RESEARCH PAPER
Using hands-on learning video assignments in online and in-person contexts: A longitudinal study
 
More details
Hide details
1
College of Teacher Education, Northwest Normal University, Anning District, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, CHINA
 
2
Faculty of Teacher Education, Shanxi Normal University, Xiaodian District, Taiyuan, Shanxi, CHINA
 
3
Department of Learning and Instruction, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-06-11
 
 
Publication date: 2024-07-01
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2024;20(7):em2466
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study investigated the use of hands-on learning video assignments (HLVAs) among middle school students in China during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on the results of HLVAs approach with seventh grade students at Jiefang Road School during the online learning phase, one class was selected to participate in an offline empirical, longitudinal study to further explore the impact of HLVAs approach on students’ biology learning. Two data collection instruments were used: hands-on learning students’ work evaluation instrument and model competence development instrument to detect changes in students’ modeling development. Questionnaire responses from the students in the experimental class two years later, when they were in high school, offer additional perspectives on this approach. Findings indicated that HLVAs approach improves students’ work quality, modeling skills, and biology learning outcomes. This study describes hands-on learning strategy based on embodied cognition theoretical perspectives, with implications for curriculum, instruction, and learning.
REFERENCES (88)
1.
Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2018). Embodied cognition in learning and teaching: Action, observation, and imagination. In F. Fischer, S. Goldman, C. Hmelo-Silver, & P. Riemann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 75-85). Routledge/Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131....
 
2.
Asim, S., & Hollenbeck, J. E. (2021). Lessons learned from facilitating inquiry-based science online teaching: Challenges and opportunities to science education during the COVID-19 pandemic. In V. L. Akerson, & I. S. Carter (Eds.), Science education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Tales from the front lines (pp. 5-34). ISTES Organization.
 
3.
Ates, O., & Eryilmaz, A. (2011). Effectiveness of hands-on and minds-on activities on students’ achievement and attitudes towards physics. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 6.
 
4.
Barsalou, L. W. (2016). On staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1122-1142. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423....
 
5.
Bigler, A., & Hanegan, N. L. (2010). Student content knowledge increases after participation in a hands-on biotechnology intervention. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(3), 246-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956....
 
6.
Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Susan Fauer Company. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/1002....
 
7.
Breslyn, W., & Green, A. E. (2022b). Learning science with YouTube videos and the impacts of COVID-19. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031....
 
8.
Bryce, C. M., Baliga, V. B., De Nesnera, K. L., Fiack, D., Goetz, K. T., Tarjan, L. M., Wade, C. E., Yovovich, V., Baumgart, S., Bard, D., Ash, D., Parker, I. M., & Gilbert, G. S. (2016). Exploring models in the biology classroom. American Biology Teacher, 78(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.20....
 
9.
CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org.
 
10.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2014). Learning from observing hands in static and animated versions of non-manipulative tasks. Learning and Instruction, 34, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lear....
 
11.
Chen, J. C., Huang, Y. W., Lin, K. Y., Chang, Y. S., Lin, H. C., Lin, C. Y., & Hsiao, H. S. (2019). Developing a hands-on activity using virtual reality to help students learn by doing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.1....
 
12.
Crawford, A. J., Butler-Henderson, A. K., Jurgen, R., Malkawi, H. B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, A. P., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.....
 
13.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2020). Mobile learning and pedagogical opportunities: A configurative systematic review of PreK-12 research using the SAMR framework. Computers & Education, 156, 103945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
14.
Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. University of Chicago Press.
 
15.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. MacMillan.
 
16.
Dewey, J. (1938). The later works of John Dewey, volume 12, 1925-1953: 1938, logic: The theory of inquiry. SIU Press.
 
17.
Duan, X. Y. (2021). The influence of hands-on learning on the modeling ability of junior high school students——based on the analysis of biology online and offline teaching practice. https://doi.org/10.27287/d.cnk....
 
18.
Flick, L. B. (1993). The meanings of hands-on science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 4(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0262....
 
19.
Foglia, L., & Wilson, R. A. (2013). Embodied cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(3), 319-325. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.12....
 
20.
Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019927....
 
21.
Giannakos, M. N., Krogstie, J., & Aalberg, T. (2015). Toward a learning ecosystem to support flipped Classroom: A conceptual framework and early results. In Lecture notes in educational technology (pp. 105-114). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98....
 
22.
Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert, & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 3-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
 
23.
Gorhan, M. F., Oncu, S., & Senturk, A. (2014). Tablets in education: Outcome expectancy and anxiety of middle school students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(6), 2259-2271.
 
