), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/104837....
 
30.
Nitza, D., & Roman, Y. (2017). The effect of smart boards on the cognition and motivation of students. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 1925-4741. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7....
 
31.
Nurmukhamedova, D., Akramova, L., Buriev, I., Abdullaev, A., & Khonimkulova, F. (2021). Smart technologies in the process of preparing future teachers. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 48(8), 257-266. https://www.researchgate.net/p....
 
32.
Obumneke, E. (2012). How to analyze and interpret the LIKERT scale questionnaire using SPSSS. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=....
 
33.
Owens, T. H. (2012). Smart technologies in a technology classroom: Integration investigation of smart board & smart notebook into a 7-12 technology education classroom [Master’s thesis, State University of New York]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.1....
 
34.
Park, E. J., & Choi, K. (2013). Analysis of mathematics structure to identify students’ understanding of scientific concepts: pH value and scale. International of Science and Mathematic Education, 11(3), 683-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
 
35.
Patrich, E., M., & Julius, N. (2010). Mann-Whitney U test [Abstract]. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/978047....
 
36.
Phoong, S. Y., Phoong, S. W., Moghavvemi, S., & Sulaiman, A. (2019). Effect of smart classroom on student achievement in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(2), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/004723....
 
37.
Renan, S., & Tezcan, K. ( 2017). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on students’ achievement in science education. Turkish Journal of Education, 6(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje....
 
38.
Rosmansyah, Y., Putro, B. L., Putri, A., Utomo, N. B., & Suhardi (2022). A simple model of a smart learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/104948....
 
39.
Russell, J., & Person S. (2017). Tailoring clicker technology to problem-based learning: What is the best approach? Journal of Chemical Education, 94(12), 1866-1872. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
 
40.
Sadykov, T., & Čtrnáctová, H. (2019). Application interactive methods and technologies of teaching chemistry. Chemistry Teacher International. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-20....
 
41.
Sari, U., & Guven, B. (2013). The effect of interactive whiteboard supported inquiry-based learning on achievement and motivation in physics and views of prospective teachers toward the instruction. Semantic Scholar, 7(2), 110-143. https://doi.org/10.12973/nefme....
 
42.
Schmid, E. C. (2008). Using a voting system in conjunction with interactive whiteboard technology enhances learning in English language classrooms. Computer and Education, 50(3), 338-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
43.
Sharma, H. L. (2016). Effectiveness of EDUCOMP smart classroom teaching on achievement in mathematics at the elementary level. International Journal of Applied Research, 2(6), 683-687. https://www.allresearchjournal....
 
44.
Skibinski, E. S., DeBenedetti, W. J., Ortoll-Bloch, A. G., & Hines, M. A. (2015). A blackboard for the 21st century: An inexpensive light board projection system for classroom use. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(10), 1754-1756. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jc....
 
45.
SMART Tech. (2014). Quick facts and stats. https://smarttech.com/About+SM....
 
46.
Takawale, N., N. & Kulkarni, S., M. (2016). Effectiveness of smart classroom over traditional classroom in terms of academic achievement of students using statistical method. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 4(2), 2048-2052. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRC....
 
47.
Tal, M., Herskovitz, O., & Judy-Dori, Y. (2021). Assessing teachers’ knowledge: Incorporating context-based learning in chemistry. Chemistry Education and Practices, 22(4), 1003-1019. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00....
 
48.
Talan, T. (2021). The effect of computer-supported collaborative learning on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 9(3), 426-448. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijems....
 
49.
Tomita, R., & Savrimootoo, T. (n. d.). Improving education performance in math and science in the Gambia. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org.
 
50.
Tunesi, L. (2020). Explainer: What the pH scale tells us. Science New for Students. https://www.sciencenewsforstud....
 
51.
WAEC. (2019). Chief examiner’s report on regional examinations results. WASSCE. https://www.waecgambia.org/.
 
52.
Yitbareh, S. (2011). Chemical reaction: Diagnostic and towards the remedy of misconceptions. African Journal of Chemical Education, 1(1), 10-28. https://www.faschem.org/sites/....
 
53.
Zhu, Z., Sun, Y., & Riezebos, P. (2016). Introducing the smart education framework: Core elements for successful learning in a digital world. International Journal of Smart Technology and Learning, 1(1), 53-78. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsmar....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top