RESEARCH PAPER
Unpacking pre-service teachers’ conceptualization of logarithmic differentiation through the APOS theory
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, SOUTH AFRICA
Online publication date: 2024-11-26
Publication date: 2024-12-01
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(12):em2541
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Logarithmic differentiation is an effective method that aids the process of finding the derivatives
of complex exponential functions. However, there has been a scarcity of studies, particularly in the
South African context, that have provided evidence on pre-service mathematics teachers’
understanding of the concept of logarithmic differentiation. This study explored pre-service
teachers’ conceptualization of logarithmic differentiation through action-process-object-schema
(APOS) theory. We employed a qualitative case study design involving 90 first-year pre-service
teachers enrolled in a mathematics teacher education program at a university in South Africa’s
Eastern Cape Province. Overall, the analysis showed that 63.9% of the participants demonstrated
a substantial understanding of logarithmic differentiation processes, including 46.1% who had
reached the schema stage. Nonetheless, common misconceptions and errors persisted,
particularly among those who operated at action and beginning process stages. Errors and
misconceptions such as the misapplication of differentiation rules, calculation errors in combining
derivatives, and conceptual misunderstanding were evident. These findings highlight the need for
mathematics teacher preparation programs to emphasize both conceptual and procedural
understanding of differentiation. Achieving this goal may involve targeted instruction on relevant
foundational concepts, continuous professional development, and integration of active learning
strategies, such as the activities, classroom discussions, and exercises (ACE) teaching cycles to
address common misconceptions.
REFERENCES (49)
1.
Abakah, F., & Brijlall, D. (2024). Investigating how the activity, classroom discussion, and exercise (ACE) teaching cycle influences learners’ problem-solving and achievement in circle geometry. In F. Kamalov, R. Sivaraj, & H. H. Leung (Eds.), Advances in mathematical modeling and scientific computing. trends in mathematics (pp. 929-938). Birkhäuser.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
2.
Alam, A. (2020). Challenges and possibilities in teaching and learning of calculus: A case study of India. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 407-433.
https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys....
3.
Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktaç, A., Roa Fuentes, S., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS theory. Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-....
4.
Balachandran, K. (2023). Fractional integrals and derivatives. In K. Balachandran (Ed.), An introduction to fractional differential equations. industrial and applied mathematics (pp. 143-157). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98....
5.
Borji, V., Alamolhodaei, H., & Radmehr, F. (2018). Application of the APOS-ACE theory to improve students’ graphical understanding of derivative. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2947-2967.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
6.
Brannen, N. S., & Ford, B. (2004). Logarithmic differentiation: Two wrongs make a right. The College Mathematics Journal, 35(5), 388-390.
https://doi.org/10.2307/414685....
8.
Cangelosi, R., Madrid, S., Cooper, S., Olson, J., & Hartter, B. (2013). The negative sign and exponential expressions: Unveiling students’ persistent errors and misconceptions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(1), 69-82.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
9.
Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., & Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process scheme. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(2), 167-192.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-....
10.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
11.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th Ed.). SAGE.
12.
DBE. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement: Mathematics grades 10-12. Department of Basic Education.
13.
Díaz-Berrios, T., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2022). High school student understanding of exponential and logarithmic functions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, Article 100953.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
14.
Dubinsky, E. (1984). The cognitive effect of computer experiences on learning abstract mathematical concepts. Korkeak Atk-Uutiset, 2, 41-47.
15.
Dubinsky, E. (2014). Actions, processes, objects, schemas (APOS) in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 8-11). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
16.
Feudel, F., & Biehler, R. (2022). Students’ understanding of the economic interpretation of the derivative in the context of marginal cost. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 8(3), 437-468.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753....
17.
Jones, S. R. (2017). An exploratory study on student understandings of derivatives in real-world, non-kinematics contexts. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 45, 95-110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
18.
Koyunkaya, M. Y., & Boz-Yaman, B. (2023). Changes in students’ mental constructions of function transformations through the APOS framework. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(4), Article em0747.
https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme....
19.
Listiawati, E., Juniati, D., & Ekawati, R. (2023). Mathematics pre-service teachers’ understanding of derivative concepts using APOS theory related to mathematic anxiety: A case study. In P. W. Prasetyo, B. Arif, D. E. Wijayanti, A. Hendroanto, A. Istiandaru, & Rusmining (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Ahmad Dahlan International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education 2021 (p. 030015). AIP Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0140....
20.
Luneta, K., & Makonye, P. J. (2010). Learner errors and misconceptions in elementary analysis: A case study of a grade 12 class in South Africa. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 3(3), 35-46.
21.
Maciejewski, W. (2023). Flexibility of differentiation procedures in calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology.
https://doi.org/10.1080/002073....
22.
Maharaj, A. (2013). An APOS analysis of natural science students’ understanding of derivatives. South African Journal of Education, 33(1), 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.....
23.