24.
Gregorcic, B., & Haglund, J. (2018b). Conceptual blending as an interpretive lens for student engagement with technology: Exploring celestial motion on an interactive whiteboard. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 235-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
25.
Halloun, I. A. (2006). Mediated modeling in science education. Science & Education, 16(7-8), 653-697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191....
 
26.
Haury, D. L., & Rillero, P. (1994). Perspectives of hands-on science teaching. ERIC Clearing House for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fullt....
 
27.
Haβler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2015). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.1....
 
28.
Henze, I., & van Driel, J. H. (2011). Science teachers’ knowledge about learning and teaching models and modeling in public understanding of science. In M. Khine, & I. Saleh (Eds.), Models and modeling: Models and modeling in science education (pp. 239-261). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
 
29.
Hirca, N. (2013). The influence of hands on physics experiments on scientific process skills according to prospective teachers’ experiences. European Journal of Physics Education, 4(1), 1-9.
 
30.
Hodges, C. B., Moore, S. L., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educase. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/....
 
31.
Hollenbeck, J. E. (2021). Taking the traditionally taught classroom to the inquiry-based online. https://elib.bsu.by/bitstream/....
 
32.
Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2009). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in Science Education, 40(5), 743-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
33.
Hong, J., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhao, L. (2021). High school students’ online learning ineffectiveness in experimental courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
 
34.
Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Learning to feel like a scientist. Science Education, 100(2), 189-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21....
 
35.
Jazwa, K. A. (2017). Hands-on learning for classics: Building an effective, long-term project. The Journal of Classics Teaching, 18(36), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1017/s20586....
 
36.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Science teachers’ knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1273-1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006....
 
37.
Kemmerer, D., Miller, L., MacPherson, M. K., Huber, J., & Tranel, D. (2013). An investigation of semantic similarity judgments about action and non-action verbs in Parkinson’s disease: Implications for the embodied cognition framework. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.....
 
38.
Kibga, E., Sentongo, J., & Gakuba, E. (2021). Effectiveness of hands-on activities to develop chemistry learners curiosity in community secondary schools in Tanzania. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 605-621. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused....
 
39.
Kim, B., Pathak, S. A., Jacobson, M. J., Zhang, B., & Gobert, J. D. (2015). Cycles of exploration, reflection, and consolidation in model-based learning of genetics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 789-802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956....
 
40.
Klahr, D., Triona, L. M., & Williams, C. (2007). Hands on what? The relative effectiveness of physical versus virtual materials in an engineering design project by middle school children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20....
 
41.
Kontra, C., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Embodied learning across the life span. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 731-739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756....
 
42.
Krell, M., Belzen, A. U. Z., & Krüger, D. (2013). Students’ levels of understanding models and modelling in Biology: Global or aspect-dependent? Research in Science Education, 44(1), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
43.
Kurtz, H. (2020). National survey tracks impact of coronavirus on schools: 10 key findings. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/ew/arti....
 
44.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books.
 
45.
Liu, X. (2006). Effects of combined hands-on laboratory and computer modeling on student learning of gas laws: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956....
 
46.
Lombard, F., & Costa, D. J., & Weiss, L. (2023). Teaching with digital biology: Opportunities from authentic sequences and 3D models. Progress in Science Education, 6(1), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.25321/prise....
 
47.
Louca, L. Τ., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Modeling-based learning in science education: Cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions. Educational Review, 64(4), 471-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/001319....
 
48.
Lumpe, A. T., & Oliver, J. S. (1991). Dimensions of hands-on science. The American Biology Teacher, 53(6), 345-348. https://doi.org/10.2307/444932....
 
49.
Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006b). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), 7. https://doi.org/10.1145/113296....
 
50.
Macrine, S. L., & Fugate, J. M. (2022). Movement matters: How embodied cognition informs teaching and learning. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpre....
 
51.
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1-3), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphy....
 
52.
Malone, K., Schunn, C. D., & Schuchardt, A. (2017). Improving conceptual understanding and representation skills through excel-based modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(1), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956....
 
53.
Mang, C. F., & Wardley, L. J. (2013). Student perceptions of using tablet technology in postsecondary classes. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.21432/t2201....
 
54.
MoE. (2022). Biology curriculum standards for compulsory education. Beijing Normal University Press.
 
55.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
 
56.
NSTA. (2016). Position statement of e-learning in science education. National Science Teaching Association. https://www.nsta.org/nstas-off....
 
57.
Pirttimaa, M., Husu, J., & Metsärinne, M. (2015). Uncovering procedural knowledge in craft, design, and technology education: A case of hands-on activities in electronics. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(2), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798....
 
