11/2017 vol. 13
Stats
CC-BY 4.0
Get citation
RESEARCH PAPER
Visualizing the Concept Images of Students on Numbers with Combined SOM-Ward Clustering Analysis
Deniz Kaya 1
,
 
Gökçe Ok 2
,
 
Cenk Keşan 3
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Ministry of National Education, Izmir, TURKEY
 
2
Public Administration Institute for Turkey and Middle East, Ankara, TURKEY
 
3
Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Education, Izmir, TURKEY
 
 
Online publication date: 2017-11-08
 
 
Publication date: 2017-11-08
 
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(11):7503-7516
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80008
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (55)
 
KEYWORDS
concept images
number
self-organizing map (SOM)
Ward clustering analysis
 
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the study is to perform a less-dimensional visualization process for the purpose of determining the images of the students on the concept of number. The Ward clustering analysis combined with the self-organizing map (SOM) was used for this purpose. The conceptual understanding tool, which consisted of the open-ended question “write the first ten things you remember when the term number is mentioned” to the study group, which consisted of 212 fifth grade students. The analysis results showed that students mostly explained the concept of number by associating with mathematics and other sciences with the terms like “addition, subtraction, division, multiplication, fraction, share, equation, cluster, angle, square, rectangle, plus, minus, shape, operation, step, graphics, value, equal, equals”, which are related with “operations-calculations” and “mathematical terms”. The students mostly established relations with mathematical side of the number. At the end of the study, the dataset obtained from the conceptual understanding tool was used for training the SOM, and a visualization approach that revealed the images of the students on number concept was recommended.
REFERENCES (55)
1.
Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Altiparmak, K., & Özdoğan, E. (2010) A study on the teaching of the concept of negative numbers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(1), 31-47.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Artut, P. D., & Tarım, K. (2006). Elementary students’ comprehension of place value concept. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 2(1), 26-36.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Asworth, P., & Lucas, U. (1998). What is ‘world’ of phenomenography? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 415-431.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Barnard, A. D., & Tall, D. O. (1997). Cognitive units, connections, and mathematical proof. In E. Pehkonen, (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21’ Annual Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2 (pp. 41-48). Lahti, Finland.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Bingolbali, E., & Monaghan, J. (2008). Concept image revisited. Educ Stud Math, 68(1), 19-35.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Brannon, E. M., & Van de Walle, G. A. (2001). The development of ordinal numerical competence in young children. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 53-81.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Bruno, A., & Martinon, A. (1999). The teaching of numerical extensions: The case of negative numbers. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol, 30(6), 789-809.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Butterworth, B. (2005). The development of arithmetical abilities. Journal of Child Psychol Psychiatry, 46(1), 3-18.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Cabanes, G., Bennani, Y., & Fresneau, D. (2012). Enriched topological learning for cluster detection and visualization. Neural Networks, 32(1), 186-195.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Carey, S. E. (2004). Bootstrapping & the origin of concepts. Daedalus, 133(1), 59-68.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Chatfield. C., & Collins. A. J. (1980). Introduction to multivariate analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Dedekind, R. (1963). Essays on the theory of numbers. New York: Dover Publications.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Elmas, Ç. (2016). Yapay zekâ uygulamaları [Artificial intelligence applications]. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Entwistle, N. (1997). Introduction: Phenomenography in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 127-158.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Eurydice (2011). Mathematics education in Europe: Common challenges and national policies. Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Flexer, A. (2001). On the use of self-organizing maps for clustering and visualization. Intelligent Data Analysis, 5(5), 373-384.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Geary, D. C. (1994). Children’s mathematical development: Research and practical applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Gelman, R., & Meck, E. (1983). Preschooler’s counting: Principles before skill. Cognition, 13(3), 343-359.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Giraldo, V., Tall, D., & Carvalho, L. M. (2003). Usıng theoretical-computational conflicts to enrich the concept image of derivative. Research in Mathematics Education, 5(1), 63-78.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Habegger, L. (2010). Number concept and rhythmic response in early childhood. Music Education Research, 12(3), 269-280.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Haykin, S. (1994). Neural networks: A Comprehensive foundation. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Herbert, J. P., & Yao, J. T. (2009). A granular computing framework for self-organizing maps. Neurocomputing, 72(13-15), 2865-2872.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Kohonen, T. (2001). Self-organizing maps. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Kohonen, T., Kaski, S., Lagus, K., Salojarvi, J., Honkela, J., Paatero, V., & Saarela, A. (2000). Self organization of a massive document collection. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 11(3), 574-585.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Kulkarni, A. D. (1994). Artificial neural network for image understanding. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Martin, M.O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Marton, F. (1994). Phenomenography. In T. Husen, and N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 4424-4429). Oxford: Pergamon.
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
Martorella, P. H. (1991). Knowledge and concept development in social Development. Handbook of research on Social Studies. In. R. S. James (Eds.), Studies teaching and learning (pp.370-384). New York: MacMillan.
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5(4), 115-133.
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2013). Ortaokul matematik dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Secondary mathematics book (5, 6, 7 and 8. class) programme of teaching]. Ankara: MEB.
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
Nabiyev, V. V. (2016). Yapay zekâ [Artificial intelligence]. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) (2006). Civics 2006: The Nation’s report card. Retrieved from http://nationsreportcare.gov/c....
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2006). Curriculum focal points. Reston, VA: Author.
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
Nordlander, M. C., & Nordlander, E. (2012) On the concept image of complex numbers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(5), 627-641.
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
Olkun, S., & Toluk, Z. (2003). İlköğretimde etkinlik temelli matematik öğretimi [Activity based mathematics teaching in primary education]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
Olkun, S., Fidan, E., & Özer, A. B. (2013). The development of number concept and the use of counting in problem solving of 5-7 year olds. Education and Science, 38(169), 236-248.
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world–first results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/1....
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2016). PISA 2015 results in focus. OECD, Paris. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/.
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
Rogers, J. P. (2008) Cardinal number and its representation: skills, concepts and contexts. Early Child Development and Care, 178(2), 211-225.
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
Sharma, S. S. (1996). Applied multivariate techiques. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
Siegler, R. S. (1991). Children’s thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept defi¬nition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151-169.
Google Scholar
 
 
47.
Tossavainen, T., Attorps, I., & Väisänen, P. (2012). Some south african mathematics teachers’ concept images of the equation concept. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(3), 376-389.
Google Scholar
 
 
48.
Trigwell, K. (2006). Phenomenography: An approach to researh into geography education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30(2), 367-372.
Google Scholar
 
 
49.
Trovato, L. M. (2013). Developing number concepts. Childhood Education, 37(5), 226-229.
Google Scholar
 
 
50.
Van De Walle, J. A. (2004). Elementary and middle school mathematics. Teaching developmentally. Boston: Pearson Education/Allyn & Bacon.
Google Scholar
 
 
51.
Vincent, B., LaRue, R., Sealey, V., & Engelke, N. (2015). Calculus students’ early concept images of tangent lines. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(5), 641-657.
Google Scholar
 
 
52.
Vinner, S. (1983). Concept definition, concept image and the notion of function. International Journal of Education in Science and Technology, 14, 293-305.
Google Scholar
 
 
53.
Ward Jr, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236-244.
Google Scholar
 
 
54.
Wynn, K. (1992). Children’s acquisition of the number words and the counting system. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 220-251.
Google Scholar
 
 
55.
Yesilbudak, M., Kahraman, H. T., & Karacan, H. (2011). Object oriented agglomerative hierarchical clustering model in data mining. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 26(1), 27-39.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top