Mkhatshwa, T. P. (2018). Business calculus students’ interpretations of marginal change in economic contexts. In T. E. Hodges, G. J. Roy, & A. M. Tyminski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 564-571). International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
24.
Mkhatshwa, T. P. (2020). Calculus students’ quantitative reasoning in the context of solving related rates of change problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 22(2), 139-161.
https://doi.org/10.1080/109860....
25.
Mkhatshwa, T. P. (2023). Calculus instructors’ perspectives on effective instructional approaches in the teaching of related rates problems. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), Article em2346.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
26.
Mkhatshwa, T. P. (2024). Best practices for teaching the concept of the derivative: Lessons from experienced calculus instructors. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), Article em2426.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
27.
Moru, E. K. (2020). An APOS analysis of university students’ understanding of derivatives: A Lesotho case study. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24(2), 279-292.
https://doi.org/10.1080/181172....
28.
Mukuka, A., & Alex, J. K. (2024a). Foundational mathematical knowledge of prospective teachers: Evidence from a professional development training. Pythagoras, 45(1), Article a764.
https://doi.org/10.4102/pythag....
29.
Mukuka, A., & Alex, J. K. (2024b). Student teachers’ knowledge of school-level geometry: Implications for teaching and learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(3), 1375-1389.
https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-je....
30.
Mullan, E. C. K., Chambers, C., & Westwood, P. (2015). Maths in action: Advanced higher mathematics. Oxford University Press.
31.
Mutambara, L., & Bansilal, S. (2019). An exploratory study on the understanding of the vector subspace concept. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 23(1), 14-26.
https://doi.org/10.1080/181172....
32.
Nabie, M. J., Akayuure, P., Ibrahim-Bariham, U. A., & Sofo, S. (2018). Trigonometric concepts: Pre-service teachers’ perceptions and knowledge. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 169-182.
https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9....
33.
Naidoo, K., & Naidoo, R. (2007). First year students understanding of elementary concepts in differential calculus in a computer laboratory teaching environment. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 4(9), 99-114.
https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v....
34.
Ngcobo, A. Z., Madonsela, S. P., & Brijlall, D. (2019). The teaching and learning of trigonometry. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 72-91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln....
35.
Okoye-Ogbalu, I., & Nnadozie, V. (2024). Subject competency and teacher knowledge: An exploration of second-year pre-service mathematics teachers’ difficulties in solving logarithmic problems using basic rules for logarithm. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 4(1), Article em054.
https://doi.org/10.29333/maths....
37.
Othman, Z. S. B., Khalid, A. K. Bin, & Mahat, A. B. (2018). Students’ common mistakes in basic differentiation topics. In D. Mohamad, A. B. Akbarally, H. Maidinsah, M. M. Jaffa, M. Mohamed, S. R. Sharif, & W. Z. A. Rahman (Eds.), Proceeding of the 25th National Symposium on Mathematical Sciences: Mathematical Sciences as the Core of Intellectual Excellence (p. 050009). AIP Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5041....
38.
Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge: An essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes. University of Chicago Press.
39.
Sánchez-Matamoros, G., Fernández, C., & Llinares, S. (2015). Developing pre-service teachers’ noticing of students’ understanding of the derivative concept. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1305-1329.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....
40.
Siyepu, S. W. (2013). An exploration of students’ errors in derivatives in a university of technology. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 577-592.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
41.
Siyepu, S. W. (2015). Analysis of errors in derivatives of trigonometric functions. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), Article 16.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594....
42.
Strang, G., & Herman, J. E. (2016). Calculus volume 1. OpenStax.
43.
Tatira, B. (2021). Mathematics education students’ understanding of binomial series expansion based on the APOS theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), Article em2035.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
44.
Tatira, B. (2023). Undergraduate students’ conceptualization of elementary row operations in solving systems of linear equations. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), Article em2349.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmst....
45.
Thompson, P. W., & Harel, G. (2021). Ideas foundational to calculus learning and their links to students’ difficulties. ZDM- Mathematics Education, 53(3), 507-519.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
46.
Törner, G., Potari, D., & Zachariades, T. (2014). Calculus in European classrooms: Curriculum and teaching in different educational and cultural contexts. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 46(4), 549-560.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858....
47.
Walsh, R., Fitzmaurice, O., & O’Donoghue, J. (2017). What subject matter knowledge do second-level teachers need to know to teach trigonometry? An exploration and case study. Irish Educational Studies, 36(3), 273-306.
https://doi.org/10.1080/033233....
48.
Wille, A. M. (2017). Conceptions of the transition from the difference quotient to the derivative in imaginary dialogues written by pre-service teachers. In T. Dooley, & G. Gueudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1396-1403). DCU Institute of Education and ERME.
49.
Wille, A. M. (2020). Activity with signs and speaking about it: Exploring students’ mathematical lines of thought regarding the derivative. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8), 1587-1611.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763....