58.
Prokop, P., & Fančovičová, J. (2016). The effect of hands-on activities on children’s knowledge and disgust for animals. Journal of Biological Education, 51(3), 305-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/002192....
 
59.
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Ortiz, L. G., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438....
 
60.
Rowlands, M. J. (2013). The new science of the mind: From extended mind to embodied phenomenology. National Geographic Books.
 
61.
Ruby, A. (2001). Hands-on science and student achievement [Dissertation, RAND Graduate School].
 
62.
Schneider, K. D. (2016). Hands-on learning: Some history and some principles. University of Geneva. https://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/t....
 
63.
Sekulich, K. M. (2020). Developing an online community of learners. Delta Kappa Gamma. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/g....
 
64.
Shapiro, L. A. (2014). The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131....
 
65.
Shavelson, R. J. & Towne, L. (2002). Scientific research in education. National Academy Press.
 
66.
Stauffer, B. (2020). What’s the difference between online learning and distance learning? Applied Educational Systems.
 
67.
Steinbuch, K. (1977). Denken in modellen [Thinking in models]. In G. Schaefer, G. Trommer, & K. Wenk (Eds.), Denken in modellen [Thinking in models] (pp. 10-17). Westermann.
 
68.
Sullivan, J. V. (2018). Learning and embodied cognition: A review and proposal. Psychology, Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/147572....
 
69.
Taber, K. S. (2017). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
70.
Tancredi, S., Chen, R. S. Y., Krause, C. M., & Siu, Y. (2022b). The need for SpEED: Reimagining accessibility through special education embodied design. In S. L. Macrine, & J. M. B. Fugate (Eds.), Movement matters: How embodies cognition informs teaching and learning (pp. 197-216). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpre....
 
71.
Tao, X. Z. (1981). Education transformation in China. Anhui Renmin Press.
 
72.
Triona, L. M., & Klahr, D. (2007). Hands-on science: Does it matter what students’ hands are on? The Science Education Review, 6(4), 126-130.
 
73.
Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189-199.
 
74.
Upmeier zu Belzen, A. (2013). Modelle [Models]. In H. Großengießer, U. Harms, & U. Kattmann (Eds.), Fachdidaktik biologie [Biology education] (pp. 325-334). Aulis Verlag.
 
75.
Upmeier zu Belzen, A., & Krüger, D. (2010). Model competence in biology education. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften [Journal for Didactics of Natural Sciences], 16, 41-57.
 
76.
Uribe, C. (2020). Education in the time of COVID-19. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark....
 
77.
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpre....
 
78.
Wang, Y. J., Lee, S. W. Y., Liu, C., Lin, P. C., & Chen, W. (2021). Investigating the links between students’ learning engagement and modeling competence in computer-supported modeling-based activities. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(6), 751-765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956....
 
79.
Werner, S., Förtsch, C., Boone, W. J., Von Kotzebue, L., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2017). Investigating how German biology teachers use three-dimensional physical models in classroom instruction: A video study. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 437-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165....
 
80.
WHO. (2023). Statement on the 15th Meeting of the IHR (2005) Emergency Committee on the COVID-19 Pandemic. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news/item/....
 
81.
Wilkinson, K., & Barter, P. (2016). Do mobile learning devices enhance learning in higher education anatomy classrooms? Journal of Pedagogic Development, 6(1), 14-23.
 
82.
Wisanti, Ambawati, R., Putri, E., Rahayu, D. A., & Khaleyla, F. (2021). Science online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Difficulties and challenges. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747, 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6....
 
83.
Yang, Q., Huo, J., & Yang, S. Y. (2020). Development of biological model evaluation scale in the senior high school. Teaching and Administration, 1, 59-61.
 
84.
Yengin, I., Karahoca, D., Karahoca, A., & Yucel, A. (2010). Roles of teachers in e-learning: How to engage students & how to get free e-learning and the future. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5775-5787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsp....
 
85.
Yildiz, N. (2014). The effect of hands-on-activities in biology on student performance and attitude. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Future of Education.
 
86.
Zhang, R. H., Duan, X. Y., Hua, Y. P., & Ji, Q. Q. (2021). The compilation of the evaluation scale of hands-on learning works from the perspective of embodied cognition. Biology Teaching, 46(4), 27-29. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn....
 
87.
Zhou, Y., & Xiang, M. (2010). Tao xingzhi chuan. Sichuan Education Press.
 
88.
Zona, C. I., Raab, M., & Fischer, M. H. (2018). Embodied perspectives on behavioral cognitive enhancement. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 3(2), 144-